Electric charge requirements of pediatric cochlear implant recipients enrolled in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study

Teresa A. Zwolan; Mary Beth O'Sullivan; Nancy E. Fink; John K. Niparko; Laurie Eisenberg; William Luxford; Karen Johnson; Amy Martinez; Jean DesJardin; Leslie Visser-Dumont; Sophie Ambrose; Carren Stika; Melinda Gillinger; John Niparko; Jill Chinnici; Howard Francis; Steve Bowditch; Jennifer Yeagle; Courtney Carver; Andrea Marlowe; Andrea Gregg; Jennifer Gross; Rick Ostrander; Nancy Mellon; Jennifer Mertes; Mary O.Leary Kane; Annelle Hodges; Thomas Balkany; Alina Lopez; Leslie Goodwin; Teresa Zwolan; Anita Vereb; Caroline Arnedt; Holly F.B. Teagle; Carolyn J. Brown; Craig A. Buchman; Carlton Zdanski; Hannah Eskridge; Emily Tobey; Andrea Warner-Czyz; Deborah Rekart; Carol Cokely; Nicole Weissner; Angela Boyd; Alexandra Quittner; Ivette Cruz; David Barker; Nancy Fink; Nae Yuh Wang; Daniel Habtemariam; Thelma Vilche; Patricia Bayton

doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318161aac7

Electric charge requirements of pediatric cochlear implant recipients enrolled in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study

Teresa A. Zwolan, Mary Beth O'Sullivan, Nancy E. Fink, John K. Niparko, Laurie Eisenberg, William Luxford, Karen Johnson, Amy Martinez, Jean DesJardin, Leslie Visser-Dumont, Sophie Ambrose, Carren Stika, Melinda Gillinger, John Niparko, Jill Chinnici, Howard Francis, Steve Bowditch, Jennifer Yeagle, Courtney Carver, Andrea MarloweAndrea Gregg, Jennifer Gross, Rick Ostrander, Nancy Mellon, Jennifer Mertes, Mary O.Leary Kane, Annelle Hodges, Thomas Balkany, Alina Lopez, Leslie Goodwin, Teresa Zwolan, Anita Vereb, Caroline Arnedt, Holly F.B. Teagle, Carolyn J. Brown, Craig A. Buchman, Carlton Zdanski, Hannah Eskridge, Emily Tobey, Andrea Warner-Czyz, Deborah Rekart, Carol Cokely, Nicole Weissner, Angela Boyd, Alexandra Quittner, Ivette Cruz, David Barker, Nancy Fink, Nae Yuh Wang, Daniel Habtemariam, Thelma Vilche, Patricia Bayton

School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mapping characteristics of children with cochlear implants who are enrolled in the Childhood Development After Cochlear Implantation (CDACI) multicenter study. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal evaluation during 24 months of speech processor maps of children with cochlear implants prospectively enrolled in the study. SETTING: Six tertiary referral centers. SUBJECTS: One hundred eighty-eight children enrolled in the CDACI study who were 5 years old or younger at the time of enrollment. Of these children, 184 received unilateral implants, and 4 received simultaneous bilateral implants. INTERVENTION: Children attended regular mapping sessions at their implant clinic as part of the study protocol. Maps were examined for each subject at 4 different time intervals: at device activation and 6, 12, and 24 months postactivation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean C/M levels (in charge per phase) were compared for 4 different time intervals, for 3 different devices, for 6 different implant centers, and for children with normal and abnormal cochleae. RESULTS: All 3 types of implant devices demonstrate significant increases in C/M levels between device activation and the 24-month appointment. Significant differences in mean C/M levels were noted between devices. Children with cochlear anomalies demonstrate significantly greater C/M levels than children with normal cochleae. CONCLUSION: The CDACI study has enabled us to evaluate the mapping characteristics of pediatric patients who use 3 different devices and were implanted at a variety of implant centers. Analysis of such data enables us to better understand the mapping characteristics of children with cochlear implants.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	143-148
Number of pages	6
Journal	Otology and Neurotology
Volume	29
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318161aac7
State	Published - Feb 2008

Keywords

C level
Cochlear implant
Electric charge
Mapping
Pediatric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Otorhinolaryngology
Sensory Systems
Clinical Neurology

Access to Document

10.1097/MAO.0b013e318161aac7

Cite this

Zwolan, T. A., O'Sullivan, M. B., Fink, N. E., Niparko, J. K., Eisenberg, L., Luxford, W., Johnson, K., Martinez, A., DesJardin, J., Visser-Dumont, L., Ambrose, S., Stika, C., Gillinger, M., Niparko, J., Chinnici, J., Francis, H., Bowditch, S., Yeagle, J., Carver, C., ... Bayton, P. (2008). Electric charge requirements of pediatric cochlear implant recipients enrolled in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study. Otology and Neurotology, 29(2), 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318161aac7

