Early Versus Delayed Surgery in Gallstone Pancreatitis

William C. Dooley, John L Cameron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The correct timing of surgery in cases of gallstone pancreatitis is debatable. To delineate more clearly the influence of the timing of surgery in the treatment of the disease, a prospective randomized clinical study of early surgery (less than 48 hours after admission) and delayed surgery (more than 48 hours after admission) was conducted in 165 patients. Ranson’s prognostic signs of severity of disease were used to classify the patients into two risk groups: mild pancreatitis (three or fewer positive signs) and severe pancreatitis (more than three positive signs). In patients with three or fewer positive Ranson’s signs, the time of surgery appeared to have little effect on the outcome, whereas in patients with more than three positive signs, early surgery resulted in a significant increase in rates of morbidity and mortality. Controlled randomization showed that in patients with gallstone pancreatitis, edematous or hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis can develop, with or without inpacted stones, early or late in the progression of the disease, during early or delayed surgery. These findings suggest that (1) although a gallstone initiates a bout of pancreatitis, it does not cause the progression of the disease; (2) the fate of the progression of pancreatitis is decided early by the amount of digestive enzymes being activated; (3) early removal of an impacted stone does not ameliorate the progression of pancreatitis; and (4) surgery should be performed during the initial hospital admission after the pancreatitis has subsided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)363-366
Number of pages4
JournalHPB Surgery
Volume1
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Gallstones
Pancreatitis
Disease Progression
Random Allocation
Morbidity
Mortality
Enzymes

Keywords

  • biliary surgery
  • endoscopic sphincterotomy
  • Gallstone pancreatitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Early Versus Delayed Surgery in Gallstone Pancreatitis. / Dooley, William C.; Cameron, John L.

In: HPB Surgery, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1989, p. 363-366.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dooley, William C. ; Cameron, John L. / Early Versus Delayed Surgery in Gallstone Pancreatitis. In: HPB Surgery. 1989 ; Vol. 1, No. 4. pp. 363-366.
@article{a1e7020d471a4345a49280f8b7ae4bd0,
title = "Early Versus Delayed Surgery in Gallstone Pancreatitis",
abstract = "The correct timing of surgery in cases of gallstone pancreatitis is debatable. To delineate more clearly the influence of the timing of surgery in the treatment of the disease, a prospective randomized clinical study of early surgery (less than 48 hours after admission) and delayed surgery (more than 48 hours after admission) was conducted in 165 patients. Ranson’s prognostic signs of severity of disease were used to classify the patients into two risk groups: mild pancreatitis (three or fewer positive signs) and severe pancreatitis (more than three positive signs). In patients with three or fewer positive Ranson’s signs, the time of surgery appeared to have little effect on the outcome, whereas in patients with more than three positive signs, early surgery resulted in a significant increase in rates of morbidity and mortality. Controlled randomization showed that in patients with gallstone pancreatitis, edematous or hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis can develop, with or without inpacted stones, early or late in the progression of the disease, during early or delayed surgery. These findings suggest that (1) although a gallstone initiates a bout of pancreatitis, it does not cause the progression of the disease; (2) the fate of the progression of pancreatitis is decided early by the amount of digestive enzymes being activated; (3) early removal of an impacted stone does not ameliorate the progression of pancreatitis; and (4) surgery should be performed during the initial hospital admission after the pancreatitis has subsided.",
keywords = "biliary surgery, endoscopic sphincterotomy, Gallstone pancreatitis",
author = "Dooley, {William C.} and Cameron, {John L}",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1155/1989/53232",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "363--366",
journal = "HPB Surgery",
issn = "0894-8569",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early Versus Delayed Surgery in Gallstone Pancreatitis

AU - Dooley, William C.

AU - Cameron, John L

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - The correct timing of surgery in cases of gallstone pancreatitis is debatable. To delineate more clearly the influence of the timing of surgery in the treatment of the disease, a prospective randomized clinical study of early surgery (less than 48 hours after admission) and delayed surgery (more than 48 hours after admission) was conducted in 165 patients. Ranson’s prognostic signs of severity of disease were used to classify the patients into two risk groups: mild pancreatitis (three or fewer positive signs) and severe pancreatitis (more than three positive signs). In patients with three or fewer positive Ranson’s signs, the time of surgery appeared to have little effect on the outcome, whereas in patients with more than three positive signs, early surgery resulted in a significant increase in rates of morbidity and mortality. Controlled randomization showed that in patients with gallstone pancreatitis, edematous or hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis can develop, with or without inpacted stones, early or late in the progression of the disease, during early or delayed surgery. These findings suggest that (1) although a gallstone initiates a bout of pancreatitis, it does not cause the progression of the disease; (2) the fate of the progression of pancreatitis is decided early by the amount of digestive enzymes being activated; (3) early removal of an impacted stone does not ameliorate the progression of pancreatitis; and (4) surgery should be performed during the initial hospital admission after the pancreatitis has subsided.

AB - The correct timing of surgery in cases of gallstone pancreatitis is debatable. To delineate more clearly the influence of the timing of surgery in the treatment of the disease, a prospective randomized clinical study of early surgery (less than 48 hours after admission) and delayed surgery (more than 48 hours after admission) was conducted in 165 patients. Ranson’s prognostic signs of severity of disease were used to classify the patients into two risk groups: mild pancreatitis (three or fewer positive signs) and severe pancreatitis (more than three positive signs). In patients with three or fewer positive Ranson’s signs, the time of surgery appeared to have little effect on the outcome, whereas in patients with more than three positive signs, early surgery resulted in a significant increase in rates of morbidity and mortality. Controlled randomization showed that in patients with gallstone pancreatitis, edematous or hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis can develop, with or without inpacted stones, early or late in the progression of the disease, during early or delayed surgery. These findings suggest that (1) although a gallstone initiates a bout of pancreatitis, it does not cause the progression of the disease; (2) the fate of the progression of pancreatitis is decided early by the amount of digestive enzymes being activated; (3) early removal of an impacted stone does not ameliorate the progression of pancreatitis; and (4) surgery should be performed during the initial hospital admission after the pancreatitis has subsided.

KW - biliary surgery

KW - endoscopic sphincterotomy

KW - Gallstone pancreatitis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024358117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024358117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/1989/53232

DO - 10.1155/1989/53232

M3 - Article

C2 - 2487077

AN - SCOPUS:0024358117

VL - 1

SP - 363

EP - 366

JO - HPB Surgery

JF - HPB Surgery

SN - 0894-8569

IS - 4

ER -