Different paths to justice: The ADA, employment, and administrative enforcement by the EEOC and FEPAs

Kathryn Moss, Michael Ullman, Matthew C. Johnsen, Barbara E. Starrett, Scott Burris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Under Title I of the ADA, individuals who believe they have been subjected to disability-based employment discrimination may file an administrative charge. This article looks at who files charges, over what issues, and with what outcomes in both Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) field offices, and state and local fair employment practice agencies (FEPAs). The data for the article are computerized records of all ADA charges filed through March 31, 1998. The data indicate that individuals who rely on a FEPA to investigate their charge have a greater likelihood of obtaining a beneficial outcome than individuals who rely on the EEOC, but proportionately more individuals receiving a beneficial outcome are likely to receive monetary benefits from the EEOC than from a FEPA. Further, those who receive beneficial outcomes will probably receive greater monetary benefits from charges investigated by the EEOC than from those investigated by a FEPA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-46
Number of pages18
JournalBehavioral Sciences and the Law
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Different paths to justice: The ADA, employment, and administrative enforcement by the EEOC and FEPAs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this