Do we over-state the risk of multiple pulsed exposures?

David H. Sliney, David J. Lund

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Laser safety standards committees have struggled for years to adequately formulate a sound method for treating repetitive-pulse laser exposures. Safety standards for lamps and LEDs have ignored this issue because averaged irradiance appeared to adequately treat the issue for large retinal image sizes and skin exposures. Several authors in recent meetings have questioned the current approach of three conditions as still not sufficient to treat pulses of unequal energies or certain pulse groupings. Schulmeister et al (2007) employed thermal modeling to show that the total-on-time pulse rule was conservative. However, Lund (2007) has further developed the approach of probability summation put forth by Menendez et al. (1991), whereby the additivity is really the result of an increasing probability of detecting injury for multiple pulses, and related this to the slope of the probit curve for the threshold study. Since the uncertainty in the minimal, ophthalmoscopically visible retinal lesion (MVL) threshold is great, ACGIH, ANSI and ICNIRP committees traditionally applied large risk reduction factors ("'safety factors") of one order of magnitude when deriving intrabeam, "point-source" exposure limits. This reduction factor took into account the probability of visually detecting the low-contrast lesion, the probability of striking an area of high pigmentation, etc. Thus the N-1/4 reduction factor may just be an artifact of detecting the lesion. The reduction factor exponent is much smaller for large spot sizes where these probabilities are quite reduced. Two recent studies, by D.J. Lund, on repetitive pulse studies in animal models, and by Schulmeister et al., on multiple pulse studies in retinal expiants, support this interpretation of the available data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe World's Leading Conference on Laser Safety, ILSC 2009 - International Laser Safety Conference
PublisherLaser Institute of America
Pages93-98
Number of pages6
ISBN (Print)9780912035246
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
Event2009 International Laser Safety Conference, ILSC 2009 - Reno, NV, United States
Duration: Mar 23 2009Mar 26 2009

Other

Other2009 International Laser Safety Conference, ILSC 2009
CountryUnited States
CityReno, NV
Period3/23/093/26/09

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Do we over-state the risk of multiple pulsed exposures?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this