Different patterns of sensitization following renal allograft rejection in an inbred rat strain combination

Dannah W. Wray, William M. Baldwin, Fred Sanfilippo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Exposure to MHC antigens by kidney transplantation can result in long-term sensitization or tolerance. In order to characterize immune responses to an acutely rejected renal allograft, ACI (RT1a) kidneys were transplanted into untreated male PVG (RT1e) recipients and allowed to reject while one native kidney remained in situ for host survival. Two distinct patterns of recipient sensitization were found based on early IgM responses to RT1.Aa following rejection, with “weakly sensitized” and “strongly sensitized” groups comprising approximately 40% and 60%, respectively, of the recipients. Serum taken from strongly versus weakly sensitized animals at the time of peak IgM responses (7 days post-transplantation) showed greater ability to block binding of anti-RT1.Aa mAb (R2/15S, R2/10P, or YR1/100) to PVG.1A (RT1a class I and II on a PVG background) lymph node target cells. Sera obtained from strongly sensitized recipients during peak IgG responses (4 weeks after kidney transplantation) demonstrated significantly higher IgG2a and IgG2b alloantibody levels than weakly sensitized rats at all serum dilutions (1:4-1:1024). Allografts harvested 10 days after transplantation from strongly sensitized recipients (strong R2/10P-blocking serum, n=9) had a vascular pattern of rejection characterized primarily by extensive vascular endothelial damage, glomerular and cortical necrosis, and gross infarction of the graft. In contrast, grafts harvested from weakly sensitized recipients at 10 days, 21 days, or >6 months (n=6, 10, and 6, respectively) posttransplantation showed a significantly different pattern of rejection, with moderate interstitial lymphocytic infiltrates but substantial preservation of the general kidney architecture. When challenged 13 weeks posttransplantation, strongly sensitized animals rejected RT1.Aa class I-disparate PVG.R1 skin grafts in an accelerated fashion, whereas such grafts survived indefinitely on weakly sensitized recipients. These findings indicate that two patterns of renal allograft rejection can occur between a fixed strain disparity, one of which results in long-term sensitization and the other with partial tolerance to donor class IMHC antigens, as evidenced by (1) decreased production of IgM, IgG2a and IgG2b isotype alloantibody to donor class I MHC antigen epitopes after kidney rejection and (2) acceptance of donor class I-disparate skin grafts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1132-1138
Number of pages7
JournalTransplantation
Volume55
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Inbred Strains Rats
Allografts
Kidney
Transplants
Immunoglobulin M
Isoantibodies
Serum
Kidney Transplantation
Blood Vessels
Kidney Cortex Necrosis
Transplantation
Antigens
Skin
Histocompatibility Antigens Class I
Infarction
Epitopes
Immunoglobulin G
Lymph Nodes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation
  • Immunology

Cite this

Different patterns of sensitization following renal allograft rejection in an inbred rat strain combination. / Wray, Dannah W.; Baldwin, William M.; Sanfilippo, Fred.

In: Transplantation, Vol. 55, No. 5, 1993, p. 1132-1138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wray, Dannah W. ; Baldwin, William M. ; Sanfilippo, Fred. / Different patterns of sensitization following renal allograft rejection in an inbred rat strain combination. In: Transplantation. 1993 ; Vol. 55, No. 5. pp. 1132-1138.
@article{94e1edb664d44b168489123cbd053418,
title = "Different patterns of sensitization following renal allograft rejection in an inbred rat strain combination",
abstract = "Exposure to MHC antigens by kidney transplantation can result in long-term sensitization or tolerance. In order to characterize immune responses to an acutely rejected renal allograft, ACI (RT1a) kidneys were transplanted into untreated male PVG (RT1e) recipients and allowed to reject while one native kidney remained in situ for host survival. Two distinct patterns of recipient sensitization were found based on early IgM responses to RT1.Aa following rejection, with “weakly sensitized” and “strongly sensitized” groups comprising approximately 40{\%} and 60{\%}, respectively, of the recipients. Serum taken from strongly versus weakly sensitized animals at the time of peak IgM responses (7 days post-transplantation) showed greater ability to block binding of anti-RT1.Aa mAb (R2/15S, R2/10P, or YR1/100) to PVG.1A (RT1a class I and II on a PVG background) lymph node target cells. Sera obtained from strongly sensitized recipients during peak IgG responses (4 weeks after kidney transplantation) demonstrated significantly higher IgG2a and IgG2b alloantibody levels than weakly sensitized rats at all serum dilutions (1:4-1:1024). Allografts harvested 10 days after transplantation from strongly sensitized recipients (strong R2/10P-blocking serum, n=9) had a vascular pattern of rejection characterized primarily by extensive vascular endothelial damage, glomerular and cortical necrosis, and gross infarction of the graft. In contrast, grafts harvested from weakly sensitized recipients at 10 days, 21 days, or >6 months (n=6, 10, and 6, respectively) posttransplantation showed a significantly different pattern of rejection, with moderate interstitial lymphocytic infiltrates but substantial preservation of the general kidney architecture. When challenged 13 weeks posttransplantation, strongly sensitized animals rejected RT1.Aa class I-disparate PVG.R1 skin grafts in an accelerated fashion, whereas such grafts survived indefinitely on weakly sensitized recipients. These findings indicate that two patterns of renal allograft rejection can occur between a fixed strain disparity, one of which results in long-term sensitization and the other with partial tolerance to donor class IMHC antigens, as evidenced by (1) decreased production of IgM, IgG2a and IgG2b isotype alloantibody to donor class I MHC antigen epitopes after kidney rejection and (2) acceptance of donor class I-disparate skin grafts.",
author = "Wray, {Dannah W.} and Baldwin, {William M.} and Fred Sanfilippo",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "1132--1138",
journal = "Transplantation",
issn = "0041-1337",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different patterns of sensitization following renal allograft rejection in an inbred rat strain combination

AU - Wray, Dannah W.

