Efficacy of Radium-223 in Bone-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer with and Without Homologous Repair Gene Defects

Pedro Isaacsson Velho, Fahad Qazi, Sayeedul Hassan, Michael A Carducci, Samuel R Denmeade, Mark Markowski, Daniel L. Thorek, Theodore DeWeese, Danny Y Song, Phuoc T Tran, Mario Eisenberger, Emmanuel Antonarakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Pathogenic mutations in genes mediating homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair are present in 20–30% of men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Radium-223 is a bone-seeking α-emitter that induces double-strand DNA breaks, thereby killing cancer cells in the bone microenvironment. Objective: To evaluate the potential impact of germline or somatic HR-deficiency (HRD) mutations on radium-223 efficacy in mCRPC with bone metastasis. Design, setting, and participants: This is a retrospective single-institution study. Medical records of 190 mCRPC patients for whom germline and/or somatic DNA sequencing data were available were reviewed. Of these patients, 28 had received standard-of-care radium-223 at Johns Hopkins between February 2013 and February 2018. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) responses and time-to-ALP-progression were the coprimary endpoints. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses, overall survival (OS), and time to next systemic therapy were also evaluated. Results and limitations: Of the 28 patients included, 10 men (35.7%) had a germline/somatic HRD mutation (three in BRCA2, and one each in ATM, ATR, CHEK2, FANCG, FANCI, FANCL, and PALB2) and 18 (64.3%) did not. Men with HRD mutations (HRD +) had numerically lower ages (66 vs 73 yr, p = 0.25), more soft-tissue metastases (50% vs 38%, p = 0.43), and higher baseline ALP levels (130 vs 108 U/l, p = 0.84). Compared with HRD(–) men, HRD(+) patients showed greater ALP responses (80% vs 39%, p = 0.04), longer time to ALP progression (median10.4 vs 5.8 mo, hazard ratio [HR] 6.4, p = 0.005), and a trend toward longer OS (median 36.9 vs 19.0 mo, HR 3.3, p = 0.11). PSA responses (0% vs 0%, p > 0.99) and time to next systemic therapy (HR 1.5, p = 0.39) were similar between the two groups. Results are limited by the retrospective nature of the analysis and the small sample size. Conclusions: In this exploratory study, bone-metastatic CRPC patients with inactivating HRD mutations demonstrated significantly improved ALP responses and time to ALP progression. These results should motivate prospective validation of the “synthetic lethality” hypothesis between HRD mutations and radium-223 activity. Patient summary: In this report, we retrospectively examined outcomes to metastatic prostate cancer in patients with and without DNA repair mutations who received radium-223, a therapy that kills cancer cells by causing direct DNA damage. Our study suggested that patients who have inherited or acquired DNA repair gene mutations derived greater benefit from radium-223 when compared with patients without these mutations. We concluded that radium-223 might have an important role in this setting; however, prospective studies are needed to confirm whether DNA repair mutations truly make radium-223 work better or not. Our study showed that metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis and inactivating homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) mutations have a significantly improved alkaline phosphatase (ALP) response and time to ALP progression. These results should motivate prospective validation of the “synthetic lethality” hypothesis between HRD mutations and greater radium-223 activity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEuropean Urology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • DNA repair
  • Germline
  • Mutations
  • Prostate cancer
  • Radium-223
  • Somatic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of Radium-223 in Bone-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer with and Without Homologous Repair Gene Defects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this