Do Autism-Specific and General Developmental Screens Have Complementary Clinical Value?

Raymond Sturner, Paul Bergmann, Barbara Howard, Kerry Bet, Lydia Stewart-Artz, Shana Attar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Prior studies suggest autism-specific and general developmental screens are complementary for identifying both autism and developmental delay (DD). Parents completed autism and developmental screens before 18-month visits. Children with failed screens for autism (n = 167) and age, gender, and practice-matched children passing screens (n = 241) completed diagnostic evaluations for autism and developmental delay. When referral for autism and/or DD was considered, overall false positives from the autism screens were less frequent than for referral for autism alone. Presence of a failed communication subscale in the developmental screen was a red flag for autism and/or DD. An ordinally-scored autism screen had more favorable characteristics when considering autism and/or DD, yet none of the screens achieved recommended standards at 18 months, reinforcing the need for recurrent screening as autism emerges in early development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3065-3076
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Volume53
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ASQ-3
  • Autism screening
  • Developmental screening
  • M-CHAT-R
  • M-CHAT-R/F
  • Q-CHAT-10

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do Autism-Specific and General Developmental Screens Have Complementary Clinical Value?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this