Effectiveness of a protocol-based team approach to gastrointestinal hemorrhage

P. D. Stevens, J. Finegold, R. J. Garcia-Carrasquillo, P. H R Green, Frances Meyer, R. Rosenberg, S. K. Lewis, M. Rubin, L. Schneider, J. Poneros, B. Diamond, C. J. Lightdale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate a multidisciplinary gastrointestinal rapid response team (GIRRT) for the management of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). Methods: GIRRT patients: Consecutive patients evaluated by the GI service were managed by the GIRRT. Endoscopy (EGD) was performed within 12 hours of presentation. Ulcers were treated if active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel was found. Active bleeding was treated with injection of 1:10,000 epinephrine followed by therapy with a 10 Fr heater probe or 10 Fr bipolar probe until bleeding stopped and the vessel was flattened. Adherent clots were not treated. Comparison patients: The comparison group (CG) was comprised of patients treated during the same time period for PUB by gastroenterologists not associated with the GIRRT. Treatment was by choice of the attending in the CG group. GIRRT and CG cases were matched for age, sex, lesion site, and stigmata. The outcome measures compared were: initial hemostasis rate, rebleeding rate (%RB), surgery rate (%SURG), transfusion requirement (#PC), mean length of stay (LOS) and mean total hospital charges (HC). Results: From July 1995 to November 1996, 307 patients were evaluated by the GIRRT for acute UGIB and 148 peptic ulcers (48%.) were diagnosed. Forty-five GIRRT and 45 CG ulcers were matched. The Charlson comorbidity index and the Baylor bleeding score were not significantly different between groups. Ulcer stigmata for the matched cohorts were: clean base (64%), visible vessel (17.7%), active bleeding (8.8%), clot (6.6%), and flat spot (2.2%). Initial hemostasis was 100% in both groups. GIRRT and CG patients are compared below. %RB #PC %SURG LOS HC GIRRT 15.5 3.37 4.4 9.37 $29819 CG 31.1 5.62 20.0 16.15 $76935 P value

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume45
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
Hemorrhage
Peptic Ulcer
Ulcer
Hospital Charges
Christianity
Hemostasis
Length of Stay
Epinephrine
Endoscopy
Comorbidity
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Injections
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Stevens, P. D., Finegold, J., Garcia-Carrasquillo, R. J., Green, P. H. R., Meyer, F., Rosenberg, R., ... Lightdale, C. J. (1997). Effectiveness of a protocol-based team approach to gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 45(4).

Effectiveness of a protocol-based team approach to gastrointestinal hemorrhage. / Stevens, P. D.; Finegold, J.; Garcia-Carrasquillo, R. J.; Green, P. H R; Meyer, Frances; Rosenberg, R.; Lewis, S. K.; Rubin, M.; Schneider, L.; Poneros, J.; Diamond, B.; Lightdale, C. J.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 45, No. 4, 1997.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stevens, PD, Finegold, J, Garcia-Carrasquillo, RJ, Green, PHR, Meyer, F, Rosenberg, R, Lewis, SK, Rubin, M, Schneider, L, Poneros, J, Diamond, B & Lightdale, CJ 1997, 'Effectiveness of a protocol-based team approach to gastrointestinal hemorrhage', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 45, no. 4.
Stevens PD, Finegold J, Garcia-Carrasquillo RJ, Green PHR, Meyer F, Rosenberg R et al. Effectiveness of a protocol-based team approach to gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1997;45(4).
Stevens, P. D. ; Finegold, J. ; Garcia-Carrasquillo, R. J. ; Green, P. H R ; Meyer, Frances ; Rosenberg, R. ; Lewis, S. K. ; Rubin, M. ; Schneider, L. ; Poneros, J. ; Diamond, B. ; Lightdale, C. J. / Effectiveness of a protocol-based team approach to gastrointestinal hemorrhage. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1997 ; Vol. 45, No. 4.
@article{34becb096fd34f269b5039c001b2afcb,
title = "Effectiveness of a protocol-based team approach to gastrointestinal hemorrhage",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate a multidisciplinary gastrointestinal rapid response team (GIRRT) for the management of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). Methods: GIRRT patients: Consecutive patients evaluated by the GI service were managed by the GIRRT. Endoscopy (EGD) was performed within 12 hours of presentation. Ulcers were treated if active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel was found. Active bleeding was treated with injection of 1:10,000 epinephrine followed by therapy with a 10 Fr heater probe or 10 Fr bipolar probe until bleeding stopped and the vessel was flattened. Adherent clots were not treated. Comparison patients: The comparison group (CG) was comprised of patients treated during the same time period for PUB by gastroenterologists not associated with the GIRRT. Treatment was by choice of the attending in the CG group. GIRRT and CG cases were matched for age, sex, lesion site, and stigmata. The outcome measures compared were: initial hemostasis rate, rebleeding rate ({\%}RB), surgery rate ({\%}SURG), transfusion requirement (#PC), mean length of stay (LOS) and mean total hospital charges (HC). Results: From July 1995 to November 1996, 307 patients were evaluated by the GIRRT for acute UGIB and 148 peptic ulcers (48{\%}.) were diagnosed. Forty-five GIRRT and 45 CG ulcers were matched. The Charlson comorbidity index and the Baylor bleeding score were not significantly different between groups. Ulcer stigmata for the matched cohorts were: clean base (64{\%}), visible vessel (17.7{\%}), active bleeding (8.8{\%}), clot (6.6{\%}), and flat spot (2.2{\%}). Initial hemostasis was 100{\%} in both groups. GIRRT and CG patients are compared below. {\%}RB #PC {\%}SURG LOS HC GIRRT 15.5 3.37 4.4 9.37 $29819 CG 31.1 5.62 20.0 16.15 $76935 P value",
author = "Stevens, {P. D.} and J. Finegold and Garcia-Carrasquillo, {R. J.} and Green, {P. H R} and Frances Meyer and R. Rosenberg and Lewis, {S. K.} and M. Rubin and L. Schneider and J. Poneros and B. Diamond and Lightdale, {C. J.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of a protocol-based team approach to gastrointestinal hemorrhage

