Disease progression following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason score 7 tumor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The long-term prognosis of men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate is uncertain. Materials and Methods: We studied 488 men whose radical prostatectomy specimen showed Gleason score 7 tumor without involvement of the seminal vesicles or lymph nodes. Of the 400 men without progression 318 had been followed for 2 years or more and 93 for 7 years or more. Results: Cases of organ confined disease and negative margins regardless of extent of extraprostatic extension had roughly similar and better prognoses than cases of focal and established extraprostatic extension with positive margins. The greater influence of margin status on progression (p <0.0001) compared to extent of extraprostatic extension (p = 0.023) was evidenced in the multivariate analysis. Of 30 men with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins 6 (20%) had progression to distant metastases, which was similar to 14 of 58 (24%) without established extraprostatic extension and positive margins. There was no difference in response to radiotherapy between men with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins compared to the other cases. Conclusions: Margins status greatly influences the risk of progression in men with Gleason score 7 tumors. Among men with Gleason score 7 tumors, except for those with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins, more than 50% appear to be cured at long-term followup. Because of the high risk of progression in patients with positive margins, clinical studies of adjuvant therapy in this population appear warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-101
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume160
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Neoplasm Grading
Prostatectomy
Disease Progression
Neoplasms
Seminal Vesicles
Prostate
Adenocarcinoma
Radiotherapy
Multivariate Analysis
Lymph Nodes
Neoplasm Metastasis
Population

Keywords

  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostatic neoplasms
  • Radiotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Disease progression following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason score 7 tumor. / Epstein, Jonathan Ira; Pound, C. R.; Partin, Alan Wayne; Walsh, Patrick; Blute, M. L.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 160, No. 1, 1998, p. 97-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{688fdecb9f3a4a72ba2fc2115cb8e18d,
title = "Disease progression following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason score 7 tumor",
abstract = "Purpose: The long-term prognosis of men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate is uncertain. Materials and Methods: We studied 488 men whose radical prostatectomy specimen showed Gleason score 7 tumor without involvement of the seminal vesicles or lymph nodes. Of the 400 men without progression 318 had been followed for 2 years or more and 93 for 7 years or more. Results: Cases of organ confined disease and negative margins regardless of extent of extraprostatic extension had roughly similar and better prognoses than cases of focal and established extraprostatic extension with positive margins. The greater influence of margin status on progression (p <0.0001) compared to extent of extraprostatic extension (p = 0.023) was evidenced in the multivariate analysis. Of 30 men with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins 6 (20{\%}) had progression to distant metastases, which was similar to 14 of 58 (24{\%}) without established extraprostatic extension and positive margins. There was no difference in response to radiotherapy between men with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins compared to the other cases. Conclusions: Margins status greatly influences the risk of progression in men with Gleason score 7 tumors. Among men with Gleason score 7 tumors, except for those with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins, more than 50{\%} appear to be cured at long-term followup. Because of the high risk of progression in patients with positive margins, clinical studies of adjuvant therapy in this population appear warranted.",
keywords = "Prostatectomy, Prostatic neoplasms, Radiotherapy",
author = "Epstein, {Jonathan Ira} and Pound, {C. R.} and Partin, {Alan Wayne} and Patrick Walsh and Blute, {M. L.}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63045-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "160",
pages = "97--101",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disease progression following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason score 7 tumor

AU - Epstein, Jonathan Ira

AU - Pound, C. R.

AU - Partin, Alan Wayne

AU - Walsh, Patrick

AU - Blute, M. L.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Purpose: The long-term prognosis of men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate is uncertain. Materials and Methods: We studied 488 men whose radical prostatectomy specimen showed Gleason score 7 tumor without involvement of the seminal vesicles or lymph nodes. Of the 400 men without progression 318 had been followed for 2 years or more and 93 for 7 years or more. Results: Cases of organ confined disease and negative margins regardless of extent of extraprostatic extension had roughly similar and better prognoses than cases of focal and established extraprostatic extension with positive margins. The greater influence of margin status on progression (p <0.0001) compared to extent of extraprostatic extension (p = 0.023) was evidenced in the multivariate analysis. Of 30 men with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins 6 (20%) had progression to distant metastases, which was similar to 14 of 58 (24%) without established extraprostatic extension and positive margins. There was no difference in response to radiotherapy between men with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins compared to the other cases. Conclusions: Margins status greatly influences the risk of progression in men with Gleason score 7 tumors. Among men with Gleason score 7 tumors, except for those with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins, more than 50% appear to be cured at long-term followup. Because of the high risk of progression in patients with positive margins, clinical studies of adjuvant therapy in this population appear warranted.

AB - Purpose: The long-term prognosis of men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate is uncertain. Materials and Methods: We studied 488 men whose radical prostatectomy specimen showed Gleason score 7 tumor without involvement of the seminal vesicles or lymph nodes. Of the 400 men without progression 318 had been followed for 2 years or more and 93 for 7 years or more. Results: Cases of organ confined disease and negative margins regardless of extent of extraprostatic extension had roughly similar and better prognoses than cases of focal and established extraprostatic extension with positive margins. The greater influence of margin status on progression (p <0.0001) compared to extent of extraprostatic extension (p = 0.023) was evidenced in the multivariate analysis. Of 30 men with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins 6 (20%) had progression to distant metastases, which was similar to 14 of 58 (24%) without established extraprostatic extension and positive margins. There was no difference in response to radiotherapy between men with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins compared to the other cases. Conclusions: Margins status greatly influences the risk of progression in men with Gleason score 7 tumors. Among men with Gleason score 7 tumors, except for those with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins, more than 50% appear to be cured at long-term followup. Because of the high risk of progression in patients with positive margins, clinical studies of adjuvant therapy in this population appear warranted.

KW - Prostatectomy

KW - Prostatic neoplasms

KW - Radiotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032323451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032323451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63045-3

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63045-3

M3 - Article

VL - 160

SP - 97

EP - 101

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 1

ER -