Effect of preoperative vitreous status on visual outcomes following vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane repair

Courtney Kraus, P. Kumar Rao, Rajendra S. Apte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To determine the correlation between clinically observed posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and both surgical status of the hyaloid and the visual outcome following epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery. Design: Retrospective chart review. Participants: One hundred and nine eyes of 109 consecutive patients who underwent vitrectomy and repair of idiopathic ERM between January 2006 and September 2008. Methods: Preoperative exam notes from selected charts were reviewed for the presence or absence of a PVD. Operative notes were queried to whether the hyaloid was attached or detached at the onset of surgery. The postoperative visual acuity (VA) was correlated with the intraoperative status of the hyaloid. Preoperative observation of PVD was correlated with the hyaloid status at the time of vitrectomy. Results: Hyaloid status did not impact postoperative VA. Eyes with an attached hyaloid at the onset of surgery had an average postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/60 and eyes with PVDs found during surgery had an average BCVA of 20/60+1 (p = 0.66). Of the 109 patients, 72 had a preoperative fundoscopic examination whose results positively correlated with the intraoperative status of the hyaloid. Conclusions: Having an attached hyaloid did not have a significant impact on postoperative visual outcomes in eyes undergoing ERM when compared with outcomes for eyes having a detached hyaloids prior to surgery. Detection of a PVD on preoperative fundoscopic examination was highly sensitive for a "true" PVD, i.e., actual detachment of the posterior hyaloid membrane as confirmed during surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)186-190
Number of pages5
JournalCanadian Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Epiretinal Membrane
Vitreous Detachment
Vitrectomy
Visual Acuity
Observation
Membranes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Effect of preoperative vitreous status on visual outcomes following vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane repair. / Kraus, Courtney; Rao, P. Kumar; Apte, Rajendra S.

In: Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2011, p. 186-190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b66a27aca68045cc9a32ec5e4148f97c,
title = "Effect of preoperative vitreous status on visual outcomes following vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane repair",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the correlation between clinically observed posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and both surgical status of the hyaloid and the visual outcome following epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery. Design: Retrospective chart review. Participants: One hundred and nine eyes of 109 consecutive patients who underwent vitrectomy and repair of idiopathic ERM between January 2006 and September 2008. Methods: Preoperative exam notes from selected charts were reviewed for the presence or absence of a PVD. Operative notes were queried to whether the hyaloid was attached or detached at the onset of surgery. The postoperative visual acuity (VA) was correlated with the intraoperative status of the hyaloid. Preoperative observation of PVD was correlated with the hyaloid status at the time of vitrectomy. Results: Hyaloid status did not impact postoperative VA. Eyes with an attached hyaloid at the onset of surgery had an average postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/60 and eyes with PVDs found during surgery had an average BCVA of 20/60+1 (p = 0.66). Of the 109 patients, 72 had a preoperative fundoscopic examination whose results positively correlated with the intraoperative status of the hyaloid. Conclusions: Having an attached hyaloid did not have a significant impact on postoperative visual outcomes in eyes undergoing ERM when compared with outcomes for eyes having a detached hyaloids prior to surgery. Detection of a PVD on preoperative fundoscopic examination was highly sensitive for a {"}true{"} PVD, i.e., actual detachment of the posterior hyaloid membrane as confirmed during surgery.",
author = "Courtney Kraus and Rao, {P. Kumar} and Apte, {Rajendra S.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.3129/i10-100",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "186--190",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0008-4182",
publisher = "Canadian Ophthalmological Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of preoperative vitreous status on visual outcomes following vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane repair

AU - Kraus, Courtney

AU - Rao, P. Kumar

AU - Apte, Rajendra S.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Objective: To determine the correlation between clinically observed posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and both surgical status of the hyaloid and the visual outcome following epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery. Design: Retrospective chart review. Participants: One hundred and nine eyes of 109 consecutive patients who underwent vitrectomy and repair of idiopathic ERM between January 2006 and September 2008. Methods: Preoperative exam notes from selected charts were reviewed for the presence or absence of a PVD. Operative notes were queried to whether the hyaloid was attached or detached at the onset of surgery. The postoperative visual acuity (VA) was correlated with the intraoperative status of the hyaloid. Preoperative observation of PVD was correlated with the hyaloid status at the time of vitrectomy. Results: Hyaloid status did not impact postoperative VA. Eyes with an attached hyaloid at the onset of surgery had an average postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/60 and eyes with PVDs found during surgery had an average BCVA of 20/60+1 (p = 0.66). Of the 109 patients, 72 had a preoperative fundoscopic examination whose results positively correlated with the intraoperative status of the hyaloid. Conclusions: Having an attached hyaloid did not have a significant impact on postoperative visual outcomes in eyes undergoing ERM when compared with outcomes for eyes having a detached hyaloids prior to surgery. Detection of a PVD on preoperative fundoscopic examination was highly sensitive for a "true" PVD, i.e., actual detachment of the posterior hyaloid membrane as confirmed during surgery.

AB - Objective: To determine the correlation between clinically observed posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and both surgical status of the hyaloid and the visual outcome following epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery. Design: Retrospective chart review. Participants: One hundred and nine eyes of 109 consecutive patients who underwent vitrectomy and repair of idiopathic ERM between January 2006 and September 2008. Methods: Preoperative exam notes from selected charts were reviewed for the presence or absence of a PVD. Operative notes were queried to whether the hyaloid was attached or detached at the onset of surgery. The postoperative visual acuity (VA) was correlated with the intraoperative status of the hyaloid. Preoperative observation of PVD was correlated with the hyaloid status at the time of vitrectomy. Results: Hyaloid status did not impact postoperative VA. Eyes with an attached hyaloid at the onset of surgery had an average postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/60 and eyes with PVDs found during surgery had an average BCVA of 20/60+1 (p = 0.66). Of the 109 patients, 72 had a preoperative fundoscopic examination whose results positively correlated with the intraoperative status of the hyaloid. Conclusions: Having an attached hyaloid did not have a significant impact on postoperative visual outcomes in eyes undergoing ERM when compared with outcomes for eyes having a detached hyaloids prior to surgery. Detection of a PVD on preoperative fundoscopic examination was highly sensitive for a "true" PVD, i.e., actual detachment of the posterior hyaloid membrane as confirmed during surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052554201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052554201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3129/i10-100

DO - 10.3129/i10-100

M3 - Article

C2 - 21708089

AN - SCOPUS:80052554201

VL - 46

SP - 186

EP - 190

JO - Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0008-4182

IS - 2

ER -