Economic evaluation of HIV prevention programs

David R. Holtgrave, Noreen L. Qualls, John D. Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

65 Scopus citations


Program managers and policy makers need to balance the costs and benefits of various interventions when planning and evaluating HIV prevention programs. Resources to fund these programs are limited and must be used judiciously to maximize the number of HIV infections averted. Economic evaluation studies of HIV prevention interventions, which we review and critique here, can provide some of the needed information. Special emphasis is given to studies dealing with interventions to reduce or avoid HIV- related risk behaviors. Ninety-three cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses were identified overall. However, only 28 dealt with domestic, behavior change interventions; the remainder focused on screening and testing without prevention counseling, and on care and treatment services. There are compelling demonstrations that behavioral interventions can be cost-effective and even cost-saving. The threshold conditions under which these programs can be considered cost-effective or cost-saving are well defined. However, several important intervention types and multiple key populations have gone unstudied. Research in these areas is urgently needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)467-488
Number of pages22
JournalAnnual review of public health
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes


  • AIDS
  • HIV
  • cost
  • evaluation
  • prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health


Dive into the research topics of 'Economic evaluation of HIV prevention programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this