Distress and burnout among genetic service providers

Barbara A. Bernhardt, Cynthia H Rushton, Joseph Carrese, Reed E. Pyeritz, Ken Kolodner, Gail Geller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE:: To determine the nature, sources, prevalence, and consequences of distress and burnout among genetics professionals. METHODS:: Mailed survey of randomly selected clinical geneticists (MDs), genetic counselors, and genetic nurses. RESULTS:: Two hundred and fourteen providers completed the survey (55% response rate). Eight discrete sources of distress were identified forming a valid 28-item scale (α = 0.89). The greatest sources of distress were compassion stress, the burden of professional responsibility, negative patient regard, and concerns about informational bias. Genetic counselors were significantly more likely to experience personal values conflicts, burden of professional responsibility, and concerns about informational bias than MDs or nurses. Burnout scores were lower among those practicing more than 20 years and nurses. Distress scores were positively correlated with burnout and professional dissatisfaction (P <0.0001). Eighteen percent of respondents think about leaving patient care, and burnout was the most significant predictor. Predictors of burnout included greater distress, fewer years in practice, working in university-based settings, being a genetic counselor or an MD, and deriving less meaning from patient care. CONCLUSIONS:: Genetic service providers experience various types of distress that may be risk factors for burnout and professional dissatisfaction. Interventions to reduce distress and burnout are needed for both trainees and practitioners.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)527-535
Number of pages9
JournalGenetics in Medicine
Volume11
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009

Fingerprint

Genetic Services
Professional Burnout
Nurses
Patient Care
Counselors
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Burnout
  • Distress
  • Genetic service providers
  • Job satisfaction
  • Manpower

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Distress and burnout among genetic service providers. / Bernhardt, Barbara A.; Rushton, Cynthia H; Carrese, Joseph; Pyeritz, Reed E.; Kolodner, Ken; Geller, Gail.

In: Genetics in Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 7, 07.2009, p. 527-535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bernhardt, Barbara A. ; Rushton, Cynthia H ; Carrese, Joseph ; Pyeritz, Reed E. ; Kolodner, Ken ; Geller, Gail. / Distress and burnout among genetic service providers. In: Genetics in Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 11, No. 7. pp. 527-535.
@article{4f9c7d8a922641e6b9e182d93edaccf9,
title = "Distress and burnout among genetic service providers",
abstract = "PURPOSE:: To determine the nature, sources, prevalence, and consequences of distress and burnout among genetics professionals. METHODS:: Mailed survey of randomly selected clinical geneticists (MDs), genetic counselors, and genetic nurses. RESULTS:: Two hundred and fourteen providers completed the survey (55{\%} response rate). Eight discrete sources of distress were identified forming a valid 28-item scale (α = 0.89). The greatest sources of distress were compassion stress, the burden of professional responsibility, negative patient regard, and concerns about informational bias. Genetic counselors were significantly more likely to experience personal values conflicts, burden of professional responsibility, and concerns about informational bias than MDs or nurses. Burnout scores were lower among those practicing more than 20 years and nurses. Distress scores were positively correlated with burnout and professional dissatisfaction (P <0.0001). Eighteen percent of respondents think about leaving patient care, and burnout was the most significant predictor. Predictors of burnout included greater distress, fewer years in practice, working in university-based settings, being a genetic counselor or an MD, and deriving less meaning from patient care. CONCLUSIONS:: Genetic service providers experience various types of distress that may be risk factors for burnout and professional dissatisfaction. Interventions to reduce distress and burnout are needed for both trainees and practitioners.",
keywords = "Burnout, Distress, Genetic service providers, Job satisfaction, Manpower",
author = "Bernhardt, {Barbara A.} and Rushton, {Cynthia H} and Joseph Carrese and Pyeritz, {Reed E.} and Ken Kolodner and Gail Geller",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181a6a1c2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "527--535",
journal = "Genetics in Medicine",
issn = "1098-3600",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distress and burnout among genetic service providers

AU - Bernhardt, Barbara A.

AU - Rushton, Cynthia H

AU - Carrese, Joseph

AU - Pyeritz, Reed E.

AU - Kolodner, Ken

AU - Geller, Gail

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - PURPOSE:: To determine the nature, sources, prevalence, and consequences of distress and burnout among genetics professionals. METHODS:: Mailed survey of randomly selected clinical geneticists (MDs), genetic counselors, and genetic nurses. RESULTS:: Two hundred and fourteen providers completed the survey (55% response rate). Eight discrete sources of distress were identified forming a valid 28-item scale (α = 0.89). The greatest sources of distress were compassion stress, the burden of professional responsibility, negative patient regard, and concerns about informational bias. Genetic counselors were significantly more likely to experience personal values conflicts, burden of professional responsibility, and concerns about informational bias than MDs or nurses. Burnout scores were lower among those practicing more than 20 years and nurses. Distress scores were positively correlated with burnout and professional dissatisfaction (P <0.0001). Eighteen percent of respondents think about leaving patient care, and burnout was the most significant predictor. Predictors of burnout included greater distress, fewer years in practice, working in university-based settings, being a genetic counselor or an MD, and deriving less meaning from patient care. CONCLUSIONS:: Genetic service providers experience various types of distress that may be risk factors for burnout and professional dissatisfaction. Interventions to reduce distress and burnout are needed for both trainees and practitioners.

AB - PURPOSE:: To determine the nature, sources, prevalence, and consequences of distress and burnout among genetics professionals. METHODS:: Mailed survey of randomly selected clinical geneticists (MDs), genetic counselors, and genetic nurses. RESULTS:: Two hundred and fourteen providers completed the survey (55% response rate). Eight discrete sources of distress were identified forming a valid 28-item scale (α = 0.89). The greatest sources of distress were compassion stress, the burden of professional responsibility, negative patient regard, and concerns about informational bias. Genetic counselors were significantly more likely to experience personal values conflicts, burden of professional responsibility, and concerns about informational bias than MDs or nurses. Burnout scores were lower among those practicing more than 20 years and nurses. Distress scores were positively correlated with burnout and professional dissatisfaction (P <0.0001). Eighteen percent of respondents think about leaving patient care, and burnout was the most significant predictor. Predictors of burnout included greater distress, fewer years in practice, working in university-based settings, being a genetic counselor or an MD, and deriving less meaning from patient care. CONCLUSIONS:: Genetic service providers experience various types of distress that may be risk factors for burnout and professional dissatisfaction. Interventions to reduce distress and burnout are needed for both trainees and practitioners.

KW - Burnout

KW - Distress

KW - Genetic service providers

KW - Job satisfaction

KW - Manpower

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68749087405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68749087405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181a6a1c2

DO - 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181a6a1c2

M3 - Article

C2 - 19444128

AN - SCOPUS:68749087405

VL - 11

SP - 527

EP - 535

JO - Genetics in Medicine

JF - Genetics in Medicine

SN - 1098-3600

IS - 7

ER -