Dynamic distribution of chemoattractant receptors in living cells during chemotaxis and persistent stimulation

Zhan Xiao, Ning Zhang, Douglas B. Murphy, Peter N Devreotes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While the localization of chemoattractant receptors on randomly oriented cells has been previously studied by immunohistochemistry, the instantaneous distribution of receptors on living cells undergoing directed migration has not been determined. To do this, we replaced cAR1, the primary cAMP receptor of Dictyostelium, with a cAR1-green fluorescence protein fusion construct. We found that this chimeric protein is functionally indistinguishable from wild- type cAR1. By time-lapse imaging of single cells, we observed that the receptors remained evenly distributed on the cell surface and all of its projections during chemotaxis involving turns and reversals of polarity directed by repositioning of a chemoattractant-filled micropipet. Thus, cell polarization cannot result from a gradient-induced asymmetric distribution of chemoattractant receptors. Some newly extended pseudopods at migration fronts showed a transient drop in fluorescence signals, suggesting that the flow of receptors into these zones may slightly lag behind the protrusion process. Challenge with a uniform increase in chemoattractant, sufficient to cause a dramatic decrease in the affinity of surface binding sites and cell desensitization, also did not significantly alter the distribution profile. Hence, the induced reduction in binding activity and cellular sensitivity cannot be due to receptor relocalization. The chimeric receptors were able to 'cap' rapidly during treatment with Con A, suggesting that they are mobile in the plane of the cell membrane. This capping was not influenced by pretreatment with chemoattractant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-374
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Cell Biology
Volume139
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 20 1997

Fingerprint

Formyl Peptide Receptor
Chemotaxis
Chemotactic Factors
Fluorescence
Time-Lapse Imaging
Pseudopodia
Dictyostelium
Proteins
Immunohistochemistry
Binding Sites
Cell Membrane

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Dynamic distribution of chemoattractant receptors in living cells during chemotaxis and persistent stimulation. / Xiao, Zhan; Zhang, Ning; Murphy, Douglas B.; Devreotes, Peter N.

In: Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 139, No. 2, 20.10.1997, p. 365-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e9ab04c0491f4ff593e614cf9d106e5e,
title = "Dynamic distribution of chemoattractant receptors in living cells during chemotaxis and persistent stimulation",
abstract = "While the localization of chemoattractant receptors on randomly oriented cells has been previously studied by immunohistochemistry, the instantaneous distribution of receptors on living cells undergoing directed migration has not been determined. To do this, we replaced cAR1, the primary cAMP receptor of Dictyostelium, with a cAR1-green fluorescence protein fusion construct. We found that this chimeric protein is functionally indistinguishable from wild- type cAR1. By time-lapse imaging of single cells, we observed that the receptors remained evenly distributed on the cell surface and all of its projections during chemotaxis involving turns and reversals of polarity directed by repositioning of a chemoattractant-filled micropipet. Thus, cell polarization cannot result from a gradient-induced asymmetric distribution of chemoattractant receptors. Some newly extended pseudopods at migration fronts showed a transient drop in fluorescence signals, suggesting that the flow of receptors into these zones may slightly lag behind the protrusion process. Challenge with a uniform increase in chemoattractant, sufficient to cause a dramatic decrease in the affinity of surface binding sites and cell desensitization, also did not significantly alter the distribution profile. Hence, the induced reduction in binding activity and cellular sensitivity cannot be due to receptor relocalization. The chimeric receptors were able to 'cap' rapidly during treatment with Con A, suggesting that they are mobile in the plane of the cell membrane. This capping was not influenced by pretreatment with chemoattractant.",
author = "Zhan Xiao and Ning Zhang and Murphy, {Douglas B.} and Devreotes, {Peter N}",
year = "1997",
month = "10",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1083/jcb.139.2.365",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "139",
pages = "365--374",
journal = "Journal of Cell Biology",
issn = "0021-9525",
publisher = "Rockefeller University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dynamic distribution of chemoattractant receptors in living cells during chemotaxis and persistent stimulation

AU - Xiao, Zhan

AU - Zhang, Ning

AU - Murphy, Douglas B.

AU - Devreotes, Peter N

PY - 1997/10/20

Y1 - 1997/10/20

N2 - While the localization of chemoattractant receptors on randomly oriented cells has been previously studied by immunohistochemistry, the instantaneous distribution of receptors on living cells undergoing directed migration has not been determined. To do this, we replaced cAR1, the primary cAMP receptor of Dictyostelium, with a cAR1-green fluorescence protein fusion construct. We found that this chimeric protein is functionally indistinguishable from wild- type cAR1. By time-lapse imaging of single cells, we observed that the receptors remained evenly distributed on the cell surface and all of its projections during chemotaxis involving turns and reversals of polarity directed by repositioning of a chemoattractant-filled micropipet. Thus, cell polarization cannot result from a gradient-induced asymmetric distribution of chemoattractant receptors. Some newly extended pseudopods at migration fronts showed a transient drop in fluorescence signals, suggesting that the flow of receptors into these zones may slightly lag behind the protrusion process. Challenge with a uniform increase in chemoattractant, sufficient to cause a dramatic decrease in the affinity of surface binding sites and cell desensitization, also did not significantly alter the distribution profile. Hence, the induced reduction in binding activity and cellular sensitivity cannot be due to receptor relocalization. The chimeric receptors were able to 'cap' rapidly during treatment with Con A, suggesting that they are mobile in the plane of the cell membrane. This capping was not influenced by pretreatment with chemoattractant.

AB - While the localization of chemoattractant receptors on randomly oriented cells has been previously studied by immunohistochemistry, the instantaneous distribution of receptors on living cells undergoing directed migration has not been determined. To do this, we replaced cAR1, the primary cAMP receptor of Dictyostelium, with a cAR1-green fluorescence protein fusion construct. We found that this chimeric protein is functionally indistinguishable from wild- type cAR1. By time-lapse imaging of single cells, we observed that the receptors remained evenly distributed on the cell surface and all of its projections during chemotaxis involving turns and reversals of polarity directed by repositioning of a chemoattractant-filled micropipet. Thus, cell polarization cannot result from a gradient-induced asymmetric distribution of chemoattractant receptors. Some newly extended pseudopods at migration fronts showed a transient drop in fluorescence signals, suggesting that the flow of receptors into these zones may slightly lag behind the protrusion process. Challenge with a uniform increase in chemoattractant, sufficient to cause a dramatic decrease in the affinity of surface binding sites and cell desensitization, also did not significantly alter the distribution profile. Hence, the induced reduction in binding activity and cellular sensitivity cannot be due to receptor relocalization. The chimeric receptors were able to 'cap' rapidly during treatment with Con A, suggesting that they are mobile in the plane of the cell membrane. This capping was not influenced by pretreatment with chemoattractant.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030729285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030729285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1083/jcb.139.2.365

DO - 10.1083/jcb.139.2.365

M3 - Article

C2 - 9334341

AN - SCOPUS:0030729285

VL - 139

SP - 365

EP - 374

JO - Journal of Cell Biology

JF - Journal of Cell Biology

SN - 0021-9525

IS - 2

ER -