Effect of distractions on operative performance and ability to multitask-A case for deliberate practice

Aadil Ahmed, Mueen Ahmad, Charles Matthew Stewart, Howard W. Francis, Nasir Islam Bhatti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis To measure the effect of distractions on the operative performance and analyze if practice and experience are the factors that can help to overcome the distractions. Study Design Prospective observational study. Methods Ten postgraduate year (PGY) 2-6 residents and two faculty members from Johns Hopkins' otolaryngology department were recruited and asked to deepen the dissection at the sinodural angle on the Voxel-man mastoidectomy simulator. They were asked to perform the task under four conditions: 1) no distractors, 2) differentiation and counting of a specific alarm sound among different sounds played in the background while performing the surgical task, 3) simultaneous performance of simple arithmetic task of moderate difficulty, and 4) simultaneous performance of the task with both sets of distractors combined. Results Time taken for the task (P = .02) and error scores (P = .002) increased under the third and fourth conditions. The ability to multitask and response to surgical and cognitive tasks improved with increasing level of experience of the participants. Conclusions Distractions lead to impaired dexterity and an increase in the incidence of errors. However, experience and deliberate practice can help achieve the ability to multitask without compromising the operative performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)837-841
Number of pages5
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume125
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Otolaryngology
Task Performance and Analysis
Observational Studies
Dissection
Prospective Studies
Incidence

Keywords

  • deliberate practice
  • Distraction
  • dual-tasking
  • multitasking
  • otolaryngology
  • surgical education
  • surgical skills

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effect of distractions on operative performance and ability to multitask-A case for deliberate practice. / Ahmed, Aadil; Ahmad, Mueen; Stewart, Charles Matthew; Francis, Howard W.; Bhatti, Nasir Islam.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 125, No. 4, 01.04.2015, p. 837-841.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{11287f1bc595446c9cafd35e386f89c2,
title = "Effect of distractions on operative performance and ability to multitask-A case for deliberate practice",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis To measure the effect of distractions on the operative performance and analyze if practice and experience are the factors that can help to overcome the distractions. Study Design Prospective observational study. Methods Ten postgraduate year (PGY) 2-6 residents and two faculty members from Johns Hopkins' otolaryngology department were recruited and asked to deepen the dissection at the sinodural angle on the Voxel-man mastoidectomy simulator. They were asked to perform the task under four conditions: 1) no distractors, 2) differentiation and counting of a specific alarm sound among different sounds played in the background while performing the surgical task, 3) simultaneous performance of simple arithmetic task of moderate difficulty, and 4) simultaneous performance of the task with both sets of distractors combined. Results Time taken for the task (P = .02) and error scores (P = .002) increased under the third and fourth conditions. The ability to multitask and response to surgical and cognitive tasks improved with increasing level of experience of the participants. Conclusions Distractions lead to impaired dexterity and an increase in the incidence of errors. However, experience and deliberate practice can help achieve the ability to multitask without compromising the operative performance.",
keywords = "deliberate practice, Distraction, dual-tasking, multitasking, otolaryngology, surgical education, surgical skills",
author = "Aadil Ahmed and Mueen Ahmad and Stewart, {Charles Matthew} and Francis, {Howard W.} and Bhatti, {Nasir Islam}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.24856",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "837--841",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of distractions on operative performance and ability to multitask-A case for deliberate practice

AU - Ahmed, Aadil

AU - Ahmad, Mueen

AU - Stewart, Charles Matthew

AU - Francis, Howard W.

AU - Bhatti, Nasir Islam

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis To measure the effect of distractions on the operative performance and analyze if practice and experience are the factors that can help to overcome the distractions. Study Design Prospective observational study. Methods Ten postgraduate year (PGY) 2-6 residents and two faculty members from Johns Hopkins' otolaryngology department were recruited and asked to deepen the dissection at the sinodural angle on the Voxel-man mastoidectomy simulator. They were asked to perform the task under four conditions: 1) no distractors, 2) differentiation and counting of a specific alarm sound among different sounds played in the background while performing the surgical task, 3) simultaneous performance of simple arithmetic task of moderate difficulty, and 4) simultaneous performance of the task with both sets of distractors combined. Results Time taken for the task (P = .02) and error scores (P = .002) increased under the third and fourth conditions. The ability to multitask and response to surgical and cognitive tasks improved with increasing level of experience of the participants. Conclusions Distractions lead to impaired dexterity and an increase in the incidence of errors. However, experience and deliberate practice can help achieve the ability to multitask without compromising the operative performance.

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis To measure the effect of distractions on the operative performance and analyze if practice and experience are the factors that can help to overcome the distractions. Study Design Prospective observational study. Methods Ten postgraduate year (PGY) 2-6 residents and two faculty members from Johns Hopkins' otolaryngology department were recruited and asked to deepen the dissection at the sinodural angle on the Voxel-man mastoidectomy simulator. They were asked to perform the task under four conditions: 1) no distractors, 2) differentiation and counting of a specific alarm sound among different sounds played in the background while performing the surgical task, 3) simultaneous performance of simple arithmetic task of moderate difficulty, and 4) simultaneous performance of the task with both sets of distractors combined. Results Time taken for the task (P = .02) and error scores (P = .002) increased under the third and fourth conditions. The ability to multitask and response to surgical and cognitive tasks improved with increasing level of experience of the participants. Conclusions Distractions lead to impaired dexterity and an increase in the incidence of errors. However, experience and deliberate practice can help achieve the ability to multitask without compromising the operative performance.

KW - deliberate practice

KW - Distraction

KW - dual-tasking

KW - multitasking

KW - otolaryngology

KW - surgical education

KW - surgical skills

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925668311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925668311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.24856

DO - 10.1002/lary.24856

M3 - Article

C2 - 25073874

AN - SCOPUS:84925668311

VL - 125

SP - 837

EP - 841

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 4

ER -