Effectiveness of lumbar facet joint blocks and predictive value before radiofrequency denervation the Facet Treatment Study (FACTS), a randomized, controlled clinical trial

Steven P. Cohen, Tina L. Doshi, Octav C. Constantinescu, Zirong Zhao, Connie Kurihara, Thomas M. Larkin, Scott R. Griffith, Michael B. Jacobs, William J. Kroski, Timothy C. Dawson, Ian M. Fowler, Ronald L. White, Aubrey J. Verdun, David E. Jamison, Mirinda Anderson-White, Stephanie E. Shank, Paul F. Pasquina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: With facet interventions under scrutiny, the authors' objectives were to determine the effectiveness of different lumbar facet blocks and their ability to predict radiofrequency ablation outcomes. Methods: A total of 229 participants were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to receive intraarticular facet injections with bupivacaine and steroid, medial branch blocks, or saline. Those with a positive 1-month outcome (a 2-point or more reduction in average pain score) and score higher than 3 (positive satisfaction) on a 5-point satisfaction scale were followed up to 6 months. Participants in the intraarticular and medial branch block groups with a positive diagnostic block (50% or more relief ) who experienced a negative outcome proceeded to the second phase and underwent radiofrequency ablation, while all saline group individuals underwent ablation. Coprimary outcome measures were average reduction in numerical rating scale pain score 1 month after the facet or saline blocks, and average numerical rating scale pain score 3 months after ablation. Results: Mean reduction in average numerical rating scale pain score at 1 month was 0.7 ± 1.6 in the intraarticular group, 0.7 ± 1.8 in the medial branch block group, and 0.7 ± 1.5 in the placebo group; P = 0.993. The proportions of positive blocks were higher in the intraarticular (54%) and medial branch (55%) groups than in the placebo group (30%; P = 0.01). Radiofrequency ablation was performed on 135 patients (45, 48, and 42 patients from the intraarticular, medial branch, and saline groups, respectively). The average numerical rating scale pain score at 3 months was 3.0 ± 2.0 in the intraarticular, 3.2 ± 2.5 in the medial branch, and 3.5 ± 1.9 in the control group (P = 0.493). At 3 months, the proportions of positive responders in the intraarticular, medial branch block, and placebo groups were 51%, 56%, and 24% for the intraarticular, medial branch, and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.005). Conclusions: This study establishes that facet blocks are not therapeutic. The higher responder rates in the treatment groups suggest a hypothesis that facet blocks might provide prognostic value before radiofrequency ablation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)517-535
Number of pages19
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume129
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of lumbar facet joint blocks and predictive value before radiofrequency denervation the Facet Treatment Study (FACTS), a randomized, controlled clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this