Do Words Matter? Stigmatizing Language and the Transmission of Bias in the Medical Record

Anna P. Goddu, Katie J. O’Conor, Sophie Lanzkron, Mustapha Saheed, Somnath Saha, Monica E. Peek, Carlton Haywood, Mary Catherine Beach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Clinician bias contributes to healthcare disparities, and the language used to describe a patient may reflect that bias. Although medical records are an integral method of communicating about patients, no studies have evaluated patient records as a means of transmitting bias from one clinician to another. Objective: To assess whether stigmatizing language written in a patient medical record is associated with a subsequent physician-in-training’s attitudes towards the patient and clinical decision-making. Design: Randomized vignette study of two chart notes employing stigmatizing versus neutral language to describe the same hypothetical patient, a 28-year-old man with sickle cell disease. Participants: A total of 413 physicians-in-training: medical students and residents in internal and emergency medicine programs at an urban academic medical center (54% response rate). Main Measures: Attitudes towards the hypothetical patient using the previously validated Positive Attitudes towards Sickle Cell Patients Scale (range 7–35) and pain management decisions (residents only) using two multiple-choice questions (composite range 2–7 representing intensity of pain treatment). Key Results: Exposure to the stigmatizing language note was associated with more negative attitudes towards the patient (20.6 stigmatizing vs. 25.6 neutral, p < 0.001). Furthermore, reading the stigmatizing language note was associated with less aggressive management of the patient’s pain (5.56 stigmatizing vs. 6.22 neutral, p = 0.003). Conclusions: Stigmatizing language used in medical records to describe patients can influence subsequent physicians-in-training in terms of their attitudes towards the patient and their medication prescribing behavior. This is an important and overlooked pathway by which bias can be propagated from one clinician to another. Attention to the language used in medical records may help to promote patient-centered care and to reduce healthcare disparities for stigmatized populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 26 2018

Fingerprint

Medical Records
Language
Healthcare Disparities
Pain Management
Physicians
Patient-Centered Care
Emergency Medicine
Sickle Cell Anemia
Internal Medicine
Medical Students
Reading
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Do Words Matter? Stigmatizing Language and the Transmission of Bias in the Medical Record. / P. Goddu, Anna; O’Conor, Katie J.; Lanzkron, Sophie; Saheed, Mustapha; Saha, Somnath; Peek, Monica E.; Haywood, Carlton; Beach, Mary Catherine.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26.01.2018, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{235e4cef14834bc183b9b0453d2b4489,
title = "Do Words Matter? Stigmatizing Language and the Transmission of Bias in the Medical Record",
abstract = "Background: Clinician bias contributes to healthcare disparities, and the language used to describe a patient may reflect that bias. Although medical records are an integral method of communicating about patients, no studies have evaluated patient records as a means of transmitting bias from one clinician to another. Objective: To assess whether stigmatizing language written in a patient medical record is associated with a subsequent physician-in-training’s attitudes towards the patient and clinical decision-making. Design: Randomized vignette study of two chart notes employing stigmatizing versus neutral language to describe the same hypothetical patient, a 28-year-old man with sickle cell disease. Participants: A total of 413 physicians-in-training: medical students and residents in internal and emergency medicine programs at an urban academic medical center (54{\%} response rate). Main Measures: Attitudes towards the hypothetical patient using the previously validated Positive Attitudes towards Sickle Cell Patients Scale (range 7–35) and pain management decisions (residents only) using two multiple-choice questions (composite range 2–7 representing intensity of pain treatment). Key Results: Exposure to the stigmatizing language note was associated with more negative attitudes towards the patient (20.6 stigmatizing vs. 25.6 neutral, p < 0.001). Furthermore, reading the stigmatizing language note was associated with less aggressive management of the patient’s pain (5.56 stigmatizing vs. 6.22 neutral, p = 0.003). Conclusions: Stigmatizing language used in medical records to describe patients can influence subsequent physicians-in-training in terms of their attitudes towards the patient and their medication prescribing behavior. This is an important and overlooked pathway by which bias can be propagated from one clinician to another. Attention to the language used in medical records may help to promote patient-centered care and to reduce healthcare disparities for stigmatized populations.",
author = "{P. Goddu}, Anna and O’Conor, {Katie J.} and Sophie Lanzkron and Mustapha Saheed and Somnath Saha and Peek, {Monica E.} and Carlton Haywood and Beach, {Mary Catherine}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-017-4289-2",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Words Matter? Stigmatizing Language and the Transmission of Bias in the Medical Record

AU - P. Goddu, Anna

AU - O’Conor, Katie J.

