Effects of varying irrelevant information on adult age differences in problem solving

W. J. Hoyer, George Rebok, S. Marx Sved

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Sixty young (M=20.6), middle-aged (M=52.4), and elderly (M=72.6) men and women solved problems which required them to match one of two stimulus arrays to a standard. On each problem one dimension (color, form, number, or position) was relevant to correct matching, and three dimensions, which were either variable or constant, were irrelevant to solution. Age and the number of variable irrelevant dimensions were the best predictors of reaction time and error scores. Young were significantly faster than middle-aged and the middle-aged were faster than the elderly. The elderly made most errors, but the young and middle-aged were not significantly different from each other. Reaction times and errors increased as the number of variable irrelevant dimensions increased. For the elderly there was a disproportionate increase in both reaction times and errors as levels of irrelevancy increased. No reliable differences were found with regard to gender. The results were discussed in terms of an age-related decline in the ability to ignore irrelevant information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)553-560
Number of pages8
JournalJournals of Gerontology
Volume34
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1979
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reaction Time
Aptitude
Color

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging

Cite this

Effects of varying irrelevant information on adult age differences in problem solving. / Hoyer, W. J.; Rebok, George; Marx Sved, S.

In: Journals of Gerontology, Vol. 34, No. 4, 1979, p. 553-560.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4a8493f1eb3645ab931ed17ecb35c561,
title = "Effects of varying irrelevant information on adult age differences in problem solving",
abstract = "Sixty young (M=20.6), middle-aged (M=52.4), and elderly (M=72.6) men and women solved problems which required them to match one of two stimulus arrays to a standard. On each problem one dimension (color, form, number, or position) was relevant to correct matching, and three dimensions, which were either variable or constant, were irrelevant to solution. Age and the number of variable irrelevant dimensions were the best predictors of reaction time and error scores. Young were significantly faster than middle-aged and the middle-aged were faster than the elderly. The elderly made most errors, but the young and middle-aged were not significantly different from each other. Reaction times and errors increased as the number of variable irrelevant dimensions increased. For the elderly there was a disproportionate increase in both reaction times and errors as levels of irrelevancy increased. No reliable differences were found with regard to gender. The results were discussed in terms of an age-related decline in the ability to ignore irrelevant information.",
author = "Hoyer, {W. J.} and George Rebok and {Marx Sved}, S.",
year = "1979",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "553--560",
journal = "Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences",
issn = "0022-1422",
publisher = "Gerontological Society of America",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of varying irrelevant information on adult age differences in problem solving

AU - Hoyer, W. J.

AU - Rebok, George

AU - Marx Sved, S.

PY - 1979

Y1 - 1979

N2 - Sixty young (M=20.6), middle-aged (M=52.4), and elderly (M=72.6) men and women solved problems which required them to match one of two stimulus arrays to a standard. On each problem one dimension (color, form, number, or position) was relevant to correct matching, and three dimensions, which were either variable or constant, were irrelevant to solution. Age and the number of variable irrelevant dimensions were the best predictors of reaction time and error scores. Young were significantly faster than middle-aged and the middle-aged were faster than the elderly. The elderly made most errors, but the young and middle-aged were not significantly different from each other. Reaction times and errors increased as the number of variable irrelevant dimensions increased. For the elderly there was a disproportionate increase in both reaction times and errors as levels of irrelevancy increased. No reliable differences were found with regard to gender. The results were discussed in terms of an age-related decline in the ability to ignore irrelevant information.

AB - Sixty young (M=20.6), middle-aged (M=52.4), and elderly (M=72.6) men and women solved problems which required them to match one of two stimulus arrays to a standard. On each problem one dimension (color, form, number, or position) was relevant to correct matching, and three dimensions, which were either variable or constant, were irrelevant to solution. Age and the number of variable irrelevant dimensions were the best predictors of reaction time and error scores. Young were significantly faster than middle-aged and the middle-aged were faster than the elderly. The elderly made most errors, but the young and middle-aged were not significantly different from each other. Reaction times and errors increased as the number of variable irrelevant dimensions increased. For the elderly there was a disproportionate increase in both reaction times and errors as levels of irrelevancy increased. No reliable differences were found with regard to gender. The results were discussed in terms of an age-related decline in the ability to ignore irrelevant information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018759221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018759221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 448047

AN - SCOPUS:0018759221

VL - 34

SP - 553

EP - 560

JO - Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences

JF - Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences

SN - 0022-1422

IS - 4

ER -