Zwolan, TA, O'Sullivan, MB, Fink, NE, Niparko, JK, Eisenberg, L, Luxford, W, Johnson, K, Martinez, A, DesJardin, J, Visser-Dumont, L, Ambrose, S, Stika, C, Gillinger, M, Niparko, J, Chinnici, J, Francis, H, Bowditch, S , Yeagle, J , Carver, C, Marlowe, A, Gregg, A, Gross, J, Ostrander, R, Mellon, N, Mertes, J, Kane, MOL, Hodges, A, Balkany, T, Lopez, A, Goodwin, L, Zwolan, T, Vereb, A, Arnedt, C, Teagle, HFB, Brown, CJ, Buchman, CA, Zdanski, C, Eskridge, H, Tobey, E, Warner-Czyz, A, Rekart, D, Cokely, C, Weissner, N, Boyd, A, Quittner, A, Cruz, I, Barker, D, Fink, N, Wang, NY, Habtemariam, D, Vilche, T & Bayton, P 2008, 'Electric charge requirements of pediatric cochlear implant recipients enrolled in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study', Otology and Neurotology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318161aac7

@article{983d76900e774f688e3521cdf037625d,

title = "Electric charge requirements of pediatric cochlear implant recipients enrolled in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study",

abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mapping characteristics of children with cochlear implants who are enrolled in the Childhood Development After Cochlear Implantation (CDACI) multicenter study. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal evaluation during 24 months of speech processor maps of children with cochlear implants prospectively enrolled in the study. SETTING: Six tertiary referral centers. SUBJECTS: One hundred eighty-eight children enrolled in the CDACI study who were 5 years old or younger at the time of enrollment. Of these children, 184 received unilateral implants, and 4 received simultaneous bilateral implants. INTERVENTION: Children attended regular mapping sessions at their implant clinic as part of the study protocol. Maps were examined for each subject at 4 different time intervals: at device activation and 6, 12, and 24 months postactivation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean C/M levels (in charge per phase) were compared for 4 different time intervals, for 3 different devices, for 6 different implant centers, and for children with normal and abnormal cochleae. RESULTS: All 3 types of implant devices demonstrate significant increases in C/M levels between device activation and the 24-month appointment. Significant differences in mean C/M levels were noted between devices. Children with cochlear anomalies demonstrate significantly greater C/M levels than children with normal cochleae. CONCLUSION: The CDACI study has enabled us to evaluate the mapping characteristics of pediatric patients who use 3 different devices and were implanted at a variety of implant centers. Analysis of such data enables us to better understand the mapping characteristics of children with cochlear implants.",

keywords = "C level, Cochlear implant, Electric charge, Mapping, Pediatric",

author = "Zwolan, {Teresa A.} and O'Sullivan, {Mary Beth} and Fink, {Nancy E.} and Niparko, {John K.} and Laurie Eisenberg and William Luxford and Karen Johnson and Amy Martinez and Jean DesJardin and Leslie Visser-Dumont and Sophie Ambrose and Carren Stika and Melinda Gillinger and John Niparko and Jill Chinnici and Howard Francis and Steve Bowditch and Jennifer Yeagle and Courtney Carver and Andrea Marlowe and Andrea Gregg and Jennifer Gross and Rick Ostrander and Nancy Mellon and Jennifer Mertes and Kane, {Mary O.Leary} and Annelle Hodges and Thomas Balkany and Alina Lopez and Leslie Goodwin and Teresa Zwolan and Anita Vereb and Caroline Arnedt and Teagle, {Holly F.B.} and Brown, {Carolyn J.} and Buchman, {Craig A.} and Carlton Zdanski and Hannah Eskridge and Emily Tobey and Andrea Warner-Czyz and Deborah Rekart and Carol Cokely and Nicole Weissner and Angela Boyd and Alexandra Quittner and Ivette Cruz and David Barker and Nancy Fink and Wang, {Nae Yuh} and Daniel Habtemariam and Thelma Vilche and Patricia Bayton",

year = "2008",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1097/MAO.0b013e318161aac7",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "29",

pages = "143--148",

journal = "Otology and Neurotology",

issn = "1531-7129",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electric charge requirements of pediatric cochlear implant recipients enrolled in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study

AU - Zwolan, Teresa A.

AU - O'Sullivan, Mary Beth

AU - Fink, Nancy E.

AU - Niparko, John K.

