Does functional ability in the postoperative period differ between remifentanil- and fentanyl-based anesthesia?

Lee A. Fleisher, Susan Hogue, Mike Colopy, Rebecca S. Twersky, David S. Warner, Brenda D. Jamerson, Kenneth J. Tuman, Peter S A Glass, Michael F. Roizen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study Objectives: To compare patients' functional ability in the 24-hour postoperative period following a remifentanil compared to a hypnotic-fentanyl-treated anesthesia regimen using a 24-Hour Functional Ability Questionnaire. Design: Prospective, 1:1 single-blind, randomized, controlled effectiveness study. Setting: Multicenter study including 156 hospitals and ambulatory surgery facilities. Patients: 2438 patients (1496 outpatients and 942 inpatients) 18 years of age or older, scheduled for elective surgeries under general endotracheal anesthesia, with an expected duration of unconsciousness of ≥30 minutes. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous remifentanil (0.5 μg/kg/min for induction and intubation; with the infusion rate decreased to 0.25 μg/kg/min after intubation) or fentanyl (administered according to anesthesiologists' usual practice) as the opioid during surgery. Concomitant hypnotic drugs were propofol and/or isoflurane (with or without nitrous oxide) titrated according to protocol. Transition analgesia with either morphine or fentanyl was given in the remifentanil patients and at the discretion of the anesthesiologists in the fentanyl patients. Measurements: A validated set of measurements of functional ability, rather than more traditional clinical psychological methods, to compare the recovery of patients from remifentanil- and fentanyl-treated anesthetic regimens up to 24 hours after surgery. Main Results: Remifentanil was statistically superior to fentanyl for the four functional assessments evaluated: walking without dizziness, thinking clearly, concentration, and communicating effectively. These differences reflect events occurring within the first 24 hours after anesthesia and surgery. Conclusions: A remifentanil-treated anesthetic demonstrated earlier return to some functions than a fentanyl-treated technique. Although functional assessment is a field that is still in its infancy, a questionnaire to assess functional ability during the 24 hours after anesthesia may provide more practical information about anesthetic recovery than previously used, traditional psychomotor evaluations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)401-406
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Fentanyl
Postoperative Period
Anesthesia
Anesthetics
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Intubation
Endotracheal Anesthesia
Unconsciousness
Isoflurane
Nitrous Oxide
Dizziness
Propofol
remifentanil
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Analgesia
General Anesthesia
Morphine
Opioid Analgesics
Multicenter Studies
Walking

Keywords

  • Functional status
  • Outcomes
  • Outpatients
  • Recovery
  • Remifentanil

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Fleisher, L. A., Hogue, S., Colopy, M., Twersky, R. S., Warner, D. S., Jamerson, B. D., ... Roizen, M. F. (2001). Does functional ability in the postoperative period differ between remifentanil- and fentanyl-based anesthesia? Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 13(6), 401-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8180(01)00291-4

Does functional ability in the postoperative period differ between remifentanil- and fentanyl-based anesthesia? / Fleisher, Lee A.; Hogue, Susan; Colopy, Mike; Twersky, Rebecca S.; Warner, David S.; Jamerson, Brenda D.; Tuman, Kenneth J.; Glass, Peter S A; Roizen, Michael F.

In: Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Vol. 13, No. 6, 2001, p. 401-406.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fleisher, LA, Hogue, S, Colopy, M, Twersky, RS, Warner, DS, Jamerson, BD, Tuman, KJ, Glass, PSA & Roizen, MF 2001, 'Does functional ability in the postoperative period differ between remifentanil- and fentanyl-based anesthesia?', Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 401-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8180(01)00291-4
Fleisher, Lee A. ; Hogue, Susan ; Colopy, Mike ; Twersky, Rebecca S. ; Warner, David S. ; Jamerson, Brenda D. ; Tuman, Kenneth J. ; Glass, Peter S A ; Roizen, Michael F. / Does functional ability in the postoperative period differ between remifentanil- and fentanyl-based anesthesia?. In: Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2001 ; Vol. 13, No. 6. pp. 401-406.
@article{96c43efe26954298b092ae1a1fed219f,
title = "Does functional ability in the postoperative period differ between remifentanil- and fentanyl-based anesthesia?",
abstract = "Study Objectives: To compare patients' functional ability in the 24-hour postoperative period following a remifentanil compared to a hypnotic-fentanyl-treated anesthesia regimen using a 24-Hour Functional Ability Questionnaire. Design: Prospective, 1:1 single-blind, randomized, controlled effectiveness study. Setting: Multicenter study including 156 hospitals and ambulatory surgery facilities. Patients: 2438 patients (1496 outpatients and 942 inpatients) 18 years of age or older, scheduled for elective surgeries under general endotracheal anesthesia, with an expected duration of unconsciousness of ≥30 minutes. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous remifentanil (0.5 μg/kg/min for induction and intubation; with the infusion rate decreased to 0.25 μg/kg/min after intubation) or fentanyl (administered according to anesthesiologists' usual practice) as the opioid during surgery. Concomitant hypnotic drugs were propofol and/or isoflurane (with or without nitrous oxide) titrated according to protocol. Transition analgesia with either morphine or fentanyl was given in the remifentanil patients and at the discretion of the anesthesiologists in the fentanyl patients. Measurements: A validated set of measurements of functional ability, rather than more traditional clinical psychological methods, to compare the recovery of patients from remifentanil- and fentanyl-treated anesthetic regimens up to 24 hours after surgery. Main Results: Remifentanil was statistically superior to fentanyl for the four functional assessments evaluated: walking without dizziness, thinking clearly, concentration, and communicating effectively. These differences reflect events occurring within the first 24 hours after anesthesia and surgery. Conclusions: A remifentanil-treated anesthetic demonstrated earlier return to some functions than a fentanyl-treated technique. Although functional assessment is a field that is still in its infancy, a questionnaire to assess functional ability during the 24 hours after anesthesia may provide more practical information about anesthetic recovery than previously used, traditional psychomotor evaluations.",
keywords = "Functional status, Outcomes, Outpatients, Recovery, Remifentanil",
author = "Fleisher, {Lee A.} and Susan Hogue and Mike Colopy and Twersky, {Rebecca S.} and Warner, {David S.} and Jamerson, {Brenda D.} and Tuman, {Kenneth J.} and Glass, {Peter S A} and Roizen, {Michael F.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0952-8180(01)00291-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "401--406",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Anesthesia",
issn = "0952-8180",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does functional ability in the postoperative period differ between remifentanil- and fentanyl-based anesthesia?

