Diagnostic and therapeutic values of intraoperative electrophysiological neuromonitoring during resection of intradural extramedullary spinal tumors: A single-center retrospective cohort and meta-analysis

Wataru Ishida, Joshua Casaos, Arun Chandra, Adam D’Sa, Seba Ramhmdani, Alexander Perdomo-Pantoja, Nicholas Theodore, George Jallo, Ziya L. Gokaslan, Jean Paul Wolinsky, Daniel Sciubba, Ali Bydon, Timothy F Witham, Sheng-fu Lo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE With the advent of intraoperative electrophysiological neuromonitoring (IONM), surgical outcomes of various neurosurgical pathologies, such as brain tumors and spinal deformities, have improved. However, its diagnostic and therapeutic value in resecting intradural extramedullary (ID-EM) spinal tumors has not been well documented in the literature. The objective of this study was to summarize the clinical results of IONM in patients with ID-EM spinal tumors. METHODS A retrospective patient database review identified 103 patients with ID-EM spinal tumors who underwent tumor resection with IONM (motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, and free-running electromyography) from January 2010 to December 2015. Patients were classified as those without any new neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up (group A; n = 86) and those with new deficits (group B; n = 17). Baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and IONM findings were collected and statistically analyzed. In addition, a meta-analysis in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines was performed to estimate the overall pooled diagnostic accuracy of IONM in ID-EM spinal tumor resection. RESULTS No intergroup differences were discovered between the groups regarding baseline characteristics and operative data. In multivariate analysis, significant IONM changes (p < 0.001) and tumor location (thoracic vs others, p = 0.018) were associated with new neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up. In predicting these changes, IONM yielded a sensitivity of 82.4% (14/17), specificity of 90.7% (78/86), positive predictive value (PPV) of 63.6% (14/22), negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.3% (78/81), and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893. The diagnostic value slightly decreased in patients with schwannomas (AUC = 0.875) and thoracic tumors (AUC = 0.842). Among 81 patients who did not demonstrate significant IONM changes at the end of surgery, 19 patients (23.5%) exhibited temporary intraoperative exacerbation of IONM signals, which were recovered by interruption of surgical maneuvers; none of these patients developed new neurological deficits postoperatively. Including the present study, 5 articles encompassing 323 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis, and the overall pooled diagnostic value of IONM was a sensitivity of 77.9%, a specificity of 91.1%, PPV of 56.7%, and NPV of 95.7%. CONCLUSIONS IONM for the resection of ID-EM spinal tumors is a reasonable modality to predict new postoperative neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up. Future prospective studies are warranted to further elucidate its diagnostic and therapeutic utility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)839-849
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume30
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Cohort Studies
Neoplasms
Area Under Curve
Therapeutics
Thorax
Motor Evoked Potentials
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Neurilemmoma
Electromyography
Brain Neoplasms
Multivariate Analysis
Databases
Prospective Studies
Guidelines
Pathology

