Economic evaluation of HIV prevention programs

David R Holtgrave, Noreen L. Qualls, John D. Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Program managers and policy makers need to balance the costs and benefits of various interventions when planning and evaluating HIV prevention programs. Resources to fund these programs are limited and must be used judiciously to maximize the number of HIV infections averted. Economic evaluation studies of HIV prevention interventions, which we review and critique here, can provide some of the needed information. Special emphasis is given to studies dealing with interventions to reduce or avoid HIV- related risk behaviors. Ninety-three cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses were identified overall. However, only 28 dealt with domestic, behavior change interventions; the remainder focused on screening and testing without prevention counseling, and on care and treatment services. There are compelling demonstrations that behavioral interventions can be cost-effective and even cost-saving. The threshold conditions under which these programs can be considered cost-effective or cost-saving are well defined. However, several important intervention types and multiple key populations have gone unstudied. Research in these areas is urgently needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)467-488
Number of pages22
JournalAnnual Review of Public Health
Volume17
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
HIV
Costs and Cost Analysis
Financial Management
Risk-Taking
Administrative Personnel
HIV Infections
Counseling
Research
Population

Keywords

  • AIDS
  • cost
  • evaluation
  • HIV
  • prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Economic evaluation of HIV prevention programs. / Holtgrave, David R; Qualls, Noreen L.; Graham, John D.

In: Annual Review of Public Health, Vol. 17, 1996, p. 467-488.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holtgrave, David R ; Qualls, Noreen L. ; Graham, John D. / Economic evaluation of HIV prevention programs. In: Annual Review of Public Health. 1996 ; Vol. 17. pp. 467-488.
@article{d1eb92332ca547e79329243fe207ef6f,
title = "Economic evaluation of HIV prevention programs",
abstract = "Program managers and policy makers need to balance the costs and benefits of various interventions when planning and evaluating HIV prevention programs. Resources to fund these programs are limited and must be used judiciously to maximize the number of HIV infections averted. Economic evaluation studies of HIV prevention interventions, which we review and critique here, can provide some of the needed information. Special emphasis is given to studies dealing with interventions to reduce or avoid HIV- related risk behaviors. Ninety-three cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses were identified overall. However, only 28 dealt with domestic, behavior change interventions; the remainder focused on screening and testing without prevention counseling, and on care and treatment services. There are compelling demonstrations that behavioral interventions can be cost-effective and even cost-saving. The threshold conditions under which these programs can be considered cost-effective or cost-saving are well defined. However, several important intervention types and multiple key populations have gone unstudied. Research in these areas is urgently needed.",
keywords = "AIDS, cost, evaluation, HIV, prevention",
author = "Holtgrave, {David R} and Qualls, {Noreen L.} and Graham, {John D.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "467--488",
journal = "Annual Review of Public Health",
issn = "0163-7525",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic evaluation of HIV prevention programs

AU - Holtgrave, David R

AU - Qualls, Noreen L.

AU - Graham, John D.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Program managers and policy makers need to balance the costs and benefits of various interventions when planning and evaluating HIV prevention programs. Resources to fund these programs are limited and must be used judiciously to maximize the number of HIV infections averted. Economic evaluation studies of HIV prevention interventions, which we review and critique here, can provide some of the needed information. Special emphasis is given to studies dealing with interventions to reduce or avoid HIV- related risk behaviors. Ninety-three cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses were identified overall. However, only 28 dealt with domestic, behavior change interventions; the remainder focused on screening and testing without prevention counseling, and on care and treatment services. There are compelling demonstrations that behavioral interventions can be cost-effective and even cost-saving. The threshold conditions under which these programs can be considered cost-effective or cost-saving are well defined. However, several important intervention types and multiple key populations have gone unstudied. Research in these areas is urgently needed.

AB - Program managers and policy makers need to balance the costs and benefits of various interventions when planning and evaluating HIV prevention programs. Resources to fund these programs are limited and must be used judiciously to maximize the number of HIV infections averted. Economic evaluation studies of HIV prevention interventions, which we review and critique here, can provide some of the needed information. Special emphasis is given to studies dealing with interventions to reduce or avoid HIV- related risk behaviors. Ninety-three cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses were identified overall. However, only 28 dealt with domestic, behavior change interventions; the remainder focused on screening and testing without prevention counseling, and on care and treatment services. There are compelling demonstrations that behavioral interventions can be cost-effective and even cost-saving. The threshold conditions under which these programs can be considered cost-effective or cost-saving are well defined. However, several important intervention types and multiple key populations have gone unstudied. Research in these areas is urgently needed.

KW - AIDS

KW - cost

KW - evaluation

KW - HIV

KW - prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029918824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029918824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8724236

AN - SCOPUS:0029918824

VL - 17

SP - 467

EP - 488

JO - Annual Review of Public Health

JF - Annual Review of Public Health

SN - 0163-7525

ER -