Effectiveness of 80% vs 30–35% fraction of inspired oxygen in patients undergoing surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Stijn de Jonge, Matthias Egger, Asad Latif, Yoon Kong Loke, Sean Berenholtz, Marja Boermeester, Benedetta Allegranzi, Joseph Solomkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: In 2016, the WHO strongly recommended the use of a high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) in adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Since then, further trials have been published, trials included previously have come under scrutiny, and one article was retracted. We updated the systematic review on which the recommendation was based. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search from January 1990 to April 2018 for RCTs comparing the effect of high (80%) vs standard (30–35%) FiO2 on the incidence of SSI. Studies retracted or under investigation were excluded. A random effects model was used for meta-analyses; the sources of heterogeneity were explored using meta-regression. Results: Of 21 RCTs included, six were newly identified since the publication of the WHO guideline review; 17 could be included in the final analyses. Overall, no evidence for a reduction of SSI after the use of high FiO2 was found [relative risk (RR): 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73–1.07]. There was evidence that high FiO2 was beneficial in intubated patients [RR: 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64–0.99)], but not in non-intubated patients [RR: 1.20 (95% CI: 0.91–1.58); test of interaction; P=0.048]. Conclusions: The WHO updated analyses did not show definite beneficial effect of the use of high perioperative FiO2, overall, but there was evidence of effect of reducing the SSI risk in surgical patients under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. However, the evidence for this beneficial effect has become weaker and the strength of the recommendation needs to be reconsidered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Surgical Wound Infection
Meta-Analysis
Oxygen
Confidence Intervals
General Anesthesia
Intubation
Publications
Guidelines
Incidence

Keywords

  • general anaesthesia
  • hyperoxia
  • postoperative outcome
  • surgical site infection
  • surgical wound infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Effectiveness of 80% vs 30–35% fraction of inspired oxygen in patients undergoing surgery : an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. / de Jonge, Stijn; Egger, Matthias; Latif, Asad; Loke, Yoon Kong; Berenholtz, Sean; Boermeester, Marja; Allegranzi, Benedetta; Solomkin, Joseph.

In: British Journal of Anaesthesia, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{05d81d51b09342d5a442abed8cef415b,
title = "Effectiveness of 80{\%} vs 30–35{\%} fraction of inspired oxygen in patients undergoing surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background: In 2016, the WHO strongly recommended the use of a high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) in adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Since then, further trials have been published, trials included previously have come under scrutiny, and one article was retracted. We updated the systematic review on which the recommendation was based. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search from January 1990 to April 2018 for RCTs comparing the effect of high (80{\%}) vs standard (30–35{\%}) FiO2 on the incidence of SSI. Studies retracted or under investigation were excluded. A random effects model was used for meta-analyses; the sources of heterogeneity were explored using meta-regression. Results: Of 21 RCTs included, six were newly identified since the publication of the WHO guideline review; 17 could be included in the final analyses. Overall, no evidence for a reduction of SSI after the use of high FiO2 was found [relative risk (RR): 0.89; 95{\%} confidence interval (CI): 0.73–1.07]. There was evidence that high FiO2 was beneficial in intubated patients [RR: 0.80 (95{\%} CI: 0.64–0.99)], but not in non-intubated patients [RR: 1.20 (95{\%} CI: 0.91–1.58); test of interaction; P=0.048]. Conclusions: The WHO updated analyses did not show definite beneficial effect of the use of high perioperative FiO2, overall, but there was evidence of effect of reducing the SSI risk in surgical patients under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. However, the evidence for this beneficial effect has become weaker and the strength of the recommendation needs to be reconsidered.",
keywords = "general anaesthesia, hyperoxia, postoperative outcome, surgical site infection, surgical wound infection",
author = "{de Jonge}, Stijn and Matthias Egger and Asad Latif and Loke, {Yoon Kong} and Sean Berenholtz and Marja Boermeester and Benedetta Allegranzi and Joseph Solomkin",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.024",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "British Journal of Anaesthesia",
issn = "0007-0912",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of 80% vs 30–35% fraction of inspired oxygen in patients undergoing surgery

T2 - an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - de Jonge, Stijn

AU - Egger, Matthias

AU - Latif, Asad

AU - Loke, Yoon Kong

AU - Berenholtz, Sean

AU - Boermeester, Marja

AU - Allegranzi, Benedetta

AU - Solomkin, Joseph

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: In 2016, the WHO strongly recommended the use of a high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) in adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Since then, further trials have been published, trials included previously have come under scrutiny, and one article was retracted. We updated the systematic review on which the recommendation was based. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search from January 1990 to April 2018 for RCTs comparing the effect of high (80%) vs standard (30–35%) FiO2 on the incidence of SSI. Studies retracted or under investigation were excluded. A random effects model was used for meta-analyses; the sources of heterogeneity were explored using meta-regression. Results: Of 21 RCTs included, six were newly identified since the publication of the WHO guideline review; 17 could be included in the final analyses. Overall, no evidence for a reduction of SSI after the use of high FiO2 was found [relative risk (RR): 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73–1.07]. There was evidence that high FiO2 was beneficial in intubated patients [RR: 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64–0.99)], but not in non-intubated patients [RR: 1.20 (95% CI: 0.91–1.58); test of interaction; P=0.048]. Conclusions: The WHO updated analyses did not show definite beneficial effect of the use of high perioperative FiO2, overall, but there was evidence of effect of reducing the SSI risk in surgical patients under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. However, the evidence for this beneficial effect has become weaker and the strength of the recommendation needs to be reconsidered.

AB - Background: In 2016, the WHO strongly recommended the use of a high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) in adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Since then, further trials have been published, trials included previously have come under scrutiny, and one article was retracted. We updated the systematic review on which the recommendation was based. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search from January 1990 to April 2018 for RCTs comparing the effect of high (80%) vs standard (30–35%) FiO2 on the incidence of SSI. Studies retracted or under investigation were excluded. A random effects model was used for meta-analyses; the sources of heterogeneity were explored using meta-regression. Results: Of 21 RCTs included, six were newly identified since the publication of the WHO guideline review; 17 could be included in the final analyses. Overall, no evidence for a reduction of SSI after the use of high FiO2 was found [relative risk (RR): 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73–1.07]. There was evidence that high FiO2 was beneficial in intubated patients [RR: 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64–0.99)], but not in non-intubated patients [RR: 1.20 (95% CI: 0.91–1.58); test of interaction; P=0.048]. Conclusions: The WHO updated analyses did not show definite beneficial effect of the use of high perioperative FiO2, overall, but there was evidence of effect of reducing the SSI risk in surgical patients under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. However, the evidence for this beneficial effect has become weaker and the strength of the recommendation needs to be reconsidered.

KW - general anaesthesia

KW - hyperoxia

KW - postoperative outcome

KW - surgical site infection

KW - surgical wound infection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059470662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059470662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.024

DO - 10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.024

M3 - Article

C2 - 30770050

AN - SCOPUS:85059470662

JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 0007-0912

ER -