TY - JOUR
T1 - Distress and burnout among genetic service providers
AU - Bernhardt, Barbara A.
AU - Rushton, Cynda H.
AU - Carrese, Joseph
AU - Pyeritz, Reed E.
AU - Kolodner, Ken
AU - Geller, Gail
PY - 2009/7
Y1 - 2009/7
N2 - PURPOSE:: To determine the nature, sources, prevalence, and consequences of distress and burnout among genetics professionals. METHODS:: Mailed survey of randomly selected clinical geneticists (MDs), genetic counselors, and genetic nurses. RESULTS:: Two hundred and fourteen providers completed the survey (55% response rate). Eight discrete sources of distress were identified forming a valid 28-item scale (α = 0.89). The greatest sources of distress were compassion stress, the burden of professional responsibility, negative patient regard, and concerns about informational bias. Genetic counselors were significantly more likely to experience personal values conflicts, burden of professional responsibility, and concerns about informational bias than MDs or nurses. Burnout scores were lower among those practicing more than 20 years and nurses. Distress scores were positively correlated with burnout and professional dissatisfaction (P < 0.0001). Eighteen percent of respondents think about leaving patient care, and burnout was the most significant predictor. Predictors of burnout included greater distress, fewer years in practice, working in university-based settings, being a genetic counselor or an MD, and deriving less meaning from patient care. CONCLUSIONS:: Genetic service providers experience various types of distress that may be risk factors for burnout and professional dissatisfaction. Interventions to reduce distress and burnout are needed for both trainees and practitioners.
AB - PURPOSE:: To determine the nature, sources, prevalence, and consequences of distress and burnout among genetics professionals. METHODS:: Mailed survey of randomly selected clinical geneticists (MDs), genetic counselors, and genetic nurses. RESULTS:: Two hundred and fourteen providers completed the survey (55% response rate). Eight discrete sources of distress were identified forming a valid 28-item scale (α = 0.89). The greatest sources of distress were compassion stress, the burden of professional responsibility, negative patient regard, and concerns about informational bias. Genetic counselors were significantly more likely to experience personal values conflicts, burden of professional responsibility, and concerns about informational bias than MDs or nurses. Burnout scores were lower among those practicing more than 20 years and nurses. Distress scores were positively correlated with burnout and professional dissatisfaction (P < 0.0001). Eighteen percent of respondents think about leaving patient care, and burnout was the most significant predictor. Predictors of burnout included greater distress, fewer years in practice, working in university-based settings, being a genetic counselor or an MD, and deriving less meaning from patient care. CONCLUSIONS:: Genetic service providers experience various types of distress that may be risk factors for burnout and professional dissatisfaction. Interventions to reduce distress and burnout are needed for both trainees and practitioners.
KW - Burnout
KW - Distress
KW - Genetic service providers
KW - Job satisfaction
KW - Manpower
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68749087405&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68749087405&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181a6a1c2
DO - 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181a6a1c2
M3 - Article
C2 - 19444128
AN - SCOPUS:68749087405
SN - 1098-3600
VL - 11
SP - 527
EP - 535
JO - Genetics in Medicine
JF - Genetics in Medicine
IS - 7
ER -