Do Service Providers in Tanzania Unnecessarily Restrict Clients' Access to Contraceptive Methods?

Ilene S. Speizer, David R. Hotchkiss, Robert J. Magnani, Brian Hubbard, Kristin N Mmari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context: Even where family planning services are physically accessible and economic barriers to access are few, medical barriers to contraceptive services - such as overspecialization, eligibility restrictions, process hurdles and provider bias - can limit women's use of services. Methods: Data from the 1996 Tanzania Service Availability Survey are used to analyze the prevalence of medical barriers by type of provider, by type of facility and by urban-rural location. Results: Relatively high proportions of providers restrict eligibility by age, particularly for oral contraceptives, the most widely used method among Tanzanian women. Between 79% and 81% of medical aides, trained midwives, maternal and child health aides and auxiliary staff (the most common types of family planning service providers in rural Tanzania) impose age restrictions for the pill. Among all providers, 10-13% report that there is at least one modem method they would never recommend, and 13% report having sent a client home until her next menses, an inappropriate process hurdle for the provision of most hormonal methods. In the aggregate, these restrictions severely limit access to contraceptives for certain groups of women. For example, young, unmarried women who are not menstruating at the time of their visit would encounter one or more barriers or process hurdles at more than 70% of urban facilities and at 80% of rural facilities. Conclusions: If preservice and in-service training and supervisory visits placed greater emphasis on compliance with the Tanzanian National Family Planning Program's service guidelines and standards, providers' unnecessary restrictions on contraceptive use might be reduced, and ultimately eliminated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)13-20
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Family Planning Perspectives
Volume26
Issue number4
StatePublished - Mar 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tanzania
Family Planning Services
Contraception
contraceptive
service provider
Contraceptive Agents
family planning
Modems
Menstruation
Midwifery
Oral Contraceptives
maternal health
midwife
Economics
contraceptive use
Guidelines
child health
services
method
compliance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Demography

Cite this

Do Service Providers in Tanzania Unnecessarily Restrict Clients' Access to Contraceptive Methods? / Speizer, Ilene S.; Hotchkiss, David R.; Magnani, Robert J.; Hubbard, Brian; Mmari, Kristin N.

In: International Family Planning Perspectives, Vol. 26, No. 4, 03.2000, p. 13-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Speizer, Ilene S. ; Hotchkiss, David R. ; Magnani, Robert J. ; Hubbard, Brian ; Mmari, Kristin N. / Do Service Providers in Tanzania Unnecessarily Restrict Clients' Access to Contraceptive Methods?. In: International Family Planning Perspectives. 2000 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 13-20.
@article{52450a1fd85e4ca2b805caf5cf531050,
title = "Do Service Providers in Tanzania Unnecessarily Restrict Clients' Access to Contraceptive Methods?",
abstract = "Context: Even where family planning services are physically accessible and economic barriers to access are few, medical barriers to contraceptive services - such as overspecialization, eligibility restrictions, process hurdles and provider bias - can limit women's use of services. Methods: Data from the 1996 Tanzania Service Availability Survey are used to analyze the prevalence of medical barriers by type of provider, by type of facility and by urban-rural location. Results: Relatively high proportions of providers restrict eligibility by age, particularly for oral contraceptives, the most widely used method among Tanzanian women. Between 79{\%} and 81{\%} of medical aides, trained midwives, maternal and child health aides and auxiliary staff (the most common types of family planning service providers in rural Tanzania) impose age restrictions for the pill. Among all providers, 10-13{\%} report that there is at least one modem method they would never recommend, and 13{\%} report having sent a client home until her next menses, an inappropriate process hurdle for the provision of most hormonal methods. In the aggregate, these restrictions severely limit access to contraceptives for certain groups of women. For example, young, unmarried women who are not menstruating at the time of their visit would encounter one or more barriers or process hurdles at more than 70{\%} of urban facilities and at 80{\%} of rural facilities. Conclusions: If preservice and in-service training and supervisory visits placed greater emphasis on compliance with the Tanzanian National Family Planning Program's service guidelines and standards, providers' unnecessary restrictions on contraceptive use might be reduced, and ultimately eliminated.",
author = "Speizer, {Ilene S.} and Hotchkiss, {David R.} and Magnani, {Robert J.} and Brian Hubbard and Mmari, {Kristin N}",
year = "2000",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "13--20",
journal = "International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health",
issn = "1944-0391",
publisher = "Alan Guttmacher Institute",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Service Providers in Tanzania Unnecessarily Restrict Clients' Access to Contraceptive Methods?

AU - Speizer, Ilene S.

AU - Hotchkiss, David R.

AU - Magnani, Robert J.

AU - Hubbard, Brian

AU - Mmari, Kristin N

PY - 2000/3

Y1 - 2000/3

N2 - Context: Even where family planning services are physically accessible and economic barriers to access are few, medical barriers to contraceptive services - such as overspecialization, eligibility restrictions, process hurdles and provider bias - can limit women's use of services. Methods: Data from the 1996 Tanzania Service Availability Survey are used to analyze the prevalence of medical barriers by type of provider, by type of facility and by urban-rural location. Results: Relatively high proportions of providers restrict eligibility by age, particularly for oral contraceptives, the most widely used method among Tanzanian women. Between 79% and 81% of medical aides, trained midwives, maternal and child health aides and auxiliary staff (the most common types of family planning service providers in rural Tanzania) impose age restrictions for the pill. Among all providers, 10-13% report that there is at least one modem method they would never recommend, and 13% report having sent a client home until her next menses, an inappropriate process hurdle for the provision of most hormonal methods. In the aggregate, these restrictions severely limit access to contraceptives for certain groups of women. For example, young, unmarried women who are not menstruating at the time of their visit would encounter one or more barriers or process hurdles at more than 70% of urban facilities and at 80% of rural facilities. Conclusions: If preservice and in-service training and supervisory visits placed greater emphasis on compliance with the Tanzanian National Family Planning Program's service guidelines and standards, providers' unnecessary restrictions on contraceptive use might be reduced, and ultimately eliminated.

AB - Context: Even where family planning services are physically accessible and economic barriers to access are few, medical barriers to contraceptive services - such as overspecialization, eligibility restrictions, process hurdles and provider bias - can limit women's use of services. Methods: Data from the 1996 Tanzania Service Availability Survey are used to analyze the prevalence of medical barriers by type of provider, by type of facility and by urban-rural location. Results: Relatively high proportions of providers restrict eligibility by age, particularly for oral contraceptives, the most widely used method among Tanzanian women. Between 79% and 81% of medical aides, trained midwives, maternal and child health aides and auxiliary staff (the most common types of family planning service providers in rural Tanzania) impose age restrictions for the pill. Among all providers, 10-13% report that there is at least one modem method they would never recommend, and 13% report having sent a client home until her next menses, an inappropriate process hurdle for the provision of most hormonal methods. In the aggregate, these restrictions severely limit access to contraceptives for certain groups of women. For example, young, unmarried women who are not menstruating at the time of their visit would encounter one or more barriers or process hurdles at more than 70% of urban facilities and at 80% of rural facilities. Conclusions: If preservice and in-service training and supervisory visits placed greater emphasis on compliance with the Tanzanian National Family Planning Program's service guidelines and standards, providers' unnecessary restrictions on contraceptive use might be reduced, and ultimately eliminated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007822408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007822408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0007822408

VL - 26

SP - 13

EP - 20

JO - International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

JF - International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

SN - 1944-0391

IS - 4

ER -