Effects and mechanisms of gastrointestinal electrical stimulation on slow waves: A systematic canine study

Yan Sun, Geng Qing Song, Jieyun Yin, Yong Lei, Jiande D.Z. Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The aims of this study were to determine optimal pacing parameters of electrical stimulation on different gut segments and to investigate effects and possible mechanisms of gastrointestinal electrical stimulation on gut slow waves. Twelve female hound-mix dogs were used in this study. A total of six pairs of electrodes were implanted on the stomach, duodenum, and ascending colon. Bilateral truncal vagotomy was performed in six of the dogs. One experiment was designed to study the effects of the pacing frequency on the entrainment of gut slow waves. Another experiment was designed to study the modulatory effects of the vagal and sympathetic pathways on gastrointestinal pacing. The frequency of slow waves was 4.88 ± 0.23 cpm (range, 4-6 cpm) in the stomach and 19.68 ± 0.31 cpm (range, 18-22 cpm) in the duodenum. There were no consistent or dominant frequencies of the slow waves in the colon. The optimal parameters to entrain slow waves were: frequency of 1.1 intrinsic frequency (IF; 10% higher than IF) and pulse width of 150-450 ms (mean, 320.0 ± 85.4 ms) for the stomach, and 1.1 IF and 10-20 ms for the small intestine. Electrical stimulation was not able to alter colon slow waves. The maximum entrainable frequency was 1.27 IF in the stomach and 1.21 IF in the duodenum. Gastrointestinal pacing was not blocked by vagotomy nor the application of an α- or β-adrenergic receptor antagonist; whereas the induction of gastric dysrhythmia with electrical stimulation was completely blocked by the application of the α- or β-adrenergic receptor antagonist. Gastrointestinal pacing is achievable in the stomach and small intestine but not the colon, and the maximal entrainable frequency of the gastric and small intestinal slow waves is about 20% higher than the IF. The entrainment of slow waves with gastrointestinal pacing is not modulated by the vagal or sympathetic pathways, suggesting a purely peripheral or muscle effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)R1392-R1399
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Volume297
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Gastrointestinal motility
  • Slow wave dysrhythmia
  • Sympathetic modulation
  • Vagal nerve modulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this