Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis.

Thorsten M. Seyler, Lawrence P. Lai, Denise I. Sprinkle, William G. Ward, Riyaz H. Jinnah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hip resurfacing is a technically demanding procedure in which accurate positioning of the femoral component is critical to the avoidance of early implant failures. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted placement of the femoral component and to evaluate the impact of computer-assisted surgery on the learning curve associated with this procedure. METHODS: The accuracy of positioning the femoral component was analyzed radiographically in hips undergoing resurfacing procedures performed by surgeons assigned to four different study groups: Group 1, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by a fellowship-trained surgeon who was experienced in performing resurfacing arthroplasty (surgical experience, more than 250 hip resurfacings); Group 2, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by senior residents who were inexperienced in performing resurfacing arthroplasty and who were closely supervised by faculty; Group 3, in which the operations were performed with use of conventional instruments by fellowship-trained faculty members; and Group 4, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by a lesser experienced fellowship-trained faculty member (surgical experience, more than forty but less than seventy-five hip resurfacings) from Group 3. RESULTS: The range of error in varus or valgus angulation that was observed for navigated procedures was 6 degrees in Group 1, 7 degrees in Group 2, and 5 degrees in Group 4. Compared with the preoperative neck-shaft angle value, the mean postoperative stem-shaft angle value increased by a mean of 4.7 degrees in Group 1, 7.2 degrees in Group 2, 6.5 degrees in Group 3, and 11.6 degrees in Group 4. When compared with the use of standard instrumentation, the use of computer-assisted surgery reduced the number of outliers and facilitated valgus insertion. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, computer-assisted surgery resulted in improved accuracy and precision in positioning the femoral component. In addition, computer-assisted surgery led to a reduction in the length of the learning curve for beginners in hip resurfacing and improved the surgeon's ability to perform this procedure safely.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)71-80
Number of pages10
JournalThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
Volume90 Suppl 3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Computer-Assisted Surgery
Learning Curve
Hip
Thigh
Arthroplasty
Aptitude
Neck

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis. / Seyler, Thorsten M.; Lai, Lawrence P.; Sprinkle, Denise I.; Ward, William G.; Jinnah, Riyaz H.

In: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, Vol. 90 Suppl 3, 08.2008, p. 71-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seyler, Thorsten M. ; Lai, Lawrence P. ; Sprinkle, Denise I. ; Ward, William G. ; Jinnah, Riyaz H. / Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis. In: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 2008 ; Vol. 90 Suppl 3. pp. 71-80.
@article{b344244375c849b2bf8cb9499bac377f,
title = "Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Hip resurfacing is a technically demanding procedure in which accurate positioning of the femoral component is critical to the avoidance of early implant failures. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted placement of the femoral component and to evaluate the impact of computer-assisted surgery on the learning curve associated with this procedure. METHODS: The accuracy of positioning the femoral component was analyzed radiographically in hips undergoing resurfacing procedures performed by surgeons assigned to four different study groups: Group 1, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by a fellowship-trained surgeon who was experienced in performing resurfacing arthroplasty (surgical experience, more than 250 hip resurfacings); Group 2, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by senior residents who were inexperienced in performing resurfacing arthroplasty and who were closely supervised by faculty; Group 3, in which the operations were performed with use of conventional instruments by fellowship-trained faculty members; and Group 4, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by a lesser experienced fellowship-trained faculty member (surgical experience, more than forty but less than seventy-five hip resurfacings) from Group 3. RESULTS: The range of error in varus or valgus angulation that was observed for navigated procedures was 6 degrees in Group 1, 7 degrees in Group 2, and 5 degrees in Group 4. Compared with the preoperative neck-shaft angle value, the mean postoperative stem-shaft angle value increased by a mean of 4.7 degrees in Group 1, 7.2 degrees in Group 2, 6.5 degrees in Group 3, and 11.6 degrees in Group 4. When compared with the use of standard instrumentation, the use of computer-assisted surgery reduced the number of outliers and facilitated valgus insertion. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, computer-assisted surgery resulted in improved accuracy and precision in positioning the femoral component. In addition, computer-assisted surgery led to a reduction in the length of the learning curve for beginners in hip resurfacing and improved the surgeon's ability to perform this procedure safely.",
author = "Seyler, {Thorsten M.} and Lai, {Lawrence P.} and Sprinkle, {Denise I.} and Ward, {William G.} and Jinnah, {Riyaz H.}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
doi = "10.2106/JBJS.H.00697",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90 Suppl 3",
pages = "71--80",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis.

