Drug Use Disorder (DUD) Questionnaire: Scale Development and Validation

Michael Scherer, C. Debra Furr-Holden, Robert B. Voas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Despite the ample interest in the measurement of substance abuse and dependence, obtaining biological samples from participants as a means to validate a scale is considered time and cost intensive and is, subsequently, largely overlooked. Objectives: To report the psychometric properties of the drug use disorder (DUD) questionnaire including oral fluid and blood sample screening indicators measuring the three most commonly used illicit substances-marijuana, cocaine, and extramedicinal painkillers. Subjects: Participants were a subset (N = 2,702) of the 2007 U.S. National Roadside Survey that was administered to daytime and nighttime weekend drivers in the 48 contiguous states to examine the prevalence of substance use and misuse. Measures: Participants completed demographic and substance use questions as well as the DUD-a 12-item measure assessing substance abuse and dependence. Participants could potentially have completed the DUD three times for each of the three substances. Subscales of abuse and dependence were created using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition Text Revision [DSM-IV-TR]) criteria of these diagnoses. Results: The DUD displayed adequate internal consistency on both subscales of substance abuse and dependence (Cronbach's a ranging from .71 to .84 and .83 to .92, respectively). The DUD also demonstrated construct validity in comparison to biological markers of each substance. Conclusions: The DUD is a biologically validated instrument that is both easy to utilize and may have valuable implications as a research tool among both clinical and nonclinical populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-58
Number of pages24
JournalEvaluation Review
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

drug use
questionnaire
substance abuse
weekend
mental disorder
construct validity
psychometrics
Questionnaire
Drugs
Scale Development
diagnostic
abuse
driver
costs
Substance Abuse
Substance Use

Keywords

  • Measurement
  • methodology
  • survey methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Drug Use Disorder (DUD) Questionnaire : Scale Development and Validation. / Scherer, Michael; Furr-Holden, C. Debra; Voas, Robert B.

In: Evaluation Review, Vol. 37, No. 1, 02.2013, p. 35-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scherer, Michael ; Furr-Holden, C. Debra ; Voas, Robert B. / Drug Use Disorder (DUD) Questionnaire : Scale Development and Validation. In: Evaluation Review. 2013 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 35-58.
@article{aef92b0ec4174099be46dea80bd48e19,
title = "Drug Use Disorder (DUD) Questionnaire: Scale Development and Validation",
abstract = "Background: Despite the ample interest in the measurement of substance abuse and dependence, obtaining biological samples from participants as a means to validate a scale is considered time and cost intensive and is, subsequently, largely overlooked. Objectives: To report the psychometric properties of the drug use disorder (DUD) questionnaire including oral fluid and blood sample screening indicators measuring the three most commonly used illicit substances-marijuana, cocaine, and extramedicinal painkillers. Subjects: Participants were a subset (N = 2,702) of the 2007 U.S. National Roadside Survey that was administered to daytime and nighttime weekend drivers in the 48 contiguous states to examine the prevalence of substance use and misuse. Measures: Participants completed demographic and substance use questions as well as the DUD-a 12-item measure assessing substance abuse and dependence. Participants could potentially have completed the DUD three times for each of the three substances. Subscales of abuse and dependence were created using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition Text Revision [DSM-IV-TR]) criteria of these diagnoses. Results: The DUD displayed adequate internal consistency on both subscales of substance abuse and dependence (Cronbach's a ranging from .71 to .84 and .83 to .92, respectively). The DUD also demonstrated construct validity in comparison to biological markers of each substance. Conclusions: The DUD is a biologically validated instrument that is both easy to utilize and may have valuable implications as a research tool among both clinical and nonclinical populations.",
keywords = "Measurement, methodology, survey methodology",
author = "Michael Scherer and Furr-Holden, {C. Debra} and Voas, {Robert B.}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/0193841X13488118",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "35--58",
journal = "Evaluation Review",
issn = "0193-841X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drug Use Disorder (DUD) Questionnaire

T2 - Scale Development and Validation

AU - Scherer, Michael

AU - Furr-Holden, C. Debra

AU - Voas, Robert B.

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Background: Despite the ample interest in the measurement of substance abuse and dependence, obtaining biological samples from participants as a means to validate a scale is considered time and cost intensive and is, subsequently, largely overlooked. Objectives: To report the psychometric properties of the drug use disorder (DUD) questionnaire including oral fluid and blood sample screening indicators measuring the three most commonly used illicit substances-marijuana, cocaine, and extramedicinal painkillers. Subjects: Participants were a subset (N = 2,702) of the 2007 U.S. National Roadside Survey that was administered to daytime and nighttime weekend drivers in the 48 contiguous states to examine the prevalence of substance use and misuse. Measures: Participants completed demographic and substance use questions as well as the DUD-a 12-item measure assessing substance abuse and dependence. Participants could potentially have completed the DUD three times for each of the three substances. Subscales of abuse and dependence were created using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition Text Revision [DSM-IV-TR]) criteria of these diagnoses. Results: The DUD displayed adequate internal consistency on both subscales of substance abuse and dependence (Cronbach's a ranging from .71 to .84 and .83 to .92, respectively). The DUD also demonstrated construct validity in comparison to biological markers of each substance. Conclusions: The DUD is a biologically validated instrument that is both easy to utilize and may have valuable implications as a research tool among both clinical and nonclinical populations.

AB - Background: Despite the ample interest in the measurement of substance abuse and dependence, obtaining biological samples from participants as a means to validate a scale is considered time and cost intensive and is, subsequently, largely overlooked. Objectives: To report the psychometric properties of the drug use disorder (DUD) questionnaire including oral fluid and blood sample screening indicators measuring the three most commonly used illicit substances-marijuana, cocaine, and extramedicinal painkillers. Subjects: Participants were a subset (N = 2,702) of the 2007 U.S. National Roadside Survey that was administered to daytime and nighttime weekend drivers in the 48 contiguous states to examine the prevalence of substance use and misuse. Measures: Participants completed demographic and substance use questions as well as the DUD-a 12-item measure assessing substance abuse and dependence. Participants could potentially have completed the DUD three times for each of the three substances. Subscales of abuse and dependence were created using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition Text Revision [DSM-IV-TR]) criteria of these diagnoses. Results: The DUD displayed adequate internal consistency on both subscales of substance abuse and dependence (Cronbach's a ranging from .71 to .84 and .83 to .92, respectively). The DUD also demonstrated construct validity in comparison to biological markers of each substance. Conclusions: The DUD is a biologically validated instrument that is both easy to utilize and may have valuable implications as a research tool among both clinical and nonclinical populations.

KW - Measurement

KW - methodology

KW - survey methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878917743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878917743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0193841X13488118

DO - 10.1177/0193841X13488118

M3 - Article

C2 - 23711632

AN - SCOPUS:84878917743

VL - 37

SP - 35

EP - 58

JO - Evaluation Review

JF - Evaluation Review

SN - 0193-841X

IS - 1

ER -