Effects of a Comprehensive Performance Improvement Strategy on Postoperative Adverse Events in Head and Neck Surgery

Bharat Panuganti, Yuqi Qiu, Barbara Messing, Gregory Lee, Carole Fakhry, Ray Gervacio F. Blanco, Patrick Ha, Karen Messer, Joseph A. Califano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of a multifaceted performance improvement regimen to reduce the incidence of adverse events following a spectrum of head and neck surgical procedures. Methods: We conducted a chart review of patients who underwent a head and neck procedure between January 1, 2013, and October 30, 2015, at our institution, including 392 patients (450 procedures) before the quality improvement regimen was implemented (October 1, 2013) and 942 patients (1136 procedures) after implementation. Multivariate statistical models were used to investigate the association of clinical parameters and the intervention with postoperative adverse event rate. Results: The incidence of adverse events decreased from 12.9% to 7.2% (95% CI, 2.46%-9.38%) after the intervention. Male sex (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.06-2.31) and the intervention (ORadj = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.74) were predictive of overall adverse event incidence by univariate and multivariate analyses. Although patient comorbid status, quantified with the Charlson Comorbidity Index, was not found to affect overall adverse event risk, each 1-point increase in index score was associated with a 17% relative increase (ORadj = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.33) in the odds of a high-grade adverse event. Discussion: Comprehensive performance improvement programs can improve perioperative adverse event risk in head and neck surgery. Patient comorbid status and sex are considerations during assessment of the likelihood of high-grade and overall adverse event risk, respectively. Implications for Practice: Given the cost of surgical complications, a comprehensive approach to perioperative risk mitigation is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Neck
Head
Incidence
Statistical Models
Quality Improvement
Comorbidity
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • patient safety/quality improvement
  • postoperative adverse events
  • surgical complications

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Effects of a Comprehensive Performance Improvement Strategy on Postoperative Adverse Events in Head and Neck Surgery. / Panuganti, Bharat; Qiu, Yuqi; Messing, Barbara; Lee, Gregory; Fakhry, Carole; Blanco, Ray Gervacio F.; Ha, Patrick; Messer, Karen; Califano, Joseph A.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Panuganti, Bharat ; Qiu, Yuqi ; Messing, Barbara ; Lee, Gregory ; Fakhry, Carole ; Blanco, Ray Gervacio F. ; Ha, Patrick ; Messer, Karen ; Califano, Joseph A. / Effects of a Comprehensive Performance Improvement Strategy on Postoperative Adverse Events in Head and Neck Surgery. In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States). 2018.
@article{4144d9c0b3a4421cbc2fa5e595b5e0b3,
title = "Effects of a Comprehensive Performance Improvement Strategy on Postoperative Adverse Events in Head and Neck Surgery",
abstract = "Objectives: We aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of a multifaceted performance improvement regimen to reduce the incidence of adverse events following a spectrum of head and neck surgical procedures. Methods: We conducted a chart review of patients who underwent a head and neck procedure between January 1, 2013, and October 30, 2015, at our institution, including 392 patients (450 procedures) before the quality improvement regimen was implemented (October 1, 2013) and 942 patients (1136 procedures) after implementation. Multivariate statistical models were used to investigate the association of clinical parameters and the intervention with postoperative adverse event rate. Results: The incidence of adverse events decreased from 12.9{\%} to 7.2{\%} (95{\%} CI, 2.46{\%}-9.38{\%}) after the intervention. Male sex (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 1.57; 95{\%} CI, 1.06-2.31) and the intervention (ORadj = 0.51; 95{\%} CI, 0.35-0.74) were predictive of overall adverse event incidence by univariate and multivariate analyses. Although patient comorbid status, quantified with the Charlson Comorbidity Index, was not found to affect overall adverse event risk, each 1-point increase in index score was associated with a 17{\%} relative increase (ORadj = 1.17; 95{\%} CI, 1.03-1.33) in the odds of a high-grade adverse event. Discussion: Comprehensive performance improvement programs can improve perioperative adverse event risk in head and neck surgery. Patient comorbid status and sex are considerations during assessment of the likelihood of high-grade and overall adverse event risk, respectively. Implications for Practice: Given the cost of surgical complications, a comprehensive approach to perioperative risk mitigation is warranted.",
keywords = "patient safety/quality improvement, postoperative adverse events, surgical complications",
author = "Bharat Panuganti and Yuqi Qiu and Barbara Messing and Gregory Lee and Carole Fakhry and Blanco, {Ray Gervacio F.} and Patrick Ha and Karen Messer and Califano, {Joseph A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0194599818793887",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of a Comprehensive Performance Improvement Strategy on Postoperative Adverse Events in Head and Neck Surgery

