Diagnostic efficiency of the CBCL thought problems and DSM-oriented psychotic symptoms scales for pediatric psychotic symptoms

Stephanie Salcedo, Sabeen H. Rizvi, Lindsey K. Freeman, Jennifer K. Youngstrom, Robert L Findling, Eric A. Youngstrom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We compared the diagnostic efficiency of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Thought Problems subscale and the rationally derived DSM-oriented psychotic symptoms scale (DOPSS) to identify clinically concerning psychosis in a multi-site sample of youths seeking outpatient mental health services (N = 694). We operationally defined clinically concerning psychosis as the presence of clinically significant hallucinations or delusions, assessed by the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia psychosis items. Both the Thought Problems and DOPSS scores showed significant areas under the curve (AUCs = 0.65 and 0.70, respectively), but the briefer DOPSS showed statistically significantly better diagnostic efficiency for any clinically concerning psychosis, but the difference was small enough that it would not be clinically meaningful. The optimal psychosis screening cut-off score (maximizing sensitivity and specificity) was 68.5+ [corresponding diagnostic likelihood ratio (DiLR) = 1.59] for the Thought Problems subscale and 1.67+ (DiLR = 1.97) for the DOPSS. Both the CBCL Thought Problems and DOPSS are clinically useful for identifying psychotic symptoms in children, and although the DOPSS showed statistically better discriminating power, the difference was small so we would not necessarily recommend the DOPSS over standard scoring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Mar 20 2018

Fingerprint

Child Behavior
Checklist
Psychotic Disorders
Pediatrics
Area Under Curve
Delusions
Hallucinations
Mental Health Services
Ambulatory Care
Mood Disorders
Schizophrenia
Appointments and Schedules
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • CBCL
  • Children
  • Evidence-based assessment
  • Psychotic symptoms
  • ROC
  • Thought Problems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Diagnostic efficiency of the CBCL thought problems and DSM-oriented psychotic symptoms scales for pediatric psychotic symptoms. / Salcedo, Stephanie; Rizvi, Sabeen H.; Freeman, Lindsey K.; Youngstrom, Jennifer K.; Findling, Robert L; Youngstrom, Eric A.

In: European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20.03.2018, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Salcedo, Stephanie ; Rizvi, Sabeen H. ; Freeman, Lindsey K. ; Youngstrom, Jennifer K. ; Findling, Robert L ; Youngstrom, Eric A. / Diagnostic efficiency of the CBCL thought problems and DSM-oriented psychotic symptoms scales for pediatric psychotic symptoms. In: European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2018 ; pp. 1-8.
@article{63da390c3e6445e190d9d4d720e75666,
title = "Diagnostic efficiency of the CBCL thought problems and DSM-oriented psychotic symptoms scales for pediatric psychotic symptoms",
abstract = "We compared the diagnostic efficiency of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Thought Problems subscale and the rationally derived DSM-oriented psychotic symptoms scale (DOPSS) to identify clinically concerning psychosis in a multi-site sample of youths seeking outpatient mental health services (N = 694). We operationally defined clinically concerning psychosis as the presence of clinically significant hallucinations or delusions, assessed by the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia psychosis items. Both the Thought Problems and DOPSS scores showed significant areas under the curve (AUCs = 0.65 and 0.70, respectively), but the briefer DOPSS showed statistically significantly better diagnostic efficiency for any clinically concerning psychosis, but the difference was small enough that it would not be clinically meaningful. The optimal psychosis screening cut-off score (maximizing sensitivity and specificity) was 68.5+ [corresponding diagnostic likelihood ratio (DiLR) = 1.59] for the Thought Problems subscale and 1.67+ (DiLR = 1.97) for the DOPSS. Both the CBCL Thought Problems and DOPSS are clinically useful for identifying psychotic symptoms in children, and although the DOPSS showed statistically better discriminating power, the difference was small so we would not necessarily recommend the DOPSS over standard scoring.",
keywords = "CBCL, Children, Evidence-based assessment, Psychotic symptoms, ROC, Thought Problems",
author = "Stephanie Salcedo and Rizvi, {Sabeen H.} and Freeman, {Lindsey K.} and Youngstrom, {Jennifer K.} and Findling, {Robert L} and Youngstrom, {Eric A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1007/s00787-018-1140-1",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry",
issn = "1018-8827",
publisher = "D. Steinkopff-Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic efficiency of the CBCL thought problems and DSM-oriented psychotic symptoms scales for pediatric psychotic symptoms

AU - Salcedo, Stephanie

AU - Rizvi, Sabeen H.

AU - Freeman, Lindsey K.

AU - Youngstrom, Jennifer K.

AU - Findling, Robert L

AU - Youngstrom, Eric A.

PY - 2018/3/20

Y1 - 2018/3/20

N2 - We compared the diagnostic efficiency of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Thought Problems subscale and the rationally derived DSM-oriented psychotic symptoms scale (DOPSS) to identify clinically concerning psychosis in a multi-site sample of youths seeking outpatient mental health services (N = 694). We operationally defined clinically concerning psychosis as the presence of clinically significant hallucinations or delusions, assessed by the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia psychosis items. Both the Thought Problems and DOPSS scores showed significant areas under the curve (AUCs = 0.65 and 0.70, respectively), but the briefer DOPSS showed statistically significantly better diagnostic efficiency for any clinically concerning psychosis, but the difference was small enough that it would not be clinically meaningful. The optimal psychosis screening cut-off score (maximizing sensitivity and specificity) was 68.5+ [corresponding diagnostic likelihood ratio (DiLR) = 1.59] for the Thought Problems subscale and 1.67+ (DiLR = 1.97) for the DOPSS. Both the CBCL Thought Problems and DOPSS are clinically useful for identifying psychotic symptoms in children, and although the DOPSS showed statistically better discriminating power, the difference was small so we would not necessarily recommend the DOPSS over standard scoring.

AB - We compared the diagnostic efficiency of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Thought Problems subscale and the rationally derived DSM-oriented psychotic symptoms scale (DOPSS) to identify clinically concerning psychosis in a multi-site sample of youths seeking outpatient mental health services (N = 694). We operationally defined clinically concerning psychosis as the presence of clinically significant hallucinations or delusions, assessed by the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia psychosis items. Both the Thought Problems and DOPSS scores showed significant areas under the curve (AUCs = 0.65 and 0.70, respectively), but the briefer DOPSS showed statistically significantly better diagnostic efficiency for any clinically concerning psychosis, but the difference was small enough that it would not be clinically meaningful. The optimal psychosis screening cut-off score (maximizing sensitivity and specificity) was 68.5+ [corresponding diagnostic likelihood ratio (DiLR) = 1.59] for the Thought Problems subscale and 1.67+ (DiLR = 1.97) for the DOPSS. Both the CBCL Thought Problems and DOPSS are clinically useful for identifying psychotic symptoms in children, and although the DOPSS showed statistically better discriminating power, the difference was small so we would not necessarily recommend the DOPSS over standard scoring.

KW - CBCL

KW - Children

KW - Evidence-based assessment

KW - Psychotic symptoms

KW - ROC

KW - Thought Problems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044231855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044231855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00787-018-1140-1

DO - 10.1007/s00787-018-1140-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 29556765

AN - SCOPUS:85044231855

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

JF - European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

SN - 1018-8827

ER -