Effect of non-normality and low count variants on cross-phenotype association tests in GWAS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Many complex human diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, are characterized by multiple underlying traits/phenotypes that have substantially shared genetic architecture. Multivariate analysis of correlated traits has the potential to increase the power of detecting underlying common genetic loci. Several cross-phenotype association methods have been proposed—some require individual-level data on traits and genotypes, while the others require only summary-level data. In this article, we explore whether non-normality of multivariate trait distribution affects the inference from some of the existing multi-trait methods and how that effect is dependent on the allele count of the genetic variant being tested. We find that most of these tests are susceptible to biases that lead to spurious association signals. Even after controlling for confounders that may contribute to non-normality and then applying inverse normal transformation on the residuals of each trait, these tests may have inflated type I errors for variants with low minor allele counts (MACs). A likelihood ratio test of association based on the ordinal regression of individual-level genotype conditional on the traits seems to be the least biased and can maintain type I error when the MAC is reasonably large (e.g., MAC > 30). Application of these methods to publicly available summary statistics of eight amino acid traits on European samples seem to exhibit systematic inflation (especially for variants with low MAC), which is consistent with our findings from simulation experiments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)300-312
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Journal of Human Genetics
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of non-normality and low count variants on cross-phenotype association tests in GWAS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this