Keywords

  • Diagnostic value
  • Intradural extramedullary spinal tumor
  • Intraoperative neuromonitoring
  • Motor evoked potentials
  • Oncology
  • Sensitivity
  • Somatosensory evoked potentials
  • Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Diagnostic and therapeutic values of intraoperative electrophysiological neuromonitoring during resection of intradural extramedullary spinal tumors : A single-center retrospective cohort and meta-analysis. / Ishida, Wataru; Casaos, Joshua; Chandra, Arun; D’Sa, Adam; Ramhmdani, Seba; Perdomo-Pantoja, Alexander; Theodore, Nicholas; Jallo, George; Gokaslan, Ziya L.; Wolinsky, Jean Paul; Sciubba, Daniel; Bydon, Ali; Witham, Timothy F; Lo, Sheng-fu.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Vol. 30, No. 6, 01.06.2019, p. 839-849.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ae05f362dd13485aa39796b9e1646a13,
title = "Diagnostic and therapeutic values of intraoperative electrophysiological neuromonitoring during resection of intradural extramedullary spinal tumors: A single-center retrospective cohort and meta-analysis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE With the advent of intraoperative electrophysiological neuromonitoring (IONM), surgical outcomes of various neurosurgical pathologies, such as brain tumors and spinal deformities, have improved. However, its diagnostic and therapeutic value in resecting intradural extramedullary (ID-EM) spinal tumors has not been well documented in the literature. The objective of this study was to summarize the clinical results of IONM in patients with ID-EM spinal tumors. METHODS A retrospective patient database review identified 103 patients with ID-EM spinal tumors who underwent tumor resection with IONM (motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, and free-running electromyography) from January 2010 to December 2015. Patients were classified as those without any new neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up (group A; n = 86) and those with new deficits (group B; n = 17). Baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and IONM findings were collected and statistically analyzed. In addition, a meta-analysis in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines was performed to estimate the overall pooled diagnostic accuracy of IONM in ID-EM spinal tumor resection. RESULTS No intergroup differences were discovered between the groups regarding baseline characteristics and operative data. In multivariate analysis, significant IONM changes (p < 0.001) and tumor location (thoracic vs others, p = 0.018) were associated with new neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up. In predicting these changes, IONM yielded a sensitivity of 82.4{\%} (14/17), specificity of 90.7{\%} (78/86), positive predictive value (PPV) of 63.6{\%} (14/22), negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.3{\%} (78/81), and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893. The diagnostic value slightly decreased in patients with schwannomas (AUC = 0.875) and thoracic tumors (AUC = 0.842). Among 81 patients who did not demonstrate significant IONM changes at the end of surgery, 19 patients (23.5{\%}) exhibited temporary intraoperative exacerbation of IONM signals, which were recovered by interruption of surgical maneuvers; none of these patients developed new neurological deficits postoperatively. Including the present study, 5 articles encompassing 323 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis, and the overall pooled diagnostic value of IONM was a sensitivity of 77.9{\%}, a specificity of 91.1{\%}, PPV of 56.7{\%}, and NPV of 95.7{\%}. CONCLUSIONS IONM for the resection of ID-EM spinal tumors is a reasonable modality to predict new postoperative neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up. Future prospective studies are warranted to further elucidate its diagnostic and therapeutic utility.",
keywords = "Diagnostic value, Intradural extramedullary spinal tumor, Intraoperative neuromonitoring, Motor evoked potentials, Oncology, Sensitivity, Somatosensory evoked potentials, Specificity",
author = "Wataru Ishida and Joshua Casaos and Arun Chandra and Adam D’Sa and Seba Ramhmdani and Alexander Perdomo-Pantoja and Nicholas Theodore and George Jallo and Gokaslan, {Ziya L.} and Wolinsky, {Jean Paul} and Daniel Sciubba and Ali Bydon and Witham, {Timothy F} and Sheng-fu Lo",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3171/2018.11.SPINE181095",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "839--849",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine",
issn = "1547-5654",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic and therapeutic values of intraoperative electrophysiological neuromonitoring during resection of intradural extramedullary spinal tumors

T2 - A single-center retrospective cohort and meta-analysis

AU - Ishida, Wataru

AU - Casaos, Joshua

AU - Chandra, Arun

AU - D’Sa, Adam

AU - Ramhmdani, Seba

AU - Perdomo-Pantoja, Alexander

AU - Theodore, Nicholas

AU - Jallo, George

AU - Gokaslan, Ziya L.