AU - Panuganti, Bharat

AU - Qiu, Yuqi

AU - Messing, Barbara

AU - Lee, Gregory

AU - Fakhry, Carole

AU - Blanco, Ray Gervacio F.

AU - Ha, Patrick

AU - Messer, Karen

AU - Califano, Joseph A.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objectives: We aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of a multifaceted performance improvement regimen to reduce the incidence of adverse events following a spectrum of head and neck surgical procedures. Methods: We conducted a chart review of patients who underwent a head and neck procedure between January 1, 2013, and October 30, 2015, at our institution, including 392 patients (450 procedures) before the quality improvement regimen was implemented (October 1, 2013) and 942 patients (1136 procedures) after implementation. Multivariate statistical models were used to investigate the association of clinical parameters and the intervention with postoperative adverse event rate. Results: The incidence of adverse events decreased from 12.9% to 7.2% (95% CI, 2.46%-9.38%) after the intervention. Male sex (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.06-2.31) and the intervention (ORadj = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.74) were predictive of overall adverse event incidence by univariate and multivariate analyses. Although patient comorbid status, quantified with the Charlson Comorbidity Index, was not found to affect overall adverse event risk, each 1-point increase in index score was associated with a 17% relative increase (ORadj = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.33) in the odds of a high-grade adverse event. Discussion: Comprehensive performance improvement programs can improve perioperative adverse event risk in head and neck surgery. Patient comorbid status and sex are considerations during assessment of the likelihood of high-grade and overall adverse event risk, respectively. Implications for Practice: Given the cost of surgical complications, a comprehensive approach to perioperative risk mitigation is warranted.

AB - Objectives: We aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of a multifaceted performance improvement regimen to reduce the incidence of adverse events following a spectrum of head and neck surgical procedures. Methods: We conducted a chart review of patients who underwent a head and neck procedure between January 1, 2013, and October 30, 2015, at our institution, including 392 patients (450 procedures) before the quality improvement regimen was implemented (October 1, 2013) and 942 patients (1136 procedures) after implementation. Multivariate statistical models were used to investigate the association of clinical parameters and the intervention with postoperative adverse event rate. Results: The incidence of adverse events decreased from 12.9% to 7.2% (95% CI, 2.46%-9.38%) after the intervention. Male sex (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.06-2.31) and the intervention (ORadj = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.74) were predictive of overall adverse event incidence by univariate and multivariate analyses. Although patient comorbid status, quantified with the Charlson Comorbidity Index, was not found to affect overall adverse event risk, each 1-point increase in index score was associated with a 17% relative increase (ORadj = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.33) in the odds of a high-grade adverse event. Discussion: Comprehensive performance improvement programs can improve perioperative adverse event risk in head and neck surgery. Patient comorbid status and sex are considerations during assessment of the likelihood of high-grade and overall adverse event risk, respectively. Implications for Practice: Given the cost of surgical complications, a comprehensive approach to perioperative risk mitigation is warranted.

KW - patient safety/quality improvement

KW - postoperative adverse events

KW - surgical complications

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053388840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053388840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0194599818793887

DO - 10.1177/0194599818793887

M3 - Article

C2 - 30149772

AN - SCOPUS:85053388840

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 0194-5998

ER -