Do Profiles of Adolescent Temperament Differ on Family Processes and Adult Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms?

Jill Rabinowitz, Deborah A.G. Drabick, Jessica Packard, Maureen D. Reynolds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the present study, we examined whether profiles of temperamental features in adolescence (a) predict internalizing and externalizing symptoms in early adulthood, and (b) differ in family processes (i.e., cohesion, conflict) during early adolescence. Participants were 662 youth (72% male; 76% White). Mothers reported on family cohesion and conflict during participants’ early adolescence (ages 12–14, Time 1). Youth completed measures of temperament in middle adolescence (ages 16, Time 2), and of their symptoms in middle adolescence (Time 2), late adolescence (age 19, Time 3), and early adulthood (age 22, Time 4). Latent profile analysis identified three temperamental profiles: low positive mood, low rhythmicity, and well-regulated. Individuals in the low rhythmicity profile reported higher levels of externalizing symptoms compared to the well-regulated profile. No between-profile differences were found for internalizing symptoms. Mothers of youth in the low positive mood and low rhythmicity profiles reported higher levels of family conflict than the well-regulated profile. In addition, mothers of youth in the low positive mood profile reported lower levels of family cohesion than the well-regulated profile. Research implications of the study findings are presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)457-467
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Child and Family Studies
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2019

Fingerprint

Temperament
adolescence
adolescent
group cohesion
mood
Periodicity
adulthood
Family Conflict
Mothers
time

Keywords

  • Early adulthood
  • Externalizing symptoms
  • Family processes
  • Internalizing symptoms
  • Latent profiles
  • Temperament

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Do Profiles of Adolescent Temperament Differ on Family Processes and Adult Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms? / Rabinowitz, Jill; Drabick, Deborah A.G.; Packard, Jessica; Reynolds, Maureen D.

In: Journal of Child and Family Studies, Vol. 28, No. 2, 15.02.2019, p. 457-467.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rabinowitz, Jill ; Drabick, Deborah A.G. ; Packard, Jessica ; Reynolds, Maureen D. / Do Profiles of Adolescent Temperament Differ on Family Processes and Adult Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms?. In: Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2019 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 457-467.
@article{12c853c1113841688119008b0ca5019e,
title = "Do Profiles of Adolescent Temperament Differ on Family Processes and Adult Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms?",
abstract = "In the present study, we examined whether profiles of temperamental features in adolescence (a) predict internalizing and externalizing symptoms in early adulthood, and (b) differ in family processes (i.e., cohesion, conflict) during early adolescence. Participants were 662 youth (72{\%} male; 76{\%} White). Mothers reported on family cohesion and conflict during participants’ early adolescence (ages 12–14, Time 1). Youth completed measures of temperament in middle adolescence (ages 16, Time 2), and of their symptoms in middle adolescence (Time 2), late adolescence (age 19, Time 3), and early adulthood (age 22, Time 4). Latent profile analysis identified three temperamental profiles: low positive mood, low rhythmicity, and well-regulated. Individuals in the low rhythmicity profile reported higher levels of externalizing symptoms compared to the well-regulated profile. No between-profile differences were found for internalizing symptoms. Mothers of youth in the low positive mood and low rhythmicity profiles reported higher levels of family conflict than the well-regulated profile. In addition, mothers of youth in the low positive mood profile reported lower levels of family cohesion than the well-regulated profile. Research implications of the study findings are presented.",
keywords = "Early adulthood, Externalizing symptoms, Family processes, Internalizing symptoms, Latent profiles, Temperament",
author = "Jill Rabinowitz and Drabick, {Deborah A.G.} and Jessica Packard and Reynolds, {Maureen D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s10826-018-1276-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "457--467",
journal = "Journal of Child and Family Studies",
issn = "1062-1024",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Profiles of Adolescent Temperament Differ on Family Processes and Adult Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms?

AU - Rabinowitz, Jill

AU - Drabick, Deborah A.G.

AU - Packard, Jessica

AU - Reynolds, Maureen D.

PY - 2019/2/15

Y1 - 2019/2/15

N2 - In the present study, we examined whether profiles of temperamental features in adolescence (a) predict internalizing and externalizing symptoms in early adulthood, and (b) differ in family processes (i.e., cohesion, conflict) during early adolescence. Participants were 662 youth (72% male; 76% White). Mothers reported on family cohesion and conflict during participants’ early adolescence (ages 12–14, Time 1). Youth completed measures of temperament in middle adolescence (ages 16, Time 2), and of their symptoms in middle adolescence (Time 2), late adolescence (age 19, Time 3), and early adulthood (age 22, Time 4). Latent profile analysis identified three temperamental profiles: low positive mood, low rhythmicity, and well-regulated. Individuals in the low rhythmicity profile reported higher levels of externalizing symptoms compared to the well-regulated profile. No between-profile differences were found for internalizing symptoms. Mothers of youth in the low positive mood and low rhythmicity profiles reported higher levels of family conflict than the well-regulated profile. In addition, mothers of youth in the low positive mood profile reported lower levels of family cohesion than the well-regulated profile. Research implications of the study findings are presented.

AB - In the present study, we examined whether profiles of temperamental features in adolescence (a) predict internalizing and externalizing symptoms in early adulthood, and (b) differ in family processes (i.e., cohesion, conflict) during early adolescence. Participants were 662 youth (72% male; 76% White). Mothers reported on family cohesion and conflict during participants’ early adolescence (ages 12–14, Time 1). Youth completed measures of temperament in middle adolescence (ages 16, Time 2), and of their symptoms in middle adolescence (Time 2), late adolescence (age 19, Time 3), and early adulthood (age 22, Time 4). Latent profile analysis identified three temperamental profiles: low positive mood, low rhythmicity, and well-regulated. Individuals in the low rhythmicity profile reported higher levels of externalizing symptoms compared to the well-regulated profile. No between-profile differences were found for internalizing symptoms. Mothers of youth in the low positive mood and low rhythmicity profiles reported higher levels of family conflict than the well-regulated profile. In addition, mothers of youth in the low positive mood profile reported lower levels of family cohesion than the well-regulated profile. Research implications of the study findings are presented.

KW - Early adulthood

KW - Externalizing symptoms

KW - Family processes

KW - Internalizing symptoms

KW - Latent profiles

KW - Temperament

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055982461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055982461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10826-018-1276-0

DO - 10.1007/s10826-018-1276-0

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 457

EP - 467

JO - Journal of Child and Family Studies

JF - Journal of Child and Family Studies

SN - 1062-1024

IS - 2

ER -