TY - JOUR
T1 - Donor-Recipient Relationship and Risk of ESKD in Live Kidney Donors of Varied Racial Groups
AU - Muzaale, Abimereki D.
AU - Massie, Allan B.
AU - Al Ammary, Fawaz
AU - Henderson, Macey L.
AU - Purnell, Tanjala S.
AU - Holscher, Courtenay M.
AU - Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline
AU - Locke, Jayme E.
AU - Snyder, Jon J.
AU - Lentine, Krista L.
AU - Segev, Dorry L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Rationale & Objective: Risk factors for kidney failure are the basis of live kidney donor candidate evaluation. We quantified risk for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) by the biological relationship of the donor to the recipient, a risk factor that is not addressed by current clinical practice guidelines. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting & Participants: A cohort of 143,750 US kidney donors between 1987 and 2017. Exposure: Biological relationship of donor and recipient. Outcome: ESKD. Donors’ records were linked to national dialysis and transplantation registries to ascertain development of the outcome. Analytic Approach: Donors were observed over a median of 12 (interquartile range, 6-18; maximum, 30) years. Survival analysis methods that account for the competing risk for death were used. Results: Risk for ESKD varied by orders of magnitude across donor-recipient relationship categories. For Asian donors, risks compared with unrelated donors were 259.4-fold greater for identical twins (95% CI, 19.5-3445.6), 4.7-fold greater for full siblings (95% CI, 0.5-41.0), 3.5-fold greater for offspring (95% CI, 0.6-39.5), 1.0 for parents, and 1.0 for half-sibling or other biological relatives. For black donors, risks were 22.5-fold greater for identical twin donors (95% CI, 4.7-107.0), 4.1-fold for full siblings (95% CI, 2.1-7.8), 2.7-fold for offspring (95% CI, 1.4-5.4), 3.1-fold for parents (95% CI, 1.4-6.8), and 1.3-fold for half-sibling or other biological relatives (95% CI, 0.5-3.3). For white donors, risks were 3.5-fold greater for identical twin donors (95% CI, 0.5-25.3), 2.0-fold for full siblings (95% CI, 1.4-2.8), 1.4-fold for offspring (95% CI, 0.9-2.3), 2.9-fold for parents (95% CI, 2.0-4.1), and 0.8-fold for half-sibling or other biological relatives (95% CI, 0.3-1.6). Limitations: Insufficient sample size in some race and relationship groups. Absence of data for family history of kidney disease for donors biologically unrelated to their recipients. Conclusions: Marked differences in risk for ESKD across types of donor-recipient relationship were observed for Asian, black, and white donors. These findings warrant further validation with more robust data to better inform clinical practice guidelines.
AB - Rationale & Objective: Risk factors for kidney failure are the basis of live kidney donor candidate evaluation. We quantified risk for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) by the biological relationship of the donor to the recipient, a risk factor that is not addressed by current clinical practice guidelines. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting & Participants: A cohort of 143,750 US kidney donors between 1987 and 2017. Exposure: Biological relationship of donor and recipient. Outcome: ESKD. Donors’ records were linked to national dialysis and transplantation registries to ascertain development of the outcome. Analytic Approach: Donors were observed over a median of 12 (interquartile range, 6-18; maximum, 30) years. Survival analysis methods that account for the competing risk for death were used. Results: Risk for ESKD varied by orders of magnitude across donor-recipient relationship categories. For Asian donors, risks compared with unrelated donors were 259.4-fold greater for identical twins (95% CI, 19.5-3445.6), 4.7-fold greater for full siblings (95% CI, 0.5-41.0), 3.5-fold greater for offspring (95% CI, 0.6-39.5), 1.0 for parents, and 1.0 for half-sibling or other biological relatives. For black donors, risks were 22.5-fold greater for identical twin donors (95% CI, 4.7-107.0), 4.1-fold for full siblings (95% CI, 2.1-7.8), 2.7-fold for offspring (95% CI, 1.4-5.4), 3.1-fold for parents (95% CI, 1.4-6.8), and 1.3-fold for half-sibling or other biological relatives (95% CI, 0.5-3.3). For white donors, risks were 3.5-fold greater for identical twin donors (95% CI, 0.5-25.3), 2.0-fold for full siblings (95% CI, 1.4-2.8), 1.4-fold for offspring (95% CI, 0.9-2.3), 2.9-fold for parents (95% CI, 2.0-4.1), and 0.8-fold for half-sibling or other biological relatives (95% CI, 0.3-1.6). Limitations: Insufficient sample size in some race and relationship groups. Absence of data for family history of kidney disease for donors biologically unrelated to their recipients. Conclusions: Marked differences in risk for ESKD across types of donor-recipient relationship were observed for Asian, black, and white donors. These findings warrant further validation with more robust data to better inform clinical practice guidelines.
KW - Kidney donation
KW - ancestry
KW - biological relationship
KW - donor-recipient relationship
KW - end-stage renal disease (ESRD)
KW - family history of disease
KW - health risks
KW - kidney failure
KW - living-related donor
KW - offspring
KW - parent
KW - race/ethnicity
KW - renal transplantation
KW - risk of ESRD
KW - sibling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075457291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075457291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.08.020
DO - 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.08.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 31732232
AN - SCOPUS:85075457291
SN - 0272-6386
VL - 75
SP - 333
EP - 341
JO - American Journal of Kidney Diseases
JF - American Journal of Kidney Diseases
IS - 3
ER -