Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | dyr180 |
Pages (from-to) | 310-326 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | International journal of epidemiology |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2012 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Epidemiology
Access to Document
Other files and links
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
In: International journal of epidemiology, Vol. 41, No. 1, dyr180, 02.2012, p. 310-326.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect?
AU - Morris, Brian J.
AU - Waskett, Jake H.
AU - Gray, Ronald H.
N1 - Funding Information: Without evidence, Frisch et al. argue for reduced penile sensitivity as being responsible for their findings. However, this explanation is questionable since medical MC in Denmark is only partial (CH Anderson, personal communication) and the foreskin is not removed as it is for MC in most other countries such as the USA. Thus, the men who self-reported that they were ‘circumcised’ may still have had residual foreskin tissue and its associated nerve endings. The only exception would have been the 4% who were Muslim and 2% Jewish who had religious circumcisions. In all, 89% of the circumcised men were Lutheran or not religious, i.e. were typical of a traditional Danish population. Moreover, the fact that 85% had their ‘circumcision’ after infancy is consistent with it having been performed for treatment of foreskin pathology such as phimosis (which affects ~10%—not 1%—of boys by their late teens5). Moreover, virtually all credible research,5 including clinical measurements and large randomized controlled trials (RCTs),6,7 that the authors disparage, show no difference in sensation or sensitivity during arousal as a result of MC. Their claim that ‘reduced penile sensitivity [of the circumcised penis is] supported by recent neurophysiological studies’ uses as support a flawed study funded NOCIRC in which a subsequent proper statistical analysis of the data revealed no difference.8 One of the large RCTs, moreover, found that ‘circumcised men reported increased penile sensitivity and enhanced ease of reaching orgasm’.6
PY - 2012/2
Y1 - 2012/2
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858636376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858636376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ije/dyr180
DO - 10.1093/ije/dyr180
M3 - Letter
C2 - 22422464
AN - SCOPUS:84858636376
SN - 0300-5771
VL - 41
SP - 310
EP - 326
JO - International journal of epidemiology
JF - International journal of epidemiology
IS - 1
M1 - dyr180
ER -