Does therapeutic electrical stimulation improve function in children with disabilities? A comprehensive literature review

Glendaliz Bosques, Rebecca Martin, Leah McGee, Cristina Sadowsky

Research output: Research - peer-reviewReview article

Abstract

The use of therapeutic electrical stimulation for medical purposes is not new; it has been described in medical textbooks since the 18th century, but its use has been limited due to concerns for tolerance and lack of research showing efficacy. The purpose of this review is to discuss the potential clinical applicability, while clarifying the differences in electrical stimulation (ES) treatments and the theory behind potential benefits to remediate functional impairments in youth. The literature review was performed as follows: A total of 37 articles were reviewed and the evidence for use in pediatric diagnoses is reported. The synthesis of the literature suggests that improvements in various impairments may be possible with the integration of ES. Most studies were completed on children with cerebral palsy (CP). Electrical stimulation may improve muscle mass and strength, spasticity, passive range of motion (PROM), upper extremity function, walking speed, and positioning of the foot and ankle kinematics during walking. Sitting posture and static/dynamic sitting balance may be improved with ES to trunk musculature. Bone mineral density may be positively affected with the use of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) ergometry. ES may also be useful in the management of urinary tract dysfunction and chronic constipation. Among all reviewed studies, reports of direct adverse reactions to electrical stimulation were rare. In conclusion, NMES and FES appear to be safe and well tolerated in children with various disabilities. It is suggested that physiatrists and other healthcare providers better understand the indications and parameters in order to utilize these tools effectively in the pediatric population. MeSH terms: Electrical stimulation; child; review.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages83-99
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 31 2016

Fingerprint

Electric Stimulation Therapy
Disabled Children
Electric Stimulation
Pediatrics
Ergometry
Textbooks
Muscle Strength
Cerebral Palsy
Constipation
Articular Range of Motion
Urinary Tract
Posture
Biomechanical Phenomena
Ankle
Upper Extremity
Health Personnel
Bone Density
Walking
Foot
Research

Keywords

  • cerebral palsy
  • disability
  • paraplegia
  • quadriplegia
  • Spasticity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Does therapeutic electrical stimulation improve function in children with disabilities? A comprehensive literature review. / Bosques, Glendaliz; Martin, Rebecca; McGee, Leah; Sadowsky, Cristina.

In: Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 2, 31.05.2016, p. 83-99.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewReview article

@article{a5ae360d0a5549bea7fcb2979ae3f67d,
title = "Does therapeutic electrical stimulation improve function in children with disabilities? A comprehensive literature review",
abstract = "The use of therapeutic electrical stimulation for medical purposes is not new; it has been described in medical textbooks since the 18th century, but its use has been limited due to concerns for tolerance and lack of research showing efficacy. The purpose of this review is to discuss the potential clinical applicability, while clarifying the differences in electrical stimulation (ES) treatments and the theory behind potential benefits to remediate functional impairments in youth. The literature review was performed as follows: A total of 37 articles were reviewed and the evidence for use in pediatric diagnoses is reported. The synthesis of the literature suggests that improvements in various impairments may be possible with the integration of ES. Most studies were completed on children with cerebral palsy (CP). Electrical stimulation may improve muscle mass and strength, spasticity, passive range of motion (PROM), upper extremity function, walking speed, and positioning of the foot and ankle kinematics during walking. Sitting posture and static/dynamic sitting balance may be improved with ES to trunk musculature. Bone mineral density may be positively affected with the use of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) ergometry. ES may also be useful in the management of urinary tract dysfunction and chronic constipation. Among all reviewed studies, reports of direct adverse reactions to electrical stimulation were rare. In conclusion, NMES and FES appear to be safe and well tolerated in children with various disabilities. It is suggested that physiatrists and other healthcare providers better understand the indications and parameters in order to utilize these tools effectively in the pediatric population. MeSH terms: Electrical stimulation; child; review.",
keywords = "cerebral palsy, disability, paraplegia, quadriplegia, Spasticity",
author = "Glendaliz Bosques and Rebecca Martin and Leah McGee and Cristina Sadowsky",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
doi = "10.3233/PRM-160375",
volume = "9",
pages = "83--99",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1874-5393",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does therapeutic electrical stimulation improve function in children with disabilities? A comprehensive literature review

AU - Bosques,Glendaliz

AU - Martin,Rebecca

AU - McGee,Leah

AU - Sadowsky,Cristina

PY - 2016/5/31

Y1 - 2016/5/31

N2 - The use of therapeutic electrical stimulation for medical purposes is not new; it has been described in medical textbooks since the 18th century, but its use has been limited due to concerns for tolerance and lack of research showing efficacy. The purpose of this review is to discuss the potential clinical applicability, while clarifying the differences in electrical stimulation (ES) treatments and the theory behind potential benefits to remediate functional impairments in youth. The literature review was performed as follows: A total of 37 articles were reviewed and the evidence for use in pediatric diagnoses is reported. The synthesis of the literature suggests that improvements in various impairments may be possible with the integration of ES. Most studies were completed on children with cerebral palsy (CP). Electrical stimulation may improve muscle mass and strength, spasticity, passive range of motion (PROM), upper extremity function, walking speed, and positioning of the foot and ankle kinematics during walking. Sitting posture and static/dynamic sitting balance may be improved with ES to trunk musculature. Bone mineral density may be positively affected with the use of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) ergometry. ES may also be useful in the management of urinary tract dysfunction and chronic constipation. Among all reviewed studies, reports of direct adverse reactions to electrical stimulation were rare. In conclusion, NMES and FES appear to be safe and well tolerated in children with various disabilities. It is suggested that physiatrists and other healthcare providers better understand the indications and parameters in order to utilize these tools effectively in the pediatric population. MeSH terms: Electrical stimulation; child; review.

AB - The use of therapeutic electrical stimulation for medical purposes is not new; it has been described in medical textbooks since the 18th century, but its use has been limited due to concerns for tolerance and lack of research showing efficacy. The purpose of this review is to discuss the potential clinical applicability, while clarifying the differences in electrical stimulation (ES) treatments and the theory behind potential benefits to remediate functional impairments in youth. The literature review was performed as follows: A total of 37 articles were reviewed and the evidence for use in pediatric diagnoses is reported. The synthesis of the literature suggests that improvements in various impairments may be possible with the integration of ES. Most studies were completed on children with cerebral palsy (CP). Electrical stimulation may improve muscle mass and strength, spasticity, passive range of motion (PROM), upper extremity function, walking speed, and positioning of the foot and ankle kinematics during walking. Sitting posture and static/dynamic sitting balance may be improved with ES to trunk musculature. Bone mineral density may be positively affected with the use of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) ergometry. ES may also be useful in the management of urinary tract dysfunction and chronic constipation. Among all reviewed studies, reports of direct adverse reactions to electrical stimulation were rare. In conclusion, NMES and FES appear to be safe and well tolerated in children with various disabilities. It is suggested that physiatrists and other healthcare providers better understand the indications and parameters in order to utilize these tools effectively in the pediatric population. MeSH terms: Electrical stimulation; child; review.

KW - cerebral palsy

KW - disability

KW - paraplegia

KW - quadriplegia

KW - Spasticity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974691300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84974691300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/PRM-160375

DO - 10.3233/PRM-160375

M3 - Review article

VL - 9

SP - 83

EP - 99

JO - Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine

T2 - Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1874-5393

IS - 2

ER -