Divining testimony? The impact of interviewing props on children's reports of touching

Debra Ann Poole, Maggie Bruck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is a long-held assumption that objects help bridge the gap between what children know and what they can (or are willing to) explain. In this review, we present research on the extent to which two types of objects used as props in investigative interviews of children, anatomical dolls and body (human figure) diagrams, actually help children report accurate information about autobiographical events. We explain why available research does not instill confidence that props are the best solution to interviewing challenges, and we consider practitioners' and policy-makers responses to this evidence. Finally, we discuss the types of developmental research that are necessary to advance the field of evidence-based interviewing of children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-180
Number of pages16
JournalDevelopmental Review
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

testimony
Research
Administrative Personnel
Human Body
evidence
confidence
Interviews
event
interview

Keywords

  • Forensic interviewing
  • Interviewing props
  • Sexual abuse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Education
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Divining testimony? The impact of interviewing props on children's reports of touching. / Poole, Debra Ann; Bruck, Maggie.

In: Developmental Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 165-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{50521885fcf94a7e94f42f759db03860,
title = "Divining testimony? The impact of interviewing props on children's reports of touching",
abstract = "There is a long-held assumption that objects help bridge the gap between what children know and what they can (or are willing to) explain. In this review, we present research on the extent to which two types of objects used as props in investigative interviews of children, anatomical dolls and body (human figure) diagrams, actually help children report accurate information about autobiographical events. We explain why available research does not instill confidence that props are the best solution to interviewing challenges, and we consider practitioners' and policy-makers responses to this evidence. Finally, we discuss the types of developmental research that are necessary to advance the field of evidence-based interviewing of children.",
keywords = "Forensic interviewing, Interviewing props, Sexual abuse",
author = "Poole, {Debra Ann} and Maggie Bruck",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.dr.2012.06.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "165--180",
journal = "Developmental Review",
issn = "0273-2297",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Divining testimony? The impact of interviewing props on children's reports of touching

AU - Poole, Debra Ann

AU - Bruck, Maggie

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - There is a long-held assumption that objects help bridge the gap between what children know and what they can (or are willing to) explain. In this review, we present research on the extent to which two types of objects used as props in investigative interviews of children, anatomical dolls and body (human figure) diagrams, actually help children report accurate information about autobiographical events. We explain why available research does not instill confidence that props are the best solution to interviewing challenges, and we consider practitioners' and policy-makers responses to this evidence. Finally, we discuss the types of developmental research that are necessary to advance the field of evidence-based interviewing of children.

AB - There is a long-held assumption that objects help bridge the gap between what children know and what they can (or are willing to) explain. In this review, we present research on the extent to which two types of objects used as props in investigative interviews of children, anatomical dolls and body (human figure) diagrams, actually help children report accurate information about autobiographical events. We explain why available research does not instill confidence that props are the best solution to interviewing challenges, and we consider practitioners' and policy-makers responses to this evidence. Finally, we discuss the types of developmental research that are necessary to advance the field of evidence-based interviewing of children.

KW - Forensic interviewing

KW - Interviewing props

KW - Sexual abuse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865999209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865999209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dr.2012.06.007

DO - 10.1016/j.dr.2012.06.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 23144526

AN - SCOPUS:84865999209

VL - 32

SP - 165

EP - 180

JO - Developmental Review

JF - Developmental Review

SN - 0273-2297

IS - 3

ER -