Does peer review predict the performance of research projects in health sciences?

L. Erik Clavería, Eliseo Guallar, Jordi Camí, José Conde, Roberto Pastor, José R. Ricoy, Eduardo Rodríguez-Farré, Fernando Ruiz-Palomo, Emilio Muñoz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Peer review is a basic component of the scientific process, but its performance has seldom been evaluated systematically. To determine whether pre-approval characteristics of research projects predicted the performance of projects, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of all 2744 single-centre research projects financed by the Spanish Health Research Fund since 1938 and completed before 1996. Peer review scores of grant applications were significant predictors of performance of funded projects, and the likelihood of production was also higher for projects with a basic research component, longer duration, higher budget or a financed research fellow. Funding agencies should monitor their selection process and assess the performance of funded projects to design future strategies in supporting health sciences research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-23
Number of pages13
JournalScientometrics
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does peer review predict the performance of research projects in health sciences?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this