Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?

Vahé A. Kazandjian, C. Patrick Chaulk, Sam Ogunbo, Karol Wicker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is evidence that average total charges per episode of child birth depend on maternal plus child length of stay, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) utilization, maternal race and mode of delivery. In particular, when maternal and child records are linked, this study suggests that when adjusted for maternal characteristics, the cost of vaginal deliveries followed by NICU utilization may be higher than the cost of Cesarean sections and NICU utilization. Objective: Cesarean section, one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures on women, is rising globally and in the USA. Much of the current Cesarean section literature focuses on reporting geographic and hospital-specific variations, but little has been published about the clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients, and even less about the economic consequences of a Cesarean section delivery compared with a vaginal delivery [e.g. the total hospital charges and length of neonatal intensive care unit-NICU-stay] of a birth episode. To examine these relationships further, three urban Baltimore hospitals volunteered in 2004 to participate in a retrospective chart review that linked mother and child hospital records. Methods: 1172 mother-child records were randomly selected and data regarding maternal co-morbidities, age, infant weight along with transfer to neonatal intensive care units, and economic data were extracted from the mother and child charts. Conclusion: Average total charges for vaginal deliveries [maternal plus total baby charges that includes NICU utilization (X = $17 624.38)] may be higher than average total charges for Cesarean sections [maternal plus total baby charges that includes NICU utilization (X = $13 805.47)]. Specifically, maternal race - being African American - was indirectly associated with overall charges through its association with mode of delivery and NICU utilization patterns. The presence of maternal co-morbidities - Herpes Simplex Virus, hypertension and diabetes - most probably influenced babies' hospital stay charges as well as NICU charges when transferred to NICU following both vaginal and Cesarean section deliveries. Thus, prenatal care targeting co-morbidities management may reduce the odds of a newborn's transfer to NICU thus avoiding greater lengths of stay, medical care and charges. Recommendations for obstetrical practices as well as health care policy on their charges should not assume that Cesarean section deliveries are always costlier than vaginal deliveries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16-20
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Cesarean Section
Mothers
Costs and Cost Analysis
Hospital Charges
Length of Stay
Morbidity
Economics
Parturition
Baltimore
Prenatal Care
Hospital Records
Urban Hospitals
Simplexvirus
Health Policy
African Americans
Demography
Newborn Infant
Hypertension

Keywords

  • Cesarean section rate
  • Mode of delivery
  • NICU
  • True cost of delivery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Information Management
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery? / Kazandjian, Vahé A.; Chaulk, C. Patrick; Ogunbo, Sam; Wicker, Karol.

In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 13, No. 1, 02.2007, p. 16-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kazandjian, Vahé A. ; Chaulk, C. Patrick ; Ogunbo, Sam ; Wicker, Karol. / Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?. In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2007 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 16-20.
@article{2bf5b6bc501a43be86bb2c1681a4dbd5,
title = "Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?",
abstract = "There is evidence that average total charges per episode of child birth depend on maternal plus child length of stay, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) utilization, maternal race and mode of delivery. In particular, when maternal and child records are linked, this study suggests that when adjusted for maternal characteristics, the cost of vaginal deliveries followed by NICU utilization may be higher than the cost of Cesarean sections and NICU utilization. Objective: Cesarean section, one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures on women, is rising globally and in the USA. Much of the current Cesarean section literature focuses on reporting geographic and hospital-specific variations, but little has been published about the clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients, and even less about the economic consequences of a Cesarean section delivery compared with a vaginal delivery [e.g. the total hospital charges and length of neonatal intensive care unit-NICU-stay] of a birth episode. To examine these relationships further, three urban Baltimore hospitals volunteered in 2004 to participate in a retrospective chart review that linked mother and child hospital records. Methods: 1172 mother-child records were randomly selected and data regarding maternal co-morbidities, age, infant weight along with transfer to neonatal intensive care units, and economic data were extracted from the mother and child charts. Conclusion: Average total charges for vaginal deliveries [maternal plus total baby charges that includes NICU utilization (X = $17 624.38)] may be higher than average total charges for Cesarean sections [maternal plus total baby charges that includes NICU utilization (X = $13 805.47)]. Specifically, maternal race - being African American - was indirectly associated with overall charges through its association with mode of delivery and NICU utilization patterns. The presence of maternal co-morbidities - Herpes Simplex Virus, hypertension and diabetes - most probably influenced babies' hospital stay charges as well as NICU charges when transferred to NICU following both vaginal and Cesarean section deliveries. Thus, prenatal care targeting co-morbidities management may reduce the odds of a newborn's transfer to NICU thus avoiding greater lengths of stay, medical care and charges. Recommendations for obstetrical practices as well as health care policy on their charges should not assume that Cesarean section deliveries are always costlier than vaginal deliveries.",
keywords = "Cesarean section rate, Mode of delivery, NICU, True cost of delivery",
author = "Kazandjian, {Vah{\'e} A.} and Chaulk, {C. Patrick} and Sam Ogunbo and Karol Wicker",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00690.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "16--20",
journal = "Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice",
issn = "1356-1294",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?