AU - Seyler, Thorsten M.

AU - Lai, Lawrence P.

AU - Sprinkle, Denise I.

AU - Ward, William G.

AU - Jinnah, Riyaz H.

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - BACKGROUND: Hip resurfacing is a technically demanding procedure in which accurate positioning of the femoral component is critical to the avoidance of early implant failures. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted placement of the femoral component and to evaluate the impact of computer-assisted surgery on the learning curve associated with this procedure. METHODS: The accuracy of positioning the femoral component was analyzed radiographically in hips undergoing resurfacing procedures performed by surgeons assigned to four different study groups: Group 1, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by a fellowship-trained surgeon who was experienced in performing resurfacing arthroplasty (surgical experience, more than 250 hip resurfacings); Group 2, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by senior residents who were inexperienced in performing resurfacing arthroplasty and who were closely supervised by faculty; Group 3, in which the operations were performed with use of conventional instruments by fellowship-trained faculty members; and Group 4, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by a lesser experienced fellowship-trained faculty member (surgical experience, more than forty but less than seventy-five hip resurfacings) from Group 3. RESULTS: The range of error in varus or valgus angulation that was observed for navigated procedures was 6 degrees in Group 1, 7 degrees in Group 2, and 5 degrees in Group 4. Compared with the preoperative neck-shaft angle value, the mean postoperative stem-shaft angle value increased by a mean of 4.7 degrees in Group 1, 7.2 degrees in Group 2, 6.5 degrees in Group 3, and 11.6 degrees in Group 4. When compared with the use of standard instrumentation, the use of computer-assisted surgery reduced the number of outliers and facilitated valgus insertion. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, computer-assisted surgery resulted in improved accuracy and precision in positioning the femoral component. In addition, computer-assisted surgery led to a reduction in the length of the learning curve for beginners in hip resurfacing and improved the surgeon's ability to perform this procedure safely.

AB - BACKGROUND: Hip resurfacing is a technically demanding procedure in which accurate positioning of the femoral component is critical to the avoidance of early implant failures. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted placement of the femoral component and to evaluate the impact of computer-assisted surgery on the learning curve associated with this procedure. METHODS: The accuracy of positioning the femoral component was analyzed radiographically in hips undergoing resurfacing procedures performed by surgeons assigned to four different study groups: Group 1, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by a fellowship-trained surgeon who was experienced in performing resurfacing arthroplasty (surgical experience, more than 250 hip resurfacings); Group 2, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by senior residents who were inexperienced in performing resurfacing arthroplasty and who were closely supervised by faculty; Group 3, in which the operations were performed with use of conventional instruments by fellowship-trained faculty members; and Group 4, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by a lesser experienced fellowship-trained faculty member (surgical experience, more than forty but less than seventy-five hip resurfacings) from Group 3. RESULTS: The range of error in varus or valgus angulation that was observed for navigated procedures was 6 degrees in Group 1, 7 degrees in Group 2, and 5 degrees in Group 4. Compared with the preoperative neck-shaft angle value, the mean postoperative stem-shaft angle value increased by a mean of 4.7 degrees in Group 1, 7.2 degrees in Group 2, 6.5 degrees in Group 3, and 11.6 degrees in Group 4. When compared with the use of standard instrumentation, the use of computer-assisted surgery reduced the number of outliers and facilitated valgus insertion. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, computer-assisted surgery resulted in improved accuracy and precision in positioning the femoral component. In addition, computer-assisted surgery led to a reduction in the length of the learning curve for beginners in hip resurfacing and improved the surgeon's ability to perform this procedure safely.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49849089116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49849089116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.H.00697

DO - 10.2106/JBJS.H.00697

M3 - Article

C2 - 18676940

AN - SCOPUS:49849089116

VL - 90 Suppl 3

SP - 71

EP - 80

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A

SN - 0021-9355

ER -