Distress screening: Evaluating a protocol for gynecologic cancer survivors

Cynae Johnson, Marshalee George, Amanda N. Fader

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


BACKGROUND: A gynecologic cancer diagnosis and subsequent treatment may cause significant morbidity, leading to increased distress levels and poorer quality of life (QOL) for survivors. Clinicians have explored opportunities to integrate comprehensive distress management protocols into clinical settings using existing supportive care resources. OBJECTIVES: The aims were to improve multidisciplinary management of distress using a clinical pathway for gynecologic cancer survivors and to improve patient satisfaction with distress management. METHODS: This study is phase II of a quality improvement initiative to assess distress using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer and Patient Related Outcome Measures Information Systems QOL tool and to evaluate the use of a clinical pathway to identify and link gynecologic cancer survivors to multidisciplinary supportive care resources. The data were compared to results from phase I of this study with data triangulation that included medical record audits. FINDINGS: Thirty-five percent of survivors reported distress scores of 5 or greater. The use of a clinical pathway model for universal distress screening increased referrals to multidisciplinary service teams from 19 to 34, with a 32% increase in social work referrals. Patients appreciated the comprehensive approach the healthcare team used to treat cancer and help improve QOL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)353-361
Number of pages9
JournalClinical journal of oncology nursing
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2017


  • Distress screening
  • Gynecologic cancer survivors
  • Supportive care services

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)


Dive into the research topics of 'Distress screening: Evaluating a protocol for gynecologic cancer survivors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this