Does relative value unitYbased compensation shortchange the acute care surgeon?

Diane A. Schwartz, Xuan Hui, Catherine G. Velopulos, Eric B. Schneider, Shalini Selvarajah, Donald Lucas, Elliott R. Haut, Nathaniel McQuay, Timothy M. Pawlik, David T. Efron, Adil H. Haider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that relative value units (RVUs) do not appropriately reflect cognitive effort or time spent in patient care, but RVU continues to be used as a standardized system to track productivity. It is unknown how well RVU reflects the effort of acute care surgeons. Our objective was to determine if RVUs adequately reflect increased surgeon effort required to treat emergent versus elective patients receiving similar procedures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis using The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2011 data set was conducted. The control group consisted of patients undergoing elective colectomy, hernia repair, or biliary procedures as identified by Current Procedural Terminology. Comparison was made to emergent cases after being stratified to laparoscopic or open technique. Generalized linear models and logistic regression were used to assess specific outcomes, controlling for demographics and comorbidities of interest. The RVUs, operative time, and length of stay (LOS) were primary variables, with major/minor complications, mortality, and readmissions being evaluated as the relevant outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 442,149 patients in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program underwent one of the operative procedures of interest; 27,636 biliary (91% laparoscopic; 8.5% open), 28,722 colorectal (40.3% laparoscopic, 59.7% open), and 31,090 hernia (26.6% laparoscopic, 73.4% open) operations. Emergent procedures were found to have average RVU values that were identical to their elective case counterparts. Complication rates were higher and LOS were increased in emergent cases. Odds ratios for complications and readmissions in emergent cases were twice those of elective procedures. Mortality was skewed toward emergent cases. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the emergent operative management for various procedures is similarly valued despite increased LOS, more complications, higher mortality risk, and subsequently increased physician attention. Our findings suggest that the RVU system for acute care surgeons may need to be reevaluated to better capture the additionalwork involved in emergent patient care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-94
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume76
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Keywords

  • Acute care surgery
  • Critical care surgery
  • Emergency general surgery
  • Medical billing
  • Relative value unit (RVU)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does relative value unitYbased compensation shortchange the acute care surgeon?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Schwartz, D. A., Hui, X., Velopulos, C. G., Schneider, E. B., Selvarajah, S., Lucas, D., Haut, E. R., McQuay, N., Pawlik, T. M., Efron, D. T., & Haider, A. H. (2014). Does relative value unitYbased compensation shortchange the acute care surgeon? Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 76(1), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab1ae3