Differences in neuroradiology training programs around the world

Tanja Schneider, T. A.G.M. Huisman, J. Fiehler, L. J. Savic, D. M. Yousem

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: No previous study compares neuroradiology training programs and teaching schedules across the globe, to our knowledge. This study was conducted to better understand international program requisites. MATERIALSANDMETHODS: Data from 43 countries were collected by an e-mail-based questionnaire (response rate, 84.0%). Radiologists across the world were surveyed regarding the neuroradiology training schemes in their institutions. Answers were verified by officers of the national neuroradiology societies. RESULTS: While many countries do not provide fellowship training in neuroradiology (n =16), others have formal postresidency curricula (n = 27). Many programs have few fellows and didactic sessions, but the 1- or 2-year duration of fellowship training is relatively consistent (n = 23/27, 85%). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variety of fellowship offerings, lessons provided, and ratios of teachers to learners in neuroradiology training programs globally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)440-444
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in neuroradiology training programs around the world'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this