Economic evaluation of blind rehabilitation for veterans with macular diseases in the Department of Veterans Affairs

Kevin T. Stroupe, Joan A. Stelmack, X. Charlene Tang, Domenic J. Reda, D'Anna Moran, Stephen Rinne, Rickilyn Mancil, Yongliang Wei, Roger Cummings, Gary Mancil, Nancy Ellis, Robert W. Massof

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT) developed an outpatient low-vision programme for patients with macular diseases providing low-vision rehabilitation comparable to VA inpatient blind rehabilitation centres (BRCs). This programme targets veterans who do not need or chose not to participate in a comprehensive inpatient blind rehabilitation programme. We examined costs and consequences using veterans in LOVIT and comparable veterans in an inpatient BRC. Methods: We compared costs and consequences between treatment patients who participated in LOVIT, a two-site randomized clinical trial, and a sample of comparable patients who received treatment at a VA inpatient BRC. We measured consequences as the change in functional visual ability from baseline to follow-up (LOVIT: 4 months after randomization; BRC: 3 months after discharge) using the VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VA LV VFQ-48). Results: There were 55 LOVIT and 121 BRC patients for our analyses. Average costs were $38,627.3 higher for BRC patients ($5,054.4 ± $404.7 SD for LOVIT vs. $43,681.7 ± $8,853.6 SD for BRC, p < 0.0001). Thus, the BRC cost $38,627.3 per patient more than the LOVIT programme (95% CI: $17,414 to $273,482). There was a greater improvement in overall visual ability, mobility, and visual motor skill scores for BRC patients; however, there was no significant difference in improvement in reading ability or visual information processing scores. Conclusions: As VA increases outpatient blind rehabilitation services, LOVIT provides a model for expanding outpatient low-vision rehabilitation services for veterans at substantially lower costs than current inpatient BRC services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-91
Number of pages8
JournalOphthalmic Epidemiology
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008

Keywords

  • Blindness
  • Cost Analysis
  • Low Vision
  • Outpatient
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Economic evaluation of blind rehabilitation for veterans with macular diseases in the Department of Veterans Affairs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this