Electrically evoked electroretinograms and pupil responses in Argus II retinal implant wearers

H. Christiaan Stronks, Michael P. Barry, Gislin Dagnelie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose We have recorded the electrically evoked electroretinogram (eERG) and flash ERG in Argus II retinal prosthesis wearers with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa to estimate response properties of the degenerated inner retina to local electrical stimulation. In addition, we have recorded pupil diameters during electrical stimulation. Methods Raw corneal eERGs were recorded at multiple stimulus levels in three subjects. eERG signals were heavily contaminated with various artifacts, including switching artifacts generated by the implant electronics, stimulus, blink, and eye-movement artifacts. Pupil responses were recorded in one subject using a pupil tracker. Results eERGs were decontaminated by a variety of techniques, including wavelet transformation and response averaging. The dominant component was a negative wave peaking at approximately 200 ms. eERG amplitudes correlated significantly with stimulus level, but peak latencies did not correlate with stimulus level. Pupil constriction correlated significantly with stimulus level and pupil responses could be accurately used to estimate subjective threshold. Conclusion eERG recordings hold the potential to be developed further for use as a diagnostic tool for retinal implants. A straightforward approach to increase eERG amplitudes would be the development of intraocular recording methods based on reverse telemetry. The robust pupil response to electrical stimulation in one subject indicates that pupillography can be exploited to assess implant functionality, but reliable pupil recordings could not be obtained in all subjects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalDocumenta Ophthalmologica
Volume132
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Pupil
Artifacts
Electric Stimulation
Visual Prosthesis
Telemetry
Retinitis Pigmentosa
Eye Movements
Constriction
Retina

Keywords

  • Argus II
  • Electrical stimulation
  • Electrophysiology
  • Electroretinogram
  • Pupil tracking
  • Pupillography
  • Retinal implant

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Electrically evoked electroretinograms and pupil responses in Argus II retinal implant wearers. / Stronks, H. Christiaan; Barry, Michael P.; Dagnelie, Gislin.

In: Documenta Ophthalmologica, Vol. 132, No. 1, 01.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9fc8d53004fc4d17bd9ddbbd31e95e29,
title = "Electrically evoked electroretinograms and pupil responses in Argus II retinal implant wearers",
abstract = "Purpose We have recorded the electrically evoked electroretinogram (eERG) and flash ERG in Argus II retinal prosthesis wearers with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa to estimate response properties of the degenerated inner retina to local electrical stimulation. In addition, we have recorded pupil diameters during electrical stimulation. Methods Raw corneal eERGs were recorded at multiple stimulus levels in three subjects. eERG signals were heavily contaminated with various artifacts, including switching artifacts generated by the implant electronics, stimulus, blink, and eye-movement artifacts. Pupil responses were recorded in one subject using a pupil tracker. Results eERGs were decontaminated by a variety of techniques, including wavelet transformation and response averaging. The dominant component was a negative wave peaking at approximately 200 ms. eERG amplitudes correlated significantly with stimulus level, but peak latencies did not correlate with stimulus level. Pupil constriction correlated significantly with stimulus level and pupil responses could be accurately used to estimate subjective threshold. Conclusion eERG recordings hold the potential to be developed further for use as a diagnostic tool for retinal implants. A straightforward approach to increase eERG amplitudes would be the development of intraocular recording methods based on reverse telemetry. The robust pupil response to electrical stimulation in one subject indicates that pupillography can be exploited to assess implant functionality, but reliable pupil recordings could not be obtained in all subjects.",
keywords = "Argus II, Electrical stimulation, Electrophysiology, Electroretinogram, Pupil tracking, Pupillography, Retinal implant",
author = "Stronks, {H. Christiaan} and Barry, {Michael P.} and Gislin Dagnelie",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10633-015-9522-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "132",
journal = "Documenta Ophthalmologica",
issn = "0012-4486",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrically evoked electroretinograms and pupil responses in Argus II retinal implant wearers

AU - Stronks, H. Christiaan

AU - Barry, Michael P.

AU - Dagnelie, Gislin

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Purpose We have recorded the electrically evoked electroretinogram (eERG) and flash ERG in Argus II retinal prosthesis wearers with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa to estimate response properties of the degenerated inner retina to local electrical stimulation. In addition, we have recorded pupil diameters during electrical stimulation. Methods Raw corneal eERGs were recorded at multiple stimulus levels in three subjects. eERG signals were heavily contaminated with various artifacts, including switching artifacts generated by the implant electronics, stimulus, blink, and eye-movement artifacts. Pupil responses were recorded in one subject using a pupil tracker. Results eERGs were decontaminated by a variety of techniques, including wavelet transformation and response averaging. The dominant component was a negative wave peaking at approximately 200 ms. eERG amplitudes correlated significantly with stimulus level, but peak latencies did not correlate with stimulus level. Pupil constriction correlated significantly with stimulus level and pupil responses could be accurately used to estimate subjective threshold. Conclusion eERG recordings hold the potential to be developed further for use as a diagnostic tool for retinal implants. A straightforward approach to increase eERG amplitudes would be the development of intraocular recording methods based on reverse telemetry. The robust pupil response to electrical stimulation in one subject indicates that pupillography can be exploited to assess implant functionality, but reliable pupil recordings could not be obtained in all subjects.

AB - Purpose We have recorded the electrically evoked electroretinogram (eERG) and flash ERG in Argus II retinal prosthesis wearers with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa to estimate response properties of the degenerated inner retina to local electrical stimulation. In addition, we have recorded pupil diameters during electrical stimulation. Methods Raw corneal eERGs were recorded at multiple stimulus levels in three subjects. eERG signals were heavily contaminated with various artifacts, including switching artifacts generated by the implant electronics, stimulus, blink, and eye-movement artifacts. Pupil responses were recorded in one subject using a pupil tracker. Results eERGs were decontaminated by a variety of techniques, including wavelet transformation and response averaging. The dominant component was a negative wave peaking at approximately 200 ms. eERG amplitudes correlated significantly with stimulus level, but peak latencies did not correlate with stimulus level. Pupil constriction correlated significantly with stimulus level and pupil responses could be accurately used to estimate subjective threshold. Conclusion eERG recordings hold the potential to be developed further for use as a diagnostic tool for retinal implants. A straightforward approach to increase eERG amplitudes would be the development of intraocular recording methods based on reverse telemetry. The robust pupil response to electrical stimulation in one subject indicates that pupillography can be exploited to assess implant functionality, but reliable pupil recordings could not be obtained in all subjects.

KW - Argus II

KW - Electrical stimulation

KW - Electrophysiology

KW - Electroretinogram

KW - Pupil tracking

KW - Pupillography

KW - Retinal implant

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007247365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007247365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10633-015-9522-x

DO - 10.1007/s10633-015-9522-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 26743880

AN - SCOPUS:84953397686

VL - 132

JO - Documenta Ophthalmologica

JF - Documenta Ophthalmologica

SN - 0012-4486

IS - 1

ER -