Differences in the social networks of African American men who have sex with men only and those who have sex with men and women

Carl A Latkin, Cui Yang, Karin E Tobin, Typhanye Penniman, Jocelyn Patterson, Pilgrim Spikes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives. We compared social network characteristics of African American men who have sex with men only (MSMO) with social network characteristics of African American men who have sex with men and women (MSMW). Methods. Study participants were 234 African American men who have sex with men who completed a baseline social network assessment for a pilot behavioral HIV prevention intervention in Baltimore, Maryland, from 2006 through 2009. We surveyed the men to elicit the characteristics of their social networks, and we used logistic regression models to assess differences in network characteristics. Results. MSMO were significantly more likely than were MSMW to be HIV positive (52% vs 31%). We found no differences between MSMO and MSMW in the size of kin networks or emotional and material support networks. MSMW had denser sexual networks, reported more concurrent and exchange partners, used condoms with more sexual partners, and reported interaction with a larger number of sexual partners at least once a week. Conclusions. Although there were many similarities in the social and sexual network characteristics of MSMO and MSMW, differences did exist. HIV prevention interventions should address the unique needs of African American MSMW.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume101
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011

Fingerprint

Social Support
African Americans
Sexual Partners
HIV
Logistic Models
Baltimore
Condoms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Differences in the social networks of African American men who have sex with men only and those who have sex with men and women. / Latkin, Carl A; Yang, Cui; Tobin, Karin E; Penniman, Typhanye; Patterson, Jocelyn; Spikes, Pilgrim.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 101, No. 10, 01.10.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{026ede3205ed437f88058c6cfebc9c86,
title = "Differences in the social networks of African American men who have sex with men only and those who have sex with men and women",
abstract = "Objectives. We compared social network characteristics of African American men who have sex with men only (MSMO) with social network characteristics of African American men who have sex with men and women (MSMW). Methods. Study participants were 234 African American men who have sex with men who completed a baseline social network assessment for a pilot behavioral HIV prevention intervention in Baltimore, Maryland, from 2006 through 2009. We surveyed the men to elicit the characteristics of their social networks, and we used logistic regression models to assess differences in network characteristics. Results. MSMO were significantly more likely than were MSMW to be HIV positive (52{\%} vs 31{\%}). We found no differences between MSMO and MSMW in the size of kin networks or emotional and material support networks. MSMW had denser sexual networks, reported more concurrent and exchange partners, used condoms with more sexual partners, and reported interaction with a larger number of sexual partners at least once a week. Conclusions. Although there were many similarities in the social and sexual network characteristics of MSMO and MSMW, differences did exist. HIV prevention interventions should address the unique needs of African American MSMW.",
author = "Latkin, {Carl A} and Cui Yang and Tobin, {Karin E} and Typhanye Penniman and Jocelyn Patterson and Pilgrim Spikes",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2011.300281",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in the social networks of African American men who have sex with men only and those who have sex with men and women

AU - Latkin, Carl A

AU - Yang, Cui

AU - Tobin, Karin E

AU - Penniman, Typhanye

AU - Patterson, Jocelyn

AU - Spikes, Pilgrim

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - Objectives. We compared social network characteristics of African American men who have sex with men only (MSMO) with social network characteristics of African American men who have sex with men and women (MSMW). Methods. Study participants were 234 African American men who have sex with men who completed a baseline social network assessment for a pilot behavioral HIV prevention intervention in Baltimore, Maryland, from 2006 through 2009. We surveyed the men to elicit the characteristics of their social networks, and we used logistic regression models to assess differences in network characteristics. Results. MSMO were significantly more likely than were MSMW to be HIV positive (52% vs 31%). We found no differences between MSMO and MSMW in the size of kin networks or emotional and material support networks. MSMW had denser sexual networks, reported more concurrent and exchange partners, used condoms with more sexual partners, and reported interaction with a larger number of sexual partners at least once a week. Conclusions. Although there were many similarities in the social and sexual network characteristics of MSMO and MSMW, differences did exist. HIV prevention interventions should address the unique needs of African American MSMW.

AB - Objectives. We compared social network characteristics of African American men who have sex with men only (MSMO) with social network characteristics of African American men who have sex with men and women (MSMW). Methods. Study participants were 234 African American men who have sex with men who completed a baseline social network assessment for a pilot behavioral HIV prevention intervention in Baltimore, Maryland, from 2006 through 2009. We surveyed the men to elicit the characteristics of their social networks, and we used logistic regression models to assess differences in network characteristics. Results. MSMO were significantly more likely than were MSMW to be HIV positive (52% vs 31%). We found no differences between MSMO and MSMW in the size of kin networks or emotional and material support networks. MSMW had denser sexual networks, reported more concurrent and exchange partners, used condoms with more sexual partners, and reported interaction with a larger number of sexual partners at least once a week. Conclusions. Although there were many similarities in the social and sexual network characteristics of MSMO and MSMW, differences did exist. HIV prevention interventions should address the unique needs of African American MSMW.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053042274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053042274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300281

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300281

M3 - Article

C2 - 21852650

AN - SCOPUS:80053042274

VL - 101

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 10

ER -