AU - Stevens, P. D.

AU - Finegold, J.

AU - Garcia-Carrasquillo, R. J.

AU - Green, P. H R

AU - Meyer, Frances

AU - Rosenberg, R.

AU - Lewis, S. K.

AU - Rubin, M.

AU - Schneider, L.

AU - Poneros, J.

AU - Diamond, B.

AU - Lightdale, C. J.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate a multidisciplinary gastrointestinal rapid response team (GIRRT) for the management of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). Methods: GIRRT patients: Consecutive patients evaluated by the GI service were managed by the GIRRT. Endoscopy (EGD) was performed within 12 hours of presentation. Ulcers were treated if active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel was found. Active bleeding was treated with injection of 1:10,000 epinephrine followed by therapy with a 10 Fr heater probe or 10 Fr bipolar probe until bleeding stopped and the vessel was flattened. Adherent clots were not treated. Comparison patients: The comparison group (CG) was comprised of patients treated during the same time period for PUB by gastroenterologists not associated with the GIRRT. Treatment was by choice of the attending in the CG group. GIRRT and CG cases were matched for age, sex, lesion site, and stigmata. The outcome measures compared were: initial hemostasis rate, rebleeding rate (%RB), surgery rate (%SURG), transfusion requirement (#PC), mean length of stay (LOS) and mean total hospital charges (HC). Results: From July 1995 to November 1996, 307 patients were evaluated by the GIRRT for acute UGIB and 148 peptic ulcers (48%.) were diagnosed. Forty-five GIRRT and 45 CG ulcers were matched. The Charlson comorbidity index and the Baylor bleeding score were not significantly different between groups. Ulcer stigmata for the matched cohorts were: clean base (64%), visible vessel (17.7%), active bleeding (8.8%), clot (6.6%), and flat spot (2.2%). Initial hemostasis was 100% in both groups. GIRRT and CG patients are compared below. %RB #PC %SURG LOS HC GIRRT 15.5 3.37 4.4 9.37 $29819 CG 31.1 5.62 20.0 16.15 $76935 P value

AB - Purpose: To evaluate a multidisciplinary gastrointestinal rapid response team (GIRRT) for the management of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). Methods: GIRRT patients: Consecutive patients evaluated by the GI service were managed by the GIRRT. Endoscopy (EGD) was performed within 12 hours of presentation. Ulcers were treated if active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel was found. Active bleeding was treated with injection of 1:10,000 epinephrine followed by therapy with a 10 Fr heater probe or 10 Fr bipolar probe until bleeding stopped and the vessel was flattened. Adherent clots were not treated. Comparison patients: The comparison group (CG) was comprised of patients treated during the same time period for PUB by gastroenterologists not associated with the GIRRT. Treatment was by choice of the attending in the CG group. GIRRT and CG cases were matched for age, sex, lesion site, and stigmata. The outcome measures compared were: initial hemostasis rate, rebleeding rate (%RB), surgery rate (%SURG), transfusion requirement (#PC), mean length of stay (LOS) and mean total hospital charges (HC). Results: From July 1995 to November 1996, 307 patients were evaluated by the GIRRT for acute UGIB and 148 peptic ulcers (48%.) were diagnosed. Forty-five GIRRT and 45 CG ulcers were matched. The Charlson comorbidity index and the Baylor bleeding score were not significantly different between groups. Ulcer stigmata for the matched cohorts were: clean base (64%), visible vessel (17.7%), active bleeding (8.8%), clot (6.6%), and flat spot (2.2%). Initial hemostasis was 100% in both groups. GIRRT and CG patients are compared below. %RB #PC %SURG LOS HC GIRRT 15.5 3.37 4.4 9.37 $29819 CG 31.1 5.62 20.0 16.15 $76935 P value

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4243609676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4243609676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:4243609676

VL - 45

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 4

ER -