Economic burden associated with acute myeloid leukemia treatment

Amer M. Zeidan, Dalia Mahmoud, Izabela T. Kucmin-Bemelmans, Cathelijne J.M. Alleman, Marja Hensen, Barry Skikne, B. Douglas Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The economic burden associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is poorly defined and understudied. The goal of this study is estimate the direct cost of illness for AML in the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK), by conducting a comprehensive literature review and calculating the average direct cost-of-illness per patient for the first 6 months of therapy. Patients were grouped by therapy: intensive chemotherapy alone; induction chemotherapy followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT); low intensity therapy; and best supportive care. Data suggest that the pathways alloSCT, followed by intensive chemotherapy, are associated with the highest direct costs. Calculated direct costs suggest that they are higher in the US ($14,014 for BSC-only to $352,682 for alloSCT) than in the UK (f3708 [$5837] for BSC-only to f112,545 [$177,187]). AML appears to be associated with significant direct economic costs, but more studies are needed to fully assess the economic impact especially in relation to total and indirect costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-89
Number of pages11
JournalExpert review of hematology
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Keywords

  • Acute myeloid leukemia
  • Chemotherapy
  • Cost of illness
  • Economic burden
  • Literature review
  • Stem cell transplantation
  • Treatment costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Economic burden associated with acute myeloid leukemia treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Zeidan, A. M., Mahmoud, D., Kucmin-Bemelmans, I. T., Alleman, C. J. M., Hensen, M., Skikne, B., & Douglas Smith, B. (2016). Economic burden associated with acute myeloid leukemia treatment. Expert review of hematology, 9(1), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1586/17474086.2016.1112735