Documentation of code status and discussion of goals of care in gravely ill hospitalized patients

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Timely discussions about goals of care in critically ill patients have been shown to be important. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review over 2 years (2003-2004) of patients admitted to our medical service who were classified as "expected to die." Charts were evaluated for do-not-resuscitate (DNR) documentation and discussions of goals of care. Detailed chart reviews for demographic information, cause of death, site of death, length of stay, and duration of resuscitation attempt were performed. Results: Of 497 charts identified, 434 (87.3%) had a DNR on file at the time of death. After exclusion of patients who died in less than 24 hours, 18 no-DNR charts remained. Seven noted a decision to continue aggressive care and 11 had no code status discussion documented. Younger patients and patients with cardiovascular disease were less likely to have a DNR. Resuscitation times were longer in the no-discussion group. All patients who died without a DNR died in the intensive care unit. Seventy-six percent of discussions were done by medicine housestaff. Conclusions: Although the overall rate of DNR documentation was high, several trends emerged. Medicine housestaff in the intensive care unit would be a logical group to target for an educational intervention to address these discrepancies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)288-292
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Patient Care Planning
Documentation
Resuscitation
Intensive Care Units
Medicine
Critical Illness
Cause of Death
Length of Stay
Cardiovascular Diseases
Demography

Keywords

  • Code status
  • End of life
  • Goals of care
  • Medical education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Documentation of code status and discussion of goals of care in gravely ill hospitalized patients. / Holley, Abigail; Kravet, Steven J; Cordts, Grace A.

In: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 24, No. 2, 06.2009, p. 288-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5ddc171d038c469092df20eeb5ffe63e,
title = "Documentation of code status and discussion of goals of care in gravely ill hospitalized patients",
abstract = "Background: Timely discussions about goals of care in critically ill patients have been shown to be important. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review over 2 years (2003-2004) of patients admitted to our medical service who were classified as {"}expected to die.{"} Charts were evaluated for do-not-resuscitate (DNR) documentation and discussions of goals of care. Detailed chart reviews for demographic information, cause of death, site of death, length of stay, and duration of resuscitation attempt were performed. Results: Of 497 charts identified, 434 (87.3{\%}) had a DNR on file at the time of death. After exclusion of patients who died in less than 24 hours, 18 no-DNR charts remained. Seven noted a decision to continue aggressive care and 11 had no code status discussion documented. Younger patients and patients with cardiovascular disease were less likely to have a DNR. Resuscitation times were longer in the no-discussion group. All patients who died without a DNR died in the intensive care unit. Seventy-six percent of discussions were done by medicine housestaff. Conclusions: Although the overall rate of DNR documentation was high, several trends emerged. Medicine housestaff in the intensive care unit would be a logical group to target for an educational intervention to address these discrepancies.",
keywords = "Code status, End of life, Goals of care, Medical education",
author = "Abigail Holley and Kravet, {Steven J} and Cordts, {Grace A.}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.03.035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "288--292",
journal = "Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "0883-9441",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Documentation of code status and discussion of goals of care in gravely ill hospitalized patients

AU - Holley, Abigail

AU - Kravet, Steven J

AU - Cordts, Grace A.

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Background: Timely discussions about goals of care in critically ill patients have been shown to be important. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review over 2 years (2003-2004) of patients admitted to our medical service who were classified as "expected to die." Charts were evaluated for do-not-resuscitate (DNR) documentation and discussions of goals of care. Detailed chart reviews for demographic information, cause of death, site of death, length of stay, and duration of resuscitation attempt were performed. Results: Of 497 charts identified, 434 (87.3%) had a DNR on file at the time of death. After exclusion of patients who died in less than 24 hours, 18 no-DNR charts remained. Seven noted a decision to continue aggressive care and 11 had no code status discussion documented. Younger patients and patients with cardiovascular disease were less likely to have a DNR. Resuscitation times were longer in the no-discussion group. All patients who died without a DNR died in the intensive care unit. Seventy-six percent of discussions were done by medicine housestaff. Conclusions: Although the overall rate of DNR documentation was high, several trends emerged. Medicine housestaff in the intensive care unit would be a logical group to target for an educational intervention to address these discrepancies.

AB - Background: Timely discussions about goals of care in critically ill patients have been shown to be important. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review over 2 years (2003-2004) of patients admitted to our medical service who were classified as "expected to die." Charts were evaluated for do-not-resuscitate (DNR) documentation and discussions of goals of care. Detailed chart reviews for demographic information, cause of death, site of death, length of stay, and duration of resuscitation attempt were performed. Results: Of 497 charts identified, 434 (87.3%) had a DNR on file at the time of death. After exclusion of patients who died in less than 24 hours, 18 no-DNR charts remained. Seven noted a decision to continue aggressive care and 11 had no code status discussion documented. Younger patients and patients with cardiovascular disease were less likely to have a DNR. Resuscitation times were longer in the no-discussion group. All patients who died without a DNR died in the intensive care unit. Seventy-six percent of discussions were done by medicine housestaff. Conclusions: Although the overall rate of DNR documentation was high, several trends emerged. Medicine housestaff in the intensive care unit would be a logical group to target for an educational intervention to address these discrepancies.

KW - Code status

KW - End of life

KW - Goals of care

KW - Medical education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349226067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349226067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.03.035

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.03.035

M3 - Article

C2 - 19327289

AN - SCOPUS:67349226067

VL - 24

SP - 288

EP - 292

JO - Journal of Critical Care

JF - Journal of Critical Care

SN - 0883-9441

IS - 2

ER -