Effects of the physical work environment on physiological measures of stress

Julian F. Thayer, Bart Verkuil, Jos F. Brosschotj, Kampschroer Kevin, Anthony West, Carolyn Sterling, Israel C. Christie, Darrell R. Abernethy, John J. Sollers, Giovanni Cizza, Andrea H. Marques, Esther M. Sternberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims In this study we investigated the effects of the physical work environment on two physiological measures of the stress response. Methods and results Circadian variations in vagally mediated heart rate variability (HRV) and the morning rise in cortisol were evaluated in 60 participants working in a government building either in a traditional (individual offices and old cubicles; n= 40) or a modern workspace (individualized cubicles with improved views and lighting; n= 20). Results revealed significant linear (B = 1.03; confidence interval: 1.05 to 1.01, P [ 0.05) and quadratic (B = 1.001; confidence interval: 1.00041.002, P [ 0.05) trends by office type interactions for indices of vagally mediated HRV. Individuals in the old office space had flatter slopes and thus less circadian variation including less HRV at night, and a larger rise in cortisol upon awakening compared with those in the new office space. Conclusion These results indicate that physical features of the work environment may affect two aspects of the physiological stress response: circadian variations in HRV and the morning rise in cortisol. These findings have important social, economic, and public health implications for work environment risk factors on health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)431-439
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2010

Keywords

  • cortisol
  • heart rate variability
  • work stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of the physical work environment on physiological measures of stress'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this