Electronic cigarettes

A position statement of the Forum of International Respiratory Societies

Dean E. Schraufnagel, Francesco Blasi, M. Bradley Drummond, David C L Lam, Ehsan Latif, Mark J. Rosen, Raul Sansores, Richard Van Zyl-Smit, of International Respiratory Societies Forum of International Respiratory Societies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Awareness and usage of electronic cigarettes has exponentially increased during the last few years, especially among young people and women in some countries. The rapid acceptance of electronic cigarettes may be attributed in part to the perception created by marketing and the popular press that they are safer than combustible cigarettes. Goals: To alert and advise policy makers about electronic cigarettes and their potential hazards. Methods: Using The Union's position paper on electronic cigarettes as the starting template, the document was written using an iterative process. Portions of the manuscript have been taken directly from the position papers of participating societies. Results: Because electronic cigarettes generate less tar and carcinogens than combustible cigarettes, use of electronic cigarettes may reduce disease caused by those components. However, the health risks of electronic cigarettes have not been adequately studied. Studies looking at whether electronic cigarettes can aid smoking cessation have had inconsistent results. Moreover, the availability of electronic cigarettes may have an overall adverse health impact by increasing initiation and reducing cessation of combustible nicotine delivery products. Conclusions: The health and safety claims regarding electronic nicotine delivery devices should be subject to evidentiary review. The potential benefits of electronic cigarettes to an individual smoker should be weighed against potential harm to the population of increased social acceptability of smoking and use of nicotine, the latter of which has addictive power and untoward effects. As a precaution, electronic nicotine delivery devices should be restricted or banned until more information about their safety is available. If they are allowed, they should be closely regulated as medicines or tobacco products.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)611-618
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume190
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 2014

Fingerprint

Nicotine
Tobacco Products
Health
Electronic Cigarettes
Safety
Tars
Equipment and Supplies
Manuscripts
Smoking Cessation
Marketing
Administrative Personnel
Carcinogens
Smoking
Population

Keywords

  • Electronic cigarettes
  • Nicotine delivery devices
  • Tobacco products

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Schraufnagel, D. E., Blasi, F., Drummond, M. B., Lam, D. C. L., Latif, E., Rosen, M. J., ... Forum of International Respiratory Societies, O. I. R. S. (2014). Electronic cigarettes: A position statement of the Forum of International Respiratory Societies. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 190(6), 611-618. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201407-1198PP

Electronic cigarettes : A position statement of the Forum of International Respiratory Societies. / Schraufnagel, Dean E.; Blasi, Francesco; Drummond, M. Bradley; Lam, David C L; Latif, Ehsan; Rosen, Mark J.; Sansores, Raul; Van Zyl-Smit, Richard; Forum of International Respiratory Societies, of International Respiratory Societies.

In: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 190, No. 6, 15.09.2014, p. 611-618.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schraufnagel, DE, Blasi, F, Drummond, MB, Lam, DCL, Latif, E, Rosen, MJ, Sansores, R, Van Zyl-Smit, R & Forum of International Respiratory Societies, OIRS 2014, 'Electronic cigarettes: A position statement of the Forum of International Respiratory Societies', American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 190, no. 6, pp. 611-618. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201407-1198PP
Schraufnagel, Dean E. ; Blasi, Francesco ; Drummond, M. Bradley ; Lam, David C L ; Latif, Ehsan ; Rosen, Mark J. ; Sansores, Raul ; Van Zyl-Smit, Richard ; Forum of International Respiratory Societies, of International Respiratory Societies. / Electronic cigarettes : A position statement of the Forum of International Respiratory Societies. In: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 190, No. 6. pp. 611-618.
@article{f9419928fdd44c029b05d78d24ec99fb,
title = "Electronic cigarettes: A position statement of the Forum of International Respiratory Societies",
abstract = "Background: Awareness and usage of electronic cigarettes has exponentially increased during the last few years, especially among young people and women in some countries. The rapid acceptance of electronic cigarettes may be attributed in part to the perception created by marketing and the popular press that they are safer than combustible cigarettes. Goals: To alert and advise policy makers about electronic cigarettes and their potential hazards. Methods: Using The Union's position paper on electronic cigarettes as the starting template, the document was written using an iterative process. Portions of the manuscript have been taken directly from the position papers of participating societies. Results: Because electronic cigarettes generate less tar and carcinogens than combustible cigarettes, use of electronic cigarettes may reduce disease caused by those components. However, the health risks of electronic cigarettes have not been adequately studied. Studies looking at whether electronic cigarettes can aid smoking cessation have had inconsistent results. Moreover, the availability of electronic cigarettes may have an overall adverse health impact by increasing initiation and reducing cessation of combustible nicotine delivery products. Conclusions: The health and safety claims regarding electronic nicotine delivery devices should be subject to evidentiary review. The potential benefits of electronic cigarettes to an individual smoker should be weighed against potential harm to the population of increased social acceptability of smoking and use of nicotine, the latter of which has addictive power and untoward effects. As a precaution, electronic nicotine delivery devices should be restricted or banned until more information about their safety is available. If they are allowed, they should be closely regulated as medicines or tobacco products.",
keywords = "Electronic cigarettes, Nicotine delivery devices, Tobacco products",
author = "Schraufnagel, {Dean E.} and Francesco Blasi and Drummond, {M. Bradley} and Lam, {David C L} and Ehsan Latif and Rosen, {Mark J.} and Raul Sansores and {Van Zyl-Smit}, Richard and {Forum of International Respiratory Societies}, {of International Respiratory Societies}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1164/rccm.201407-1198PP",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "190",
pages = "611--618",
journal = "American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1073-449X",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electronic cigarettes