AU - Eisenberg, Laurie

AU - Luxford, William

AU - Johnson, Karen

AU - Martinez, Amy

AU - DesJardin, Jean

AU - Visser-Dumont, Leslie

AU - Ambrose, Sophie

AU - Stika, Carren

AU - Gillinger, Melinda

AU - Niparko, John

AU - Chinnici, Jill

AU - Francis, Howard

AU - Bowditch, Steve

AU - Yeagle, Jennifer

AU - Carver, Courtney

AU - Marlowe, Andrea

AU - Gregg, Andrea

AU - Gross, Jennifer

AU - Ostrander, Rick

AU - Mellon, Nancy

AU - Mertes, Jennifer

AU - Kane, Mary O.Leary

AU - Hodges, Annelle

AU - Balkany, Thomas

AU - Lopez, Alina

AU - Goodwin, Leslie

AU - Zwolan, Teresa

AU - Vereb, Anita

AU - Arnedt, Caroline

AU - Teagle, Holly F.B.

AU - Brown, Carolyn J.

AU - Buchman, Craig A.

AU - Zdanski, Carlton

AU - Eskridge, Hannah

AU - Tobey, Emily

AU - Warner-Czyz, Andrea

AU - Rekart, Deborah

AU - Cokely, Carol

AU - Weissner, Nicole

AU - Boyd, Angela

AU - Quittner, Alexandra

AU - Cruz, Ivette

AU - Barker, David

AU - Fink, Nancy

AU - Wang, Nae Yuh

AU - Habtemariam, Daniel

AU - Vilche, Thelma

AU - Bayton, Patricia

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mapping characteristics of children with cochlear implants who are enrolled in the Childhood Development After Cochlear Implantation (CDACI) multicenter study. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal evaluation during 24 months of speech processor maps of children with cochlear implants prospectively enrolled in the study. SETTING: Six tertiary referral centers. SUBJECTS: One hundred eighty-eight children enrolled in the CDACI study who were 5 years old or younger at the time of enrollment. Of these children, 184 received unilateral implants, and 4 received simultaneous bilateral implants. INTERVENTION: Children attended regular mapping sessions at their implant clinic as part of the study protocol. Maps were examined for each subject at 4 different time intervals: at device activation and 6, 12, and 24 months postactivation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean C/M levels (in charge per phase) were compared for 4 different time intervals, for 3 different devices, for 6 different implant centers, and for children with normal and abnormal cochleae. RESULTS: All 3 types of implant devices demonstrate significant increases in C/M levels between device activation and the 24-month appointment. Significant differences in mean C/M levels were noted between devices. Children with cochlear anomalies demonstrate significantly greater C/M levels than children with normal cochleae. CONCLUSION: The CDACI study has enabled us to evaluate the mapping characteristics of pediatric patients who use 3 different devices and were implanted at a variety of implant centers. Analysis of such data enables us to better understand the mapping characteristics of children with cochlear implants.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mapping characteristics of children with cochlear implants who are enrolled in the Childhood Development After Cochlear Implantation (CDACI) multicenter study. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal evaluation during 24 months of speech processor maps of children with cochlear implants prospectively enrolled in the study. SETTING: Six tertiary referral centers. SUBJECTS: One hundred eighty-eight children enrolled in the CDACI study who were 5 years old or younger at the time of enrollment. Of these children, 184 received unilateral implants, and 4 received simultaneous bilateral implants. INTERVENTION: Children attended regular mapping sessions at their implant clinic as part of the study protocol. Maps were examined for each subject at 4 different time intervals: at device activation and 6, 12, and 24 months postactivation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean C/M levels (in charge per phase) were compared for 4 different time intervals, for 3 different devices, for 6 different implant centers, and for children with normal and abnormal cochleae. RESULTS: All 3 types of implant devices demonstrate significant increases in C/M levels between device activation and the 24-month appointment. Significant differences in mean C/M levels were noted between devices. Children with cochlear anomalies demonstrate significantly greater C/M levels than children with normal cochleae. CONCLUSION: The CDACI study has enabled us to evaluate the mapping characteristics of pediatric patients who use 3 different devices and were implanted at a variety of implant centers. Analysis of such data enables us to better understand the mapping characteristics of children with cochlear implants.

KW - C level

KW - Cochlear implant

KW - Electric charge

KW - Mapping

KW - Pediatric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38649125941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38649125941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318161aac7

DO - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318161aac7

M3 - Article

C2 - 18223443

AN - SCOPUS:38649125941

SN - 1531-7129

VL - 29

SP - 143

EP - 148

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

IS - 2

ER -

Electric charge requirements of pediatric cochlear implant recipients enrolled in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this