Education and training initiatives for crisis management in the European Union: A web-based analysis of available programs

Pier Luigi Ingrassia, Marco Foletti, Ahmadreza Djalali, Piercarlo Scarone, Luca Ragazzoni, Francesco Della Corte, Kubilay Kaptan, Olivera Lupescu, Chris Arculeo, Gotz Von Arnim, Tom Friedl, Michael Ashkenazi, Deike Heselmann, Boris Hreckovski, Amir Khorrram-Manesh, Radko Komadina, Kostanze Lechner, Cristina Patru, Frederick M. Burkle, Philipp Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction Education and training are key elements of disaster management. Despite national and international educational programs in disaster management, there is no standardized curriculum available to guide the European Union (EU) member states. European- based Disaster Training Curriculum (DITAC), a multiple university-based project financially supported by the EU, is charged with developing a holistic and highly-structured curriculum and courses for responders and crisis managers at a strategic and tactical level. The purpose of this study is to qualitatively assess the prevailing preferences and characteristics of disaster management educational and training initiatives (ETIs) at a postgraduate level that currently exist in the EU countries. Methods An Internet-based qualitative search was conducted in 2012 to identify and analyze the current training programs in disaster management. The course characteristics were evaluated for curriculum, teaching methods, modality of delivery, target groups, and funding. Results The literature search identified 140 ETIs, the majority (78%) located in United Kingdom, France, and Germany. Master level degrees were the primary certificates granted to graduates. Face-to-face education was the most common teaching method (84%). Approximately 80% of the training initiatives offered multi- and cross-disciplinary disaster management content. A competency-based approach to curriculum content was present in 61% of the programs. Emergency responders at the tactical level were the main target group. Almost all programs were self-funded. Conclusion Although ETIs currently exist, they are not broadly available in all 27 EU countries. Also, the curricula do not cover all key elements of disaster management in a standardized and competency-based structure. This study has identified the need to develop a standardized competency-based educational and training program for all European countries that will ensure the practice and policies that meet both the standards of care and the broader expectations for professionalization of the disaster and crisis workforce.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)115-126
Number of pages12
JournalPrehospital and disaster medicine
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2014

Keywords

  • Crisis management education and training
  • ELRHA
  • European Union
  • humanitarian health
  • professionalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Education and training initiatives for crisis management in the European Union: A web-based analysis of available programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this