AU - Baldwin, William M.

AU - Sanfilippo, Fred

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Exposure to MHC antigens by kidney transplantation can result in long-term sensitization or tolerance. In order to characterize immune responses to an acutely rejected renal allograft, ACI (RT1a) kidneys were transplanted into untreated male PVG (RT1e) recipients and allowed to reject while one native kidney remained in situ for host survival. Two distinct patterns of recipient sensitization were found based on early IgM responses to RT1.Aa following rejection, with “weakly sensitized” and “strongly sensitized” groups comprising approximately 40% and 60%, respectively, of the recipients. Serum taken from strongly versus weakly sensitized animals at the time of peak IgM responses (7 days post-transplantation) showed greater ability to block binding of anti-RT1.Aa mAb (R2/15S, R2/10P, or YR1/100) to PVG.1A (RT1a class I and II on a PVG background) lymph node target cells. Sera obtained from strongly sensitized recipients during peak IgG responses (4 weeks after kidney transplantation) demonstrated significantly higher IgG2a and IgG2b alloantibody levels than weakly sensitized rats at all serum dilutions (1:4-1:1024). Allografts harvested 10 days after transplantation from strongly sensitized recipients (strong R2/10P-blocking serum, n=9) had a vascular pattern of rejection characterized primarily by extensive vascular endothelial damage, glomerular and cortical necrosis, and gross infarction of the graft. In contrast, grafts harvested from weakly sensitized recipients at 10 days, 21 days, or >6 months (n=6, 10, and 6, respectively) posttransplantation showed a significantly different pattern of rejection, with moderate interstitial lymphocytic infiltrates but substantial preservation of the general kidney architecture. When challenged 13 weeks posttransplantation, strongly sensitized animals rejected RT1.Aa class I-disparate PVG.R1 skin grafts in an accelerated fashion, whereas such grafts survived indefinitely on weakly sensitized recipients. These findings indicate that two patterns of renal allograft rejection can occur between a fixed strain disparity, one of which results in long-term sensitization and the other with partial tolerance to donor class IMHC antigens, as evidenced by (1) decreased production of IgM, IgG2a and IgG2b isotype alloantibody to donor class I MHC antigen epitopes after kidney rejection and (2) acceptance of donor class I-disparate skin grafts.

AB - Exposure to MHC antigens by kidney transplantation can result in long-term sensitization or tolerance. In order to characterize immune responses to an acutely rejected renal allograft, ACI (RT1a) kidneys were transplanted into untreated male PVG (RT1e) recipients and allowed to reject while one native kidney remained in situ for host survival. Two distinct patterns of recipient sensitization were found based on early IgM responses to RT1.Aa following rejection, with “weakly sensitized” and “strongly sensitized” groups comprising approximately 40% and 60%, respectively, of the recipients. Serum taken from strongly versus weakly sensitized animals at the time of peak IgM responses (7 days post-transplantation) showed greater ability to block binding of anti-RT1.Aa mAb (R2/15S, R2/10P, or YR1/100) to PVG.1A (RT1a class I and II on a PVG background) lymph node target cells. Sera obtained from strongly sensitized recipients during peak IgG responses (4 weeks after kidney transplantation) demonstrated significantly higher IgG2a and IgG2b alloantibody levels than weakly sensitized rats at all serum dilutions (1:4-1:1024). Allografts harvested 10 days after transplantation from strongly sensitized recipients (strong R2/10P-blocking serum, n=9) had a vascular pattern of rejection characterized primarily by extensive vascular endothelial damage, glomerular and cortical necrosis, and gross infarction of the graft. In contrast, grafts harvested from weakly sensitized recipients at 10 days, 21 days, or >6 months (n=6, 10, and 6, respectively) posttransplantation showed a significantly different pattern of rejection, with moderate interstitial lymphocytic infiltrates but substantial preservation of the general kidney architecture. When challenged 13 weeks posttransplantation, strongly sensitized animals rejected RT1.Aa class I-disparate PVG.R1 skin grafts in an accelerated fashion, whereas such grafts survived indefinitely on weakly sensitized recipients. These findings indicate that two patterns of renal allograft rejection can occur between a fixed strain disparity, one of which results in long-term sensitization and the other with partial tolerance to donor class IMHC antigens, as evidenced by (1) decreased production of IgM, IgG2a and IgG2b isotype alloantibody to donor class I MHC antigen epitopes after kidney rejection and (2) acceptance of donor class I-disparate skin grafts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027195944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027195944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8497894

AN - SCOPUS:0027195944

VL - 55

SP - 1132

EP - 1138

JO - Transplantation

JF - Transplantation

SN - 0041-1337

IS - 5

ER -