AU - Fleisher, Lee A.

AU - Hogue, Susan

AU - Colopy, Mike

AU - Twersky, Rebecca S.

AU - Warner, David S.

AU - Jamerson, Brenda D.

AU - Tuman, Kenneth J.

AU - Glass, Peter S A

AU - Roizen, Michael F.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Study Objectives: To compare patients' functional ability in the 24-hour postoperative period following a remifentanil compared to a hypnotic-fentanyl-treated anesthesia regimen using a 24-Hour Functional Ability Questionnaire. Design: Prospective, 1:1 single-blind, randomized, controlled effectiveness study. Setting: Multicenter study including 156 hospitals and ambulatory surgery facilities. Patients: 2438 patients (1496 outpatients and 942 inpatients) 18 years of age or older, scheduled for elective surgeries under general endotracheal anesthesia, with an expected duration of unconsciousness of ≥30 minutes. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous remifentanil (0.5 μg/kg/min for induction and intubation; with the infusion rate decreased to 0.25 μg/kg/min after intubation) or fentanyl (administered according to anesthesiologists' usual practice) as the opioid during surgery. Concomitant hypnotic drugs were propofol and/or isoflurane (with or without nitrous oxide) titrated according to protocol. Transition analgesia with either morphine or fentanyl was given in the remifentanil patients and at the discretion of the anesthesiologists in the fentanyl patients. Measurements: A validated set of measurements of functional ability, rather than more traditional clinical psychological methods, to compare the recovery of patients from remifentanil- and fentanyl-treated anesthetic regimens up to 24 hours after surgery. Main Results: Remifentanil was statistically superior to fentanyl for the four functional assessments evaluated: walking without dizziness, thinking clearly, concentration, and communicating effectively. These differences reflect events occurring within the first 24 hours after anesthesia and surgery. Conclusions: A remifentanil-treated anesthetic demonstrated earlier return to some functions than a fentanyl-treated technique. Although functional assessment is a field that is still in its infancy, a questionnaire to assess functional ability during the 24 hours after anesthesia may provide more practical information about anesthetic recovery than previously used, traditional psychomotor evaluations.

AB - Study Objectives: To compare patients' functional ability in the 24-hour postoperative period following a remifentanil compared to a hypnotic-fentanyl-treated anesthesia regimen using a 24-Hour Functional Ability Questionnaire. Design: Prospective, 1:1 single-blind, randomized, controlled effectiveness study. Setting: Multicenter study including 156 hospitals and ambulatory surgery facilities. Patients: 2438 patients (1496 outpatients and 942 inpatients) 18 years of age or older, scheduled for elective surgeries under general endotracheal anesthesia, with an expected duration of unconsciousness of ≥30 minutes. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous remifentanil (0.5 μg/kg/min for induction and intubation; with the infusion rate decreased to 0.25 μg/kg/min after intubation) or fentanyl (administered according to anesthesiologists' usual practice) as the opioid during surgery. Concomitant hypnotic drugs were propofol and/or isoflurane (with or without nitrous oxide) titrated according to protocol. Transition analgesia with either morphine or fentanyl was given in the remifentanil patients and at the discretion of the anesthesiologists in the fentanyl patients. Measurements: A validated set of measurements of functional ability, rather than more traditional clinical psychological methods, to compare the recovery of patients from remifentanil- and fentanyl-treated anesthetic regimens up to 24 hours after surgery. Main Results: Remifentanil was statistically superior to fentanyl for the four functional assessments evaluated: walking without dizziness, thinking clearly, concentration, and communicating effectively. These differences reflect events occurring within the first 24 hours after anesthesia and surgery. Conclusions: A remifentanil-treated anesthetic demonstrated earlier return to some functions than a fentanyl-treated technique. Although functional assessment is a field that is still in its infancy, a questionnaire to assess functional ability during the 24 hours after anesthesia may provide more practical information about anesthetic recovery than previously used, traditional psychomotor evaluations.

KW - Functional status

KW - Outcomes

KW - Outpatients

KW - Recovery

KW - Remifentanil

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034809320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034809320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0952-8180(01)00291-4

DO - 10.1016/S0952-8180(01)00291-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 11578882

AN - SCOPUS:0034809320

VL - 13

SP - 401

EP - 406

JO - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

SN - 0952-8180

IS - 6

ER -