Effectiveness of restricting access to a suicide jump site: a test of the method substitution hypothesis

Alan Lee Berman, Alisonj Athey, Paul Nestadt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Reducing access to lethal means can prevent suicides. However, substitution of a suicide method remains a concern. Until 1986, the Ellington Bridge was the site of one-half of all Washington, DC bridge suicides. An antisuicide fence was installed in 1986, creating a naturalistic case–control design for testing the substitution hypothesis with the adjacent and equally as lethal jump site, the Taft Bridge. We found that suicide deaths from the Ellington Bridge were reduced by 90% (p=0.001) following barrier construction, without changes in rates of jumps from either the Taft Bridge or any other bridge in the city. Suicides by all methods decreased significantly across the study period. While the decline in suicides from the Ellington Bridge may reflect a broader decline in suicide, the decline in bridge suicide without persistent shifts in deaths to other bridges provides evidence that restricting access to one highly lethal method is effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)90-92
Number of pages3
JournalInjury Prevention
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of restricting access to a suicide jump site: a test of the method substitution hypothesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this