AU - Lanzkron, Sophie

AU - Saheed, Mustapha

AU - Saha, Somnath

AU - Peek, Monica E.

AU - Haywood, Carlton

AU - Beach, Mary Catherine

PY - 2018/1/26

Y1 - 2018/1/26

N2 - Background: Clinician bias contributes to healthcare disparities, and the language used to describe a patient may reflect that bias. Although medical records are an integral method of communicating about patients, no studies have evaluated patient records as a means of transmitting bias from one clinician to another. Objective: To assess whether stigmatizing language written in a patient medical record is associated with a subsequent physician-in-training’s attitudes towards the patient and clinical decision-making. Design: Randomized vignette study of two chart notes employing stigmatizing versus neutral language to describe the same hypothetical patient, a 28-year-old man with sickle cell disease. Participants: A total of 413 physicians-in-training: medical students and residents in internal and emergency medicine programs at an urban academic medical center (54% response rate). Main Measures: Attitudes towards the hypothetical patient using the previously validated Positive Attitudes towards Sickle Cell Patients Scale (range 7–35) and pain management decisions (residents only) using two multiple-choice questions (composite range 2–7 representing intensity of pain treatment). Key Results: Exposure to the stigmatizing language note was associated with more negative attitudes towards the patient (20.6 stigmatizing vs. 25.6 neutral, p < 0.001). Furthermore, reading the stigmatizing language note was associated with less aggressive management of the patient’s pain (5.56 stigmatizing vs. 6.22 neutral, p = 0.003). Conclusions: Stigmatizing language used in medical records to describe patients can influence subsequent physicians-in-training in terms of their attitudes towards the patient and their medication prescribing behavior. This is an important and overlooked pathway by which bias can be propagated from one clinician to another. Attention to the language used in medical records may help to promote patient-centered care and to reduce healthcare disparities for stigmatized populations.

AB - Background: Clinician bias contributes to healthcare disparities, and the language used to describe a patient may reflect that bias. Although medical records are an integral method of communicating about patients, no studies have evaluated patient records as a means of transmitting bias from one clinician to another. Objective: To assess whether stigmatizing language written in a patient medical record is associated with a subsequent physician-in-training’s attitudes towards the patient and clinical decision-making. Design: Randomized vignette study of two chart notes employing stigmatizing versus neutral language to describe the same hypothetical patient, a 28-year-old man with sickle cell disease. Participants: A total of 413 physicians-in-training: medical students and residents in internal and emergency medicine programs at an urban academic medical center (54% response rate). Main Measures: Attitudes towards the hypothetical patient using the previously validated Positive Attitudes towards Sickle Cell Patients Scale (range 7–35) and pain management decisions (residents only) using two multiple-choice questions (composite range 2–7 representing intensity of pain treatment). Key Results: Exposure to the stigmatizing language note was associated with more negative attitudes towards the patient (20.6 stigmatizing vs. 25.6 neutral, p < 0.001). Furthermore, reading the stigmatizing language note was associated with less aggressive management of the patient’s pain (5.56 stigmatizing vs. 6.22 neutral, p = 0.003). Conclusions: Stigmatizing language used in medical records to describe patients can influence subsequent physicians-in-training in terms of their attitudes towards the patient and their medication prescribing behavior. This is an important and overlooked pathway by which bias can be propagated from one clinician to another. Attention to the language used in medical records may help to promote patient-centered care and to reduce healthcare disparities for stigmatized populations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041003403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041003403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-017-4289-2

DO - 10.1007/s11606-017-4289-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 29374357

AN - SCOPUS:85041003403

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

ER -