AU - Kazandjian, Vahé A.

AU - Chaulk, C. Patrick

AU - Ogunbo, Sam

AU - Wicker, Karol

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - There is evidence that average total charges per episode of child birth depend on maternal plus child length of stay, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) utilization, maternal race and mode of delivery. In particular, when maternal and child records are linked, this study suggests that when adjusted for maternal characteristics, the cost of vaginal deliveries followed by NICU utilization may be higher than the cost of Cesarean sections and NICU utilization. Objective: Cesarean section, one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures on women, is rising globally and in the USA. Much of the current Cesarean section literature focuses on reporting geographic and hospital-specific variations, but little has been published about the clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients, and even less about the economic consequences of a Cesarean section delivery compared with a vaginal delivery [e.g. the total hospital charges and length of neonatal intensive care unit-NICU-stay] of a birth episode. To examine these relationships further, three urban Baltimore hospitals volunteered in 2004 to participate in a retrospective chart review that linked mother and child hospital records. Methods: 1172 mother-child records were randomly selected and data regarding maternal co-morbidities, age, infant weight along with transfer to neonatal intensive care units, and economic data were extracted from the mother and child charts. Conclusion: Average total charges for vaginal deliveries [maternal plus total baby charges that includes NICU utilization (X = $17 624.38)] may be higher than average total charges for Cesarean sections [maternal plus total baby charges that includes NICU utilization (X = $13 805.47)]. Specifically, maternal race - being African American - was indirectly associated with overall charges through its association with mode of delivery and NICU utilization patterns. The presence of maternal co-morbidities - Herpes Simplex Virus, hypertension and diabetes - most probably influenced babies' hospital stay charges as well as NICU charges when transferred to NICU following both vaginal and Cesarean section deliveries. Thus, prenatal care targeting co-morbidities management may reduce the odds of a newborn's transfer to NICU thus avoiding greater lengths of stay, medical care and charges. Recommendations for obstetrical practices as well as health care policy on their charges should not assume that Cesarean section deliveries are always costlier than vaginal deliveries.

AB - There is evidence that average total charges per episode of child birth depend on maternal plus child length of stay, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) utilization, maternal race and mode of delivery. In particular, when maternal and child records are linked, this study suggests that when adjusted for maternal characteristics, the cost of vaginal deliveries followed by NICU utilization may be higher than the cost of Cesarean sections and NICU utilization. Objective: Cesarean section, one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures on women, is rising globally and in the USA. Much of the current Cesarean section literature focuses on reporting geographic and hospital-specific variations, but little has been published about the clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients, and even less about the economic consequences of a Cesarean section delivery compared with a vaginal delivery [e.g. the total hospital charges and length of neonatal intensive care unit-NICU-stay] of a birth episode. To examine these relationships further, three urban Baltimore hospitals volunteered in 2004 to participate in a retrospective chart review that linked mother and child hospital records. Methods: 1172 mother-child records were randomly selected and data regarding maternal co-morbidities, age, infant weight along with transfer to neonatal intensive care units, and economic data were extracted from the mother and child charts. Conclusion: Average total charges for vaginal deliveries [maternal plus total baby charges that includes NICU utilization (X = $17 624.38)] may be higher than average total charges for Cesarean sections [maternal plus total baby charges that includes NICU utilization (X = $13 805.47)]. Specifically, maternal race - being African American - was indirectly associated with overall charges through its association with mode of delivery and NICU utilization patterns. The presence of maternal co-morbidities - Herpes Simplex Virus, hypertension and diabetes - most probably influenced babies' hospital stay charges as well as NICU charges when transferred to NICU following both vaginal and Cesarean section deliveries. Thus, prenatal care targeting co-morbidities management may reduce the odds of a newborn's transfer to NICU thus avoiding greater lengths of stay, medical care and charges. Recommendations for obstetrical practices as well as health care policy on their charges should not assume that Cesarean section deliveries are always costlier than vaginal deliveries.

KW - Cesarean section rate

KW - Mode of delivery

KW - NICU

KW - True cost of delivery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846922814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846922814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00690.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00690.x

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 16

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

SN - 1356-1294

IS - 1

ER -