AU - Wolinsky, Jean Paul

AU - Sciubba, Daniel

AU - Bydon, Ali

AU - Witham, Timothy F

AU - Lo, Sheng-fu

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE With the advent of intraoperative electrophysiological neuromonitoring (IONM), surgical outcomes of various neurosurgical pathologies, such as brain tumors and spinal deformities, have improved. However, its diagnostic and therapeutic value in resecting intradural extramedullary (ID-EM) spinal tumors has not been well documented in the literature. The objective of this study was to summarize the clinical results of IONM in patients with ID-EM spinal tumors. METHODS A retrospective patient database review identified 103 patients with ID-EM spinal tumors who underwent tumor resection with IONM (motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, and free-running electromyography) from January 2010 to December 2015. Patients were classified as those without any new neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up (group A; n = 86) and those with new deficits (group B; n = 17). Baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and IONM findings were collected and statistically analyzed. In addition, a meta-analysis in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines was performed to estimate the overall pooled diagnostic accuracy of IONM in ID-EM spinal tumor resection. RESULTS No intergroup differences were discovered between the groups regarding baseline characteristics and operative data. In multivariate analysis, significant IONM changes (p < 0.001) and tumor location (thoracic vs others, p = 0.018) were associated with new neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up. In predicting these changes, IONM yielded a sensitivity of 82.4% (14/17), specificity of 90.7% (78/86), positive predictive value (PPV) of 63.6% (14/22), negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.3% (78/81), and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893. The diagnostic value slightly decreased in patients with schwannomas (AUC = 0.875) and thoracic tumors (AUC = 0.842). Among 81 patients who did not demonstrate significant IONM changes at the end of surgery, 19 patients (23.5%) exhibited temporary intraoperative exacerbation of IONM signals, which were recovered by interruption of surgical maneuvers; none of these patients developed new neurological deficits postoperatively. Including the present study, 5 articles encompassing 323 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis, and the overall pooled diagnostic value of IONM was a sensitivity of 77.9%, a specificity of 91.1%, PPV of 56.7%, and NPV of 95.7%. CONCLUSIONS IONM for the resection of ID-EM spinal tumors is a reasonable modality to predict new postoperative neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up. Future prospective studies are warranted to further elucidate its diagnostic and therapeutic utility.

AB - OBJECTIVE With the advent of intraoperative electrophysiological neuromonitoring (IONM), surgical outcomes of various neurosurgical pathologies, such as brain tumors and spinal deformities, have improved. However, its diagnostic and therapeutic value in resecting intradural extramedullary (ID-EM) spinal tumors has not been well documented in the literature. The objective of this study was to summarize the clinical results of IONM in patients with ID-EM spinal tumors. METHODS A retrospective patient database review identified 103 patients with ID-EM spinal tumors who underwent tumor resection with IONM (motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, and free-running electromyography) from January 2010 to December 2015. Patients were classified as those without any new neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up (group A; n = 86) and those with new deficits (group B; n = 17). Baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and IONM findings were collected and statistically analyzed. In addition, a meta-analysis in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines was performed to estimate the overall pooled diagnostic accuracy of IONM in ID-EM spinal tumor resection. RESULTS No intergroup differences were discovered between the groups regarding baseline characteristics and operative data. In multivariate analysis, significant IONM changes (p < 0.001) and tumor location (thoracic vs others, p = 0.018) were associated with new neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up. In predicting these changes, IONM yielded a sensitivity of 82.4% (14/17), specificity of 90.7% (78/86), positive predictive value (PPV) of 63.6% (14/22), negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.3% (78/81), and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893. The diagnostic value slightly decreased in patients with schwannomas (AUC = 0.875) and thoracic tumors (AUC = 0.842). Among 81 patients who did not demonstrate significant IONM changes at the end of surgery, 19 patients (23.5%) exhibited temporary intraoperative exacerbation of IONM signals, which were recovered by interruption of surgical maneuvers; none of these patients developed new neurological deficits postoperatively. Including the present study, 5 articles encompassing 323 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis, and the overall pooled diagnostic value of IONM was a sensitivity of 77.9%, a specificity of 91.1%, PPV of 56.7%, and NPV of 95.7%. CONCLUSIONS IONM for the resection of ID-EM spinal tumors is a reasonable modality to predict new postoperative neurological deficits at the 6-month follow-up. Future prospective studies are warranted to further elucidate its diagnostic and therapeutic utility.

KW - Diagnostic value

KW - Intradural extramedullary spinal tumor

KW - Intraoperative neuromonitoring

KW - Motor evoked potentials

KW - Oncology

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Somatosensory evoked potentials

KW - Specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066444913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066444913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2018.11.SPINE181095

DO - 10.3171/2018.11.SPINE181095

M3 - Article

C2 - 30835707

AN - SCOPUS:85066444913

VL - 30

SP - 839

EP - 849

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

SN - 1547-5654

IS - 6

ER -