Effect of horizontal vergence on the motor and sensory components of vertical fusion

Naoto Hara, Heimo Steffen, Dale C. Roberts, David Samuel Zee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE. To compare motor and sensory capabilities for fusion of vertical disparities at different angles of horizontal vergence in healthy humans. METHODS. Eye movements were recorded from both eyes of 12 healthy subjects using three-axis search coils. The stimulus was a cross (+) (3.4 x 3.2°, vertically and horizontally, respectively) presented to each eye with a stereoscopic display. Vertical disparities were introduced by adjusting the vertical position of the cross in front of one eye. The disparity was increased in small increments (0.08°) every 8 seconds. Viewing was defined as 'near' if there was a horizontal disparity that elicited 6°to 15°convergence, depending on the subject's capability for horizontal fusion; viewing was defined as 'far' at 1°convergence. Maximum motor (measured), sensory (stimulus minus motor), and total (motor plus sensory) vertical fusion were compared. RESULTS. In 9 (75%) of 12 subjects the maximum total vertical fusion was more in near than in far viewing. The three who did not show this effect had relatively weak horizontal fusion. For the entire group, the motor component differed significantly between far (mean, 1.42°) and near (mean, 2.13°). Total vertical fusion capability (motor plus sensory) also differed significantly between far (mean, 1.68°) and near (mean, 2.39°). For the sensory component there was no difference between between far (mean, 0.268°) and near (mean, 0.270°). As vertical disparity increased in a single trial, however, there was a small gradual increase of the contribution of the sensory component to vertical fusion. CONCLUSIONS. Vertical fusion capability usually increases with convergence. This increase is caused primarily by an increase in the motor component. There is a gradual but small increase in the sensory component as target disparity slowly increases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2268-2276
Number of pages9
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume39
Issue number12
StatePublished - Nov 1998

Fingerprint

Eye Movements
Healthy Volunteers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Effect of horizontal vergence on the motor and sensory components of vertical fusion. / Hara, Naoto; Steffen, Heimo; Roberts, Dale C.; Zee, David Samuel.

In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 39, No. 12, 11.1998, p. 2268-2276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0bffbc614082417a8ad2daf81dae1447,
title = "Effect of horizontal vergence on the motor and sensory components of vertical fusion",
abstract = "PURPOSE. To compare motor and sensory capabilities for fusion of vertical disparities at different angles of horizontal vergence in healthy humans. METHODS. Eye movements were recorded from both eyes of 12 healthy subjects using three-axis search coils. The stimulus was a cross (+) (3.4 x 3.2°, vertically and horizontally, respectively) presented to each eye with a stereoscopic display. Vertical disparities were introduced by adjusting the vertical position of the cross in front of one eye. The disparity was increased in small increments (0.08°) every 8 seconds. Viewing was defined as 'near' if there was a horizontal disparity that elicited 6°to 15°convergence, depending on the subject's capability for horizontal fusion; viewing was defined as 'far' at 1°convergence. Maximum motor (measured), sensory (stimulus minus motor), and total (motor plus sensory) vertical fusion were compared. RESULTS. In 9 (75{\%}) of 12 subjects the maximum total vertical fusion was more in near than in far viewing. The three who did not show this effect had relatively weak horizontal fusion. For the entire group, the motor component differed significantly between far (mean, 1.42°) and near (mean, 2.13°). Total vertical fusion capability (motor plus sensory) also differed significantly between far (mean, 1.68°) and near (mean, 2.39°). For the sensory component there was no difference between between far (mean, 0.268°) and near (mean, 0.270°). As vertical disparity increased in a single trial, however, there was a small gradual increase of the contribution of the sensory component to vertical fusion. CONCLUSIONS. Vertical fusion capability usually increases with convergence. This increase is caused primarily by an increase in the motor component. There is a gradual but small increase in the sensory component as target disparity slowly increases.",
author = "Naoto Hara and Heimo Steffen and Roberts, {Dale C.} and Zee, {David Samuel}",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "2268--2276",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
issn = "0146-0404",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of horizontal vergence on the motor and sensory components of vertical fusion

AU - Hara, Naoto

AU - Steffen, Heimo

AU - Roberts, Dale C.

AU - Zee, David Samuel

PY - 1998/11

Y1 - 1998/11

N2 - PURPOSE. To compare motor and sensory capabilities for fusion of vertical disparities at different angles of horizontal vergence in healthy humans. METHODS. Eye movements were recorded from both eyes of 12 healthy subjects using three-axis search coils. The stimulus was a cross (+) (3.4 x 3.2°, vertically and horizontally, respectively) presented to each eye with a stereoscopic display. Vertical disparities were introduced by adjusting the vertical position of the cross in front of one eye. The disparity was increased in small increments (0.08°) every 8 seconds. Viewing was defined as 'near' if there was a horizontal disparity that elicited 6°to 15°convergence, depending on the subject's capability for horizontal fusion; viewing was defined as 'far' at 1°convergence. Maximum motor (measured), sensory (stimulus minus motor), and total (motor plus sensory) vertical fusion were compared. RESULTS. In 9 (75%) of 12 subjects the maximum total vertical fusion was more in near than in far viewing. The three who did not show this effect had relatively weak horizontal fusion. For the entire group, the motor component differed significantly between far (mean, 1.42°) and near (mean, 2.13°). Total vertical fusion capability (motor plus sensory) also differed significantly between far (mean, 1.68°) and near (mean, 2.39°). For the sensory component there was no difference between between far (mean, 0.268°) and near (mean, 0.270°). As vertical disparity increased in a single trial, however, there was a small gradual increase of the contribution of the sensory component to vertical fusion. CONCLUSIONS. Vertical fusion capability usually increases with convergence. This increase is caused primarily by an increase in the motor component. There is a gradual but small increase in the sensory component as target disparity slowly increases.

AB - PURPOSE. To compare motor and sensory capabilities for fusion of vertical disparities at different angles of horizontal vergence in healthy humans. METHODS. Eye movements were recorded from both eyes of 12 healthy subjects using three-axis search coils. The stimulus was a cross (+) (3.4 x 3.2°, vertically and horizontally, respectively) presented to each eye with a stereoscopic display. Vertical disparities were introduced by adjusting the vertical position of the cross in front of one eye. The disparity was increased in small increments (0.08°) every 8 seconds. Viewing was defined as 'near' if there was a horizontal disparity that elicited 6°to 15°convergence, depending on the subject's capability for horizontal fusion; viewing was defined as 'far' at 1°convergence. Maximum motor (measured), sensory (stimulus minus motor), and total (motor plus sensory) vertical fusion were compared. RESULTS. In 9 (75%) of 12 subjects the maximum total vertical fusion was more in near than in far viewing. The three who did not show this effect had relatively weak horizontal fusion. For the entire group, the motor component differed significantly between far (mean, 1.42°) and near (mean, 2.13°). Total vertical fusion capability (motor plus sensory) also differed significantly between far (mean, 1.68°) and near (mean, 2.39°). For the sensory component there was no difference between between far (mean, 0.268°) and near (mean, 0.270°). As vertical disparity increased in a single trial, however, there was a small gradual increase of the contribution of the sensory component to vertical fusion. CONCLUSIONS. Vertical fusion capability usually increases with convergence. This increase is caused primarily by an increase in the motor component. There is a gradual but small increase in the sensory component as target disparity slowly increases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031733233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031733233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 2268

EP - 2276

JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

SN - 0146-0404

IS - 12

ER -