T2 - A position statement of the Forum of International Respiratory Societies

AU - Schraufnagel, Dean E.

AU - Blasi, Francesco

AU - Drummond, M. Bradley

AU - Lam, David C L

AU - Latif, Ehsan

AU - Rosen, Mark J.

AU - Sansores, Raul

AU - Van Zyl-Smit, Richard

AU - Forum of International Respiratory Societies, of International Respiratory Societies

PY - 2014/9/15

Y1 - 2014/9/15

N2 - Background: Awareness and usage of electronic cigarettes has exponentially increased during the last few years, especially among young people and women in some countries. The rapid acceptance of electronic cigarettes may be attributed in part to the perception created by marketing and the popular press that they are safer than combustible cigarettes. Goals: To alert and advise policy makers about electronic cigarettes and their potential hazards. Methods: Using The Union's position paper on electronic cigarettes as the starting template, the document was written using an iterative process. Portions of the manuscript have been taken directly from the position papers of participating societies. Results: Because electronic cigarettes generate less tar and carcinogens than combustible cigarettes, use of electronic cigarettes may reduce disease caused by those components. However, the health risks of electronic cigarettes have not been adequately studied. Studies looking at whether electronic cigarettes can aid smoking cessation have had inconsistent results. Moreover, the availability of electronic cigarettes may have an overall adverse health impact by increasing initiation and reducing cessation of combustible nicotine delivery products. Conclusions: The health and safety claims regarding electronic nicotine delivery devices should be subject to evidentiary review. The potential benefits of electronic cigarettes to an individual smoker should be weighed against potential harm to the population of increased social acceptability of smoking and use of nicotine, the latter of which has addictive power and untoward effects. As a precaution, electronic nicotine delivery devices should be restricted or banned until more information about their safety is available. If they are allowed, they should be closely regulated as medicines or tobacco products.

AB - Background: Awareness and usage of electronic cigarettes has exponentially increased during the last few years, especially among young people and women in some countries. The rapid acceptance of electronic cigarettes may be attributed in part to the perception created by marketing and the popular press that they are safer than combustible cigarettes. Goals: To alert and advise policy makers about electronic cigarettes and their potential hazards. Methods: Using The Union's position paper on electronic cigarettes as the starting template, the document was written using an iterative process. Portions of the manuscript have been taken directly from the position papers of participating societies. Results: Because electronic cigarettes generate less tar and carcinogens than combustible cigarettes, use of electronic cigarettes may reduce disease caused by those components. However, the health risks of electronic cigarettes have not been adequately studied. Studies looking at whether electronic cigarettes can aid smoking cessation have had inconsistent results. Moreover, the availability of electronic cigarettes may have an overall adverse health impact by increasing initiation and reducing cessation of combustible nicotine delivery products. Conclusions: The health and safety claims regarding electronic nicotine delivery devices should be subject to evidentiary review. The potential benefits of electronic cigarettes to an individual smoker should be weighed against potential harm to the population of increased social acceptability of smoking and use of nicotine, the latter of which has addictive power and untoward effects. As a precaution, electronic nicotine delivery devices should be restricted or banned until more information about their safety is available. If they are allowed, they should be closely regulated as medicines or tobacco products.

KW - Electronic cigarettes

KW - Nicotine delivery devices

KW - Tobacco products

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908105544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908105544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1164/rccm.201407-1198PP

DO - 10.1164/rccm.201407-1198PP

M3 - Article

VL - 190

SP - 611

EP - 618

JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1073-449X

IS - 6

ER -