Drug tasting may confound human drug discrimination studies

Mary E. Abreu, Roland R Griffiths

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Unpublished observations suggested that some subjects in human drug discrimination studies acquired a drug versus placebo discrimination by tasting the capsule contents. To evaluate the prevalence of this behavior and to develop approaches to circumvent this problem, 30 normal human subjects participated in a drug discrimination study in which the study capsules (i.e., lactose and lactose + quinine) could be discriminated by tasting the capsule contents but were otherwise pharmacologically indistinguishable. Twenty percent of the subjects significantly discriminated between the capsules; this discrimination was disrupted by employing thorough mouth checks following capsule administration. Based on these findings, we recommend that human drug discrimination studies incorporate procedures that minimize the possibility of drug tasting by requiring consumption of sufficient fluid in combination with rigorous mouth checks to ensure capsule swallowing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-257
Number of pages3
JournalPsychopharmacology
Volume125
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Capsules
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Lactose
Mouth
Quinine
Deglutition
Placebos

Keywords

  • cheating
  • compliance
  • confound
  • drug discrimination
  • humans
  • quinine
  • tasting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Drug tasting may confound human drug discrimination studies. / Abreu, Mary E.; Griffiths, Roland R.

In: Psychopharmacology, Vol. 125, No. 3, 1996, p. 255-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fa08c27e44d74dc4a5b46370f70b46df,
title = "Drug tasting may confound human drug discrimination studies",
abstract = "Unpublished observations suggested that some subjects in human drug discrimination studies acquired a drug versus placebo discrimination by tasting the capsule contents. To evaluate the prevalence of this behavior and to develop approaches to circumvent this problem, 30 normal human subjects participated in a drug discrimination study in which the study capsules (i.e., lactose and lactose + quinine) could be discriminated by tasting the capsule contents but were otherwise pharmacologically indistinguishable. Twenty percent of the subjects significantly discriminated between the capsules; this discrimination was disrupted by employing thorough mouth checks following capsule administration. Based on these findings, we recommend that human drug discrimination studies incorporate procedures that minimize the possibility of drug tasting by requiring consumption of sufficient fluid in combination with rigorous mouth checks to ensure capsule swallowing.",
keywords = "cheating, compliance, confound, drug discrimination, humans, quinine, tasting",
author = "Abreu, {Mary E.} and Griffiths, {Roland R}",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1007/BF02247336",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "255--257",
journal = "Psychopharmacology",
issn = "0033-3158",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drug tasting may confound human drug discrimination studies

AU - Abreu, Mary E.

AU - Griffiths, Roland R

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Unpublished observations suggested that some subjects in human drug discrimination studies acquired a drug versus placebo discrimination by tasting the capsule contents. To evaluate the prevalence of this behavior and to develop approaches to circumvent this problem, 30 normal human subjects participated in a drug discrimination study in which the study capsules (i.e., lactose and lactose + quinine) could be discriminated by tasting the capsule contents but were otherwise pharmacologically indistinguishable. Twenty percent of the subjects significantly discriminated between the capsules; this discrimination was disrupted by employing thorough mouth checks following capsule administration. Based on these findings, we recommend that human drug discrimination studies incorporate procedures that minimize the possibility of drug tasting by requiring consumption of sufficient fluid in combination with rigorous mouth checks to ensure capsule swallowing.

AB - Unpublished observations suggested that some subjects in human drug discrimination studies acquired a drug versus placebo discrimination by tasting the capsule contents. To evaluate the prevalence of this behavior and to develop approaches to circumvent this problem, 30 normal human subjects participated in a drug discrimination study in which the study capsules (i.e., lactose and lactose + quinine) could be discriminated by tasting the capsule contents but were otherwise pharmacologically indistinguishable. Twenty percent of the subjects significantly discriminated between the capsules; this discrimination was disrupted by employing thorough mouth checks following capsule administration. Based on these findings, we recommend that human drug discrimination studies incorporate procedures that minimize the possibility of drug tasting by requiring consumption of sufficient fluid in combination with rigorous mouth checks to ensure capsule swallowing.

KW - cheating

KW - compliance

KW - confound

KW - drug discrimination

KW - humans

KW - quinine

KW - tasting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029886233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029886233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02247336

DO - 10.1007/BF02247336

M3 - Article

C2 - 8815961

AN - SCOPUS:0029886233

VL - 125

SP - 255

EP - 257

JO - Psychopharmacology

JF - Psychopharmacology

SN - 0033-3158

IS - 3

ER -