Do consumers respond to publicly reported quality information? Evidence from nursing homes

Rachel M. Werner, Edward C. Norton, R. Tamara Konetzka, Daniel E. Polsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Public reporting of quality information is designed to address information asymmetry in health care markets. Without public reporting, consumers may have little information to help them differentiate quality among providers, giving providers little incentive to compete on quality. Public reporting enables consumers to choose highly ranked providers. Using a four-year (2000-2003) panel dataset, we examine the relationship between report card scores and patient choice of nursing home after the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services began publicly reporting nursing home quality information on post-acute care in 2002. We find that the relationship between reported quality and nursing home choice is positive and statistically significant suggesting that patients were more likely to choose facilities with higher reported post-acute care quality after public reporting was initiated. However, the magnitude of the effect was small. We conclude that there has been minimal consumer response to information in the post-acute care market.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)50-61
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of health economics
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Subacute Care
Nursing Homes
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Health Care Sector
Motivation

Keywords

  • Nursing home care
  • Nursing home demand
  • Quality information
  • Report cards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Do consumers respond to publicly reported quality information? Evidence from nursing homes. / Werner, Rachel M.; Norton, Edward C.; Konetzka, R. Tamara; Polsky, Daniel E.

In: Journal of health economics, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 50-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Werner, Rachel M. ; Norton, Edward C. ; Konetzka, R. Tamara ; Polsky, Daniel E. / Do consumers respond to publicly reported quality information? Evidence from nursing homes. In: Journal of health economics. 2012 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 50-61.
@article{c73e9a5cb62b445683dadbe9abfbb023,
title = "Do consumers respond to publicly reported quality information? Evidence from nursing homes",
abstract = "Public reporting of quality information is designed to address information asymmetry in health care markets. Without public reporting, consumers may have little information to help them differentiate quality among providers, giving providers little incentive to compete on quality. Public reporting enables consumers to choose highly ranked providers. Using a four-year (2000-2003) panel dataset, we examine the relationship between report card scores and patient choice of nursing home after the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services began publicly reporting nursing home quality information on post-acute care in 2002. We find that the relationship between reported quality and nursing home choice is positive and statistically significant suggesting that patients were more likely to choose facilities with higher reported post-acute care quality after public reporting was initiated. However, the magnitude of the effect was small. We conclude that there has been minimal consumer response to information in the post-acute care market.",
keywords = "Nursing home care, Nursing home demand, Quality information, Report cards",
author = "Werner, {Rachel M.} and Norton, {Edward C.} and Konetzka, {R. Tamara} and Polsky, {Daniel E.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.01.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "50--61",
journal = "Journal of Health Economics",
issn = "0167-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do consumers respond to publicly reported quality information? Evidence from nursing homes

AU - Werner, Rachel M.

AU - Norton, Edward C.

AU - Konetzka, R. Tamara

AU - Polsky, Daniel E.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Public reporting of quality information is designed to address information asymmetry in health care markets. Without public reporting, consumers may have little information to help them differentiate quality among providers, giving providers little incentive to compete on quality. Public reporting enables consumers to choose highly ranked providers. Using a four-year (2000-2003) panel dataset, we examine the relationship between report card scores and patient choice of nursing home after the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services began publicly reporting nursing home quality information on post-acute care in 2002. We find that the relationship between reported quality and nursing home choice is positive and statistically significant suggesting that patients were more likely to choose facilities with higher reported post-acute care quality after public reporting was initiated. However, the magnitude of the effect was small. We conclude that there has been minimal consumer response to information in the post-acute care market.

AB - Public reporting of quality information is designed to address information asymmetry in health care markets. Without public reporting, consumers may have little information to help them differentiate quality among providers, giving providers little incentive to compete on quality. Public reporting enables consumers to choose highly ranked providers. Using a four-year (2000-2003) panel dataset, we examine the relationship between report card scores and patient choice of nursing home after the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services began publicly reporting nursing home quality information on post-acute care in 2002. We find that the relationship between reported quality and nursing home choice is positive and statistically significant suggesting that patients were more likely to choose facilities with higher reported post-acute care quality after public reporting was initiated. However, the magnitude of the effect was small. We conclude that there has been minimal consumer response to information in the post-acute care market.

KW - Nursing home care

KW - Nursing home demand

KW - Quality information

KW - Report cards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856444205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856444205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.01.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.01.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 22307033

AN - SCOPUS:84856444205

VL - 31

SP - 50

EP - 61

JO - Journal of Health Economics

JF - Journal of Health Economics

SN - 0167-6296

IS - 1

ER -