Do intensivists in ICU improve outcome?

Ralph J. Fuchs, Sean Berenholtz, Todd Dorman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite considerable investment of resources, there remains wide variation in organization of Intensive Care Units (ICUs). One key domain is the physician staffing. In particular, does staffing with physicians trained in critical care (intensivists) improve clinical outcomes? The rationale for improved outcome with intensivist staffing is that physicians who have the skills to treat critically ill patients, and who are immediately available to detect and treat problems, may prevent or attenuate morbidity and mortality. Intensivist staffing may also yield benefits through a leadership role at the intensive care unit organizational level. The improved sense of continuity and close attendance to patients may also bolster improved patient and family satisfaction. Intensivist-led or intensivist-staffed ICUs may also realize decreased resource use because these physicians may be better at reducing inappropriate admissions, preventing complications that prolong length of stay, and recognizing opportunities for prompt discharge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-135
Number of pages11
JournalBest Practice and Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005

Fingerprint

Intensive Care Units
Physicians
Critical Care
Patient Satisfaction
Critical Illness
Length of Stay
Organizations
Morbidity
Mortality

Keywords

  • Intensive care units
  • Length of stay
  • Literature review
  • Morbidity
  • Mortality
  • Outcome assessment
  • Telemedicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Do intensivists in ICU improve outcome? / Fuchs, Ralph J.; Berenholtz, Sean; Dorman, Todd.

In: Best Practice and Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology, Vol. 19, No. 1, 03.2005, p. 125-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{93ac837216984cf5a541606cc20b5266,
title = "Do intensivists in ICU improve outcome?",
abstract = "Despite considerable investment of resources, there remains wide variation in organization of Intensive Care Units (ICUs). One key domain is the physician staffing. In particular, does staffing with physicians trained in critical care (intensivists) improve clinical outcomes? The rationale for improved outcome with intensivist staffing is that physicians who have the skills to treat critically ill patients, and who are immediately available to detect and treat problems, may prevent or attenuate morbidity and mortality. Intensivist staffing may also yield benefits through a leadership role at the intensive care unit organizational level. The improved sense of continuity and close attendance to patients may also bolster improved patient and family satisfaction. Intensivist-led or intensivist-staffed ICUs may also realize decreased resource use because these physicians may be better at reducing inappropriate admissions, preventing complications that prolong length of stay, and recognizing opportunities for prompt discharge.",
keywords = "Intensive care units, Length of stay, Literature review, Morbidity, Mortality, Outcome assessment, Telemedicine",
author = "Fuchs, {Ralph J.} and Sean Berenholtz and Todd Dorman",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.bpa.2004.07.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "125--135",
journal = "Bailliere's Best Practice and Research in Clinical Anaesthesiology",
issn = "1521-6896",
publisher = "Bailliere Tindall Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do intensivists in ICU improve outcome?

AU - Fuchs, Ralph J.

AU - Berenholtz, Sean

AU - Dorman, Todd

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - Despite considerable investment of resources, there remains wide variation in organization of Intensive Care Units (ICUs). One key domain is the physician staffing. In particular, does staffing with physicians trained in critical care (intensivists) improve clinical outcomes? The rationale for improved outcome with intensivist staffing is that physicians who have the skills to treat critically ill patients, and who are immediately available to detect and treat problems, may prevent or attenuate morbidity and mortality. Intensivist staffing may also yield benefits through a leadership role at the intensive care unit organizational level. The improved sense of continuity and close attendance to patients may also bolster improved patient and family satisfaction. Intensivist-led or intensivist-staffed ICUs may also realize decreased resource use because these physicians may be better at reducing inappropriate admissions, preventing complications that prolong length of stay, and recognizing opportunities for prompt discharge.

AB - Despite considerable investment of resources, there remains wide variation in organization of Intensive Care Units (ICUs). One key domain is the physician staffing. In particular, does staffing with physicians trained in critical care (intensivists) improve clinical outcomes? The rationale for improved outcome with intensivist staffing is that physicians who have the skills to treat critically ill patients, and who are immediately available to detect and treat problems, may prevent or attenuate morbidity and mortality. Intensivist staffing may also yield benefits through a leadership role at the intensive care unit organizational level. The improved sense of continuity and close attendance to patients may also bolster improved patient and family satisfaction. Intensivist-led or intensivist-staffed ICUs may also realize decreased resource use because these physicians may be better at reducing inappropriate admissions, preventing complications that prolong length of stay, and recognizing opportunities for prompt discharge.

KW - Intensive care units

KW - Length of stay

KW - Literature review

KW - Morbidity

KW - Mortality

KW - Outcome assessment

KW - Telemedicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10644233037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10644233037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bpa.2004.07.003

DO - 10.1016/j.bpa.2004.07.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 15679063

AN - SCOPUS:10644233037

VL - 19

SP - 125

EP - 135

JO - Bailliere's Best Practice and Research in Clinical Anaesthesiology

JF - Bailliere's Best Practice and Research in Clinical Anaesthesiology

SN - 1521-6896

